Analysis on the Boundary Clarification and Construction Path of Civil Society
Keywords:Civil Society; The Governance of the State; Social Organization; Rights.
This paper takes civil society as the research object, and analyzes it in combination with China's national situation and specific practice. Through relevant research, this paper holds that the development of civil society can be judged by the development degree of social organizations, citizens' subjective consciousness and ideological deviation under the guidance of deconstruction. At the same time, this paper also tries to clarify the boundary of civil society: normative information is the perceptual boundary of citizens, orderly activities are the rational boundary of the media and the overall will is the unified boundary of the country. Finally, this paper thinks that we can build a civil society by tapping the power of the state, carrying forward the mainstream values and breaking the dualistic separation between the state and society.
Paul Gready,Simon Robins. Rethinking civil society and transitional justice: lessons from social movements and ‘new’ civil society[J]. The International Journal of Human Rights,2017,21(7).
Coxon K.Empathy, intersubjectivity, and virtue. Dissertation for Master of Arts. Department of Philosophy, Dalhousie University,2003.
Niels ten Oever. Productive Contestation, Civil Society, and Global Governance: Human Rights as a Boundary Object in ICANN[J]. Policy & Internet,2019,11(1).
Marek Hrubec,Zuzana Uhde. Global Conflicts and Local Interactions: Contradictions of Global Capitalism and Civil Society[J]. Critical Sociology,2019,45(6).
How to Cite
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.