Construction of Evaluation Indicator System for Acceptance of Soft Science and Technology Projects in Tobacco Industry based on OKR

Ming Wei; Ziyi Gao; Yunpeng Mei; Chao Chen; Yimin Wang

doi:10.54691/zcfarq86

Authors

Ming Wei
Ziyi Gao
Yunpeng Mei
Chao Chen
Yimin Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/zcfarq86

Keywords:

Objectives and Key Results; Acceptance Evaluation Indicator; Soft Science and Technology Project; Entropy Method; Tobacco Industry.

Abstract

Soft science and technology projects are one of the basic organizational forms of scientific and technological activities, being the process of generating, accumulating, and applying new knowledge.The evaluation of science and technology project is a key stage in the process of science and technology project management. In the new development stage, it is urgent to speed up the formation of a comprehensive innovative management system. Constructing an acceptance evaluation indicator system of soft science and technology projects is an important link to deepen the management of science and technology projects. Based on the OKR (Objectives and Key Results) method and combined with the characteristics of soft science projects, the acceptance evaluation objectives such as schedule, quality, cost, and team management are proposed. The evaluation objectives are transformed into quantifiable key outcome indicators, and a system of evaluation indicators for soft science and technology project acceptance in tobacco industry is constructed. Field research is carried out in the tobacco industry, using the entropy value method to assign weights to the evaluation indicators, with a view to providing a decision-making basis for the acceptance evaluation of the scientific and technological project management departments, and accelerating the formation of new quality productivity in the tobacco industry.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Donglin Song, Binghai Fu, Heng Tang: Construction of Indicator System for Evaluation on Technology Project Process Management Based on Full Life-Cycle Perspective, Scientific Management Research, 29(2011) No.1, p.32-36+52.

[2] Zhibo Wang, Xinzhang Zheng, Chuanfang Yu, et al: Evaluation of Whole Process Management of Tobacco R&D Projects, Acta Tabacaria Sinica, 21(2015) No.1, p.107-111.

[3] Liquan Niu, Xi Li, Xuesong Wang, et al: Research on Post-evaluation Method of Enterprise Science and Technology Project, Science and Technology Management Research, 38 (2018) No.14, p.57-60.

[4] Linna Guo, Dong Yan, Zhu Huo: Study on the Whole Life Cycle Evaluation System of "Horse Racing System" Science and Technology Project, Studies in Science of Science, 42(2024) No.9, p.1917-1927.

[5] Aihua Zhang, Minghui Huang: Construction of Soft Science Project Performance Evaluation Indicator System, Statistics & Decision, 35(2019) No.10, p.32-35.

[6] Haijiang Geng, Xianglan Liu, Haitao Sun: Performance Evaluation Indicator System of Major Scientific and Technological Projects of Coal Enterprises, Journal of China Coal Society, 48(2023) No.S1, p.401-410.

[7] Chao Li, Yudong Zhang, Chunyu Song, et al: Research on the Construction of Performance Evaluation Indicator System for Agricultural Science and Technology Projects in Liaoning Province, Agricultural Economy,(2024) No.03, p.121-123.

[8] Niven P R, Lamorte B. Objectives and Key Results: Driving Focus, Alignment and Engagement with OKRs (John Wiley & Sons, Amrican 2016).

[9] Jiangtao Chen, Jianqiu Lv, Xingguo Tian, et al: Research on Evaluation of Science and Technology Innovation Capability of Guangdong Province Based on Entropy Method, Science and Technology Management Research, 38(2018) No.12, p.119-126.