Merits and Issues of Communicative Language Teaching in the Post-method Era

Authors

  • Hejin Yuan

Keywords:

Post-method Era; English Teaching; Communicative Language Teaching (CLT); Merits; Issue.

Abstract

Post-method theory is not a specific teaching method but an approach of foreign language teaching. The Post-method is beyond the level of specific methods and there is no fixed set of teaching methods. Communicative Language Teaching (CLT) plays an important role in cultivating students' communicative competence. With the advent of Post-method era, English teaching in China is gradually breaking the situation of single method and exploring English classroom teaching from multiple perspectives. This study explores the merits and issues of Communicative Language Teaching in China’s English teaching pedagogy from the perspective of Post-method era, and reflects on the application of Communicative Language Teaching from the perspective of Post-method era. So that Communicative Language Teaching can play a better role in English teaching pedagogy in China.

References

Al-Kadi, A. (2020). Reflections on Kumaravadivelu’s post-method pedagogy: Juxtaposing perceptions and practices. Mex TESOL, 44, 1–13.

B. Kumaravadivelu. (1994). The Postmethod Condition:( E) merging Strategies for Second/ Foreign Language Teaching.TESOL Quarterly, 28, 1.

Cook G. (2013). English Language Teacher Education: Notes on the Past and Future. De Gruyter, 2, 9-22.

Farrell, T.S., Guz, M. (2019). ‘If I wanted to survive I had to use it’: The power of teacher beliefs on classroom practices. TESL-EJ, 22, 1–17.

Halliday, M.A. K. (1970). Language Structure and Language Function, in J. Lyons (ed.) New Horizons in Linguistics, Harmondsworth: Penguin. 140-165.

Halliday A. (1994). Appropriate Methodology and Social Context. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Han Caiying. (1999). Analysis of the Applicability of Communicative Approach. A foreign language, 02, 8-10.

Howatt, A. P. R. (1984). A History of English Language Teaching. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Huang Q. (2017). A Study on the Roles of Teachers in CLT Classrooms by Metaphor Analysis. Canadian Social Science, 6, 62-71.

Jack, C., Richards, Theodore,S., Rodgers, Cairen ,& Wang.(2000). Approaches and methods in language teaching. Foreign language teaching research press.

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2001). Toward a Postmethod Pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 35, 537-560.

Kumaravadivelu, B. (2003). A Postmethod Perspective on English Language Teaching. World Englishes, 4.

Littlewood, W. (1981). Communicative Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. (2020). English Curriculum Standards for Senior High Schools: 2017 edition, 2020 revision. Beijing: People's Education Press.

Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China. (2022). English curriculum standards for compulsory education. Beijing: People's Education Press.

Richards,J. C.(1985). The secret life of methods. In Richards, The Context of Language Teaching, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Stephen Bax. (2003). The end of CLT: a context approach to Language teaching, Elt Journal, 57.

Wang Yingbin. (2002). What should Class size be? Foreign Primary and Secondary Education. 02,49.

Wesely PM, Vyn R, Neubauer D. (2021). Teacher beliefs about instructional approaches: Interrogating the notion of teaching methods. Language Teaching Research.

Wu Yanting. (2018). A Historical Analysis on Communicative Language Teaching in China. Overseas English, 21, 69-272.

Downloads

Published

2022-11-21

How to Cite

Yuan, H. (2022). Merits and Issues of Communicative Language Teaching in the Post-method Era. Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(11), 19–25. Retrieved from http://bcpublication.org/index.php/FHSS/article/view/2763

Issue

Section

Articles