Can Investment Liberalization Improve Enterprise Productivity: Evidence from the Negative List of Foreign Investment Access in China

Zhiyue Wang

doi:10.54691/65zx7w47

Authors

Zhiyue Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/65zx7w47

Keywords:

Investment Liberalization; Enterprise Productivity; Negative List for Foreign Investment Access.

Abstract

In the context of the new development pattern, a deep understanding of the factors affecting enterprise productivity and an accurate evaluation of the implementation effect of foreign access policies have important theoretical and practical significance for further promoting the improvement of enterprise quality and efficiency, and promoting the high-quality development of the Chinese economy. This article is based on the former research and uses the negative management list of foreign investment as the research basis to study the impact of investment liberalization on enterprise productivity and propose relevant policy recommendations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Arita, Levine R, Levkov A. Big bad banks? The winners and losers from bank deregulation in the United,2020 (10).

[2] Rizvi S Z A, Nishat M. The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Employment Opportunities: Panel Data Analysis: Empirical Evidence from Pakistan, India and China [J]. The Pakistan Development Review, 2009: 841-851.

[3] Wang and Wang Difference-in-differences with Variation in Treatment Timing [J]. Journal of Econometrics, 2021, 225 (2): 254-277.

[4] Guo Jiatang, Luo Pinliang. Does the Internet promote China's total factor productivity? [J]. Managing the World, 2016, (10): 34-49.

[5] Jiang Guanhong, Jiang Dianchun. Heterogeneity test of Chinese enterprises' outward direct investment: taking clothing, textile, and footwear enterprises as examples [J]. World Economic Research, 2013, (11): 61-65+79+89.

[6] Liu Jianjiang, Jiang Zhuqing The technology diffusion effect of foreign direct investment on China's productive service industry [J]. Journal of Social Sciences, Hunan Normal University, 2021, 50 (4): 78-88.

[7] Ma Yaming, Lu Jianming, Li Lei The Signal Effect of Negative List Mode International Investment Agreements and Their Impact on International Direct Investment [J]. Economic Research, 2021, 56 (11): 155-172.

[8] Mao Qilin, Fang Senhui. Does the liberalization of foreign investment affect the productivity of China's manufacturing industry? [J]. Social Science Digest, 2020, (04): 53-55.

[9] Mao Qilin, Sheng Bin. Trade liberalization, firm heterogeneity, and export dynamics: evidence from micro firm data in China [J]. Management World, 2013, (03): 48-65+68+66-67.

[10] Pei Changhong, Liu Hong feels guilty High quality development of China's foreign trade: reflections based on Xi Jinping's important statement on the centennial changes [J]. Economic Research, 2020, 55 (5): 4-20.

[11] Shao Haiyan. Research on the Impact of Investment Liberalization on the Scale of China's Outward Foreign Direct Investment [D]. University of International Business and Economics, 2016.

[12] Shao Min, Bao Qun. Does foreign investment exacerbate wage distortion in China: A case study of state-owned industrial enterprises? [J].World Economy, 2012, 35 (10): 3-24.

[13] Yuan Dongmei, Wang Yanhui, Li Henghui. Does the liberalization of foreign investment affect the employment skills structure of enterprises? Evidence from the negative list management mode of foreign investment access [J]. International Trade Issues, 2023, (12): 73-94.

[14] Zhu Shujin, Peng Sisi, Xie Rui. Dynamic General Equilibrium Analysis of Singapore's Investment in China under the Background of Investment Liberalization [J]. China Soft Science, 2011, (03): 46-55.