Analysis of Corporate Governance and Technological Innovation based on a Certain Industry

Authors

  • Yukun Liu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v15i.288

Keywords:

Corporate Governance; Technological Innovation; Comparison by Industry.

Abstract

According to the importance degree of technological innovation in different industries, factors and intensity influencing innovation are different. Enterprises should have a matching corporate governance structure to carry out effective innovation activities. Using data of Chinese listed companies from 2015 to 2018, this paper analyzes and compares the impact of corporate governance on technological innovation in labor-intensive, capital-intensive and technology-intensive industries. Results show both similarities and differences exist in the relationship between corporate governance and technological innovation in the three industries. Previous literatures mainly focused on the relationship between corporate governance and innovation in a single industry, ignoring the comparison among different industries. By analyzing differences among industries, this paper proposes corporate governance should be matched with the characteristics of industries to better improve innovation, which is the application and expansion of the corporate governance theory in the field of innovation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baysinger BD, Kosnik RD& Turk TA.1991. Effects of board and ownership structure on corporate R&D strategy. Academy of Management Journal 34(1):205-214.

Feng GF& Wen J. 2008. An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship between Corporate Governance and Technological Innovation of Listed Companies in China. China Industrial Economy 7: 91-101.

Lu T & Dang Y. 2014. Corporate governance and technological innovation: a comparison by industry. Economic Studies 49(06):115-128.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-30

How to Cite

Liu, Y. (2021). Analysis of Corporate Governance and Technological Innovation based on a Certain Industry. BCP Business & Management, 15, 299-305. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v15i.288