The Roles of Input and Output in How to Acquire L2 Vocabulary
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6918/IJOSSER.202411_7(11).0027Keywords:
Acquire L2 vocabulary; Input and output; Krashen; Swain.Abstract
This study examines the role of input and output in second language vocabulary acquisition. Through interviews and codes, this article analyzes the influence of different learning styles on vocabulary memory. Based on input and output theory, second language learning can be divided into three processes. A key aspect of learning a second language is understanding discourse and acquiring materials in the foreign language. A second aspect is that second language learners can absorb and internalize input language materials. Furthermore, second language learners can apply their internalized language knowledge and skills to produce products that are in line with English language culture and rules. All three processes are based on the input of language materials. Acoording to output theory developing language ability internally is a time-consuming and challenging process that must be corrected constantly. It possible to improve word acquisition by providing learners with comprehensible input that is slightly above their current language level (i+1). It crucial that foreign language learners receive input that is understandable (Krashen, 1985; Loschky, 1994).According to the results of this study, rich language input can improve vocabulary comprehension and memory, while active output can facilitate the consolidation and flexible use of vocabulary learned. It is stressed in the study that input and output are complementary in the acquisition of vocabulary. Therefore, both factors should be considered when learning a language to ensure that students learn efficiently.
Downloads
References
[1] Akbarian, I. (2010). Review of the book vocabulary matrix: Understanding, learning, teaching, by M. McCarthy, A. O„Keeffe, & S. Walsh. ELT Journal, 64(2),243-246.
[2] Chen, C. M., & Chung, C. J. (2008). Personalized mobile English vocabulary learning system based on item response theory and learning memory cycle. Computers & Education, 51(2), 624-645.
[3] Elley, W.B. (1989). Vocabulary acquisition from listening to stories. Reading Research Quarterly, 24, 174–87.
[4] Ellis, R. (1993). Naturally simplified input, comprehension and second language acquisition. In M.L. Tickoo (Ed.), Simplification: Theory and application (pp. 53–68). Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Centre.
[5] Ellis, N. (2002). Frequency effects in language processing: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 24, 143–188.
[6] Erlam, R. (2003). Evaluating the relative effectiveness of structured-input and output-based instruction in foreign language learning. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 25, 559–82.
[7] Gass, S., & Varonis, M. (1994). Input, interaction, and second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 283–302
[8] Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon: Oxford.
[9] Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.
[10] Loschky, L. (1994). Comprehensible input and second language acquisition: What is the relationship? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 303–23.
[11] Nagata, H., Aline, D., & Ellis, R. (1999). Modified Input, language aptitude and the acquisition of word meanings. In R. Ellis (Ed.), Learning a second language through interaction (pp. 133–49). Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
[12] Nation, P., & Newton, J. (1997). Teaching vocabulary. In M. H. Long & J. C.
[13] Richards & J. Coady & T. Huckin (Vol. Eds.), Second language vocabulary acquisition. The Cambridge applied linguistics series (pp. 238-254). New York: Cambridge University Press
[14] Ruutmets, K. (2005). Vocabulary learning strategies in studying English as a foreign language. Master‟s thesis. Retrieved from http://www.utlib.ee/ekollekt/diss/mag/2005/b17557100/ruutmets.pdf
[15] Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235–253). Rowley, MA: NewburyHouse.
[16] Swain, M. (1995). Three functions of output in second language learning. In G. Cook & B. Seidlhofer (Eds.), Principle andpractice in applied linguistics: Studies in honour ofH. G. Widdowson (pp. 125– 144)). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
[17] Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processing they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16,371–391.
Downloads
- Views: 2 | Downloads: 2 PDF
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 International Journal of Social Science and Education Research
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.