Beyond Overcompetition: A Data-Driven Framework to Diagnose and Project Involution in China's Manufacturing Sector

Authors

  • Xinyuan Xu
  • Yijia Zhu
  • Yuanye Zheng

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/t3w43p31

Keywords:

Involution-style Competition, CRITIC-Entropy Weighting, TOPSIS Evaluation, Prophet Forecasting, Chinese Manufacturing, Innovation Capacity.

Abstract

This study develops an integrated analytical framework to assess and predict "involution-style" competition among Chinese enterprises, combining CRITIC-Entropy weighting, TOPSIS evaluation, and Prophet time-series forecasting. By systematically analyzing inter-indicator conflicts, innovation metrics, and market dynamics, we identify high-weight factors that mitigate involution and structural drivers that exacerbate it. Sectoral analysis reveals divergent patterns, with traditional industries trapped in moderate involution while light-asset models enable escape pathways. Prophet projections forecast intensifying involution through 2028 due to global trade tensions and domestic consumption weakness. The findings highlight the urgency of multidimensional policy interventions to break destructive competition cycles during China's economic transition.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Fan, J. F., & Lin, J. (2010). Fuzzy Comprehensive Evaluation of Malignant Competition in Traditional Enterprise Clusters Based on Entropy Weight. Science of Science and Management of S.& T., 31(5), 178-182.

[2] Fu, W. Z., & Chu, L. P. (2020). Evaluation of High-Quality Development in Manufacturing from the Perspective of Yangtze River Delta Integration: A TOPSIS Model Based on Improved CRITIC-Entropy Weight Combination. Journal of Industrial Technological Economics, 39(9), 145-152.

[3] Guo, K. S. (2022). China's Exploration and Innovation in Breaking Structural Constraints. Social Sciences in China, (10), 78-98+205-206.

[4] Jiang, J., & Zhang, B. Y. (2022). Deconstruction and Transformation: A Political Economy Analysis of China's Industrial Policies. Academic Monthly, 54(12), 59-70.

[5] Liu, Z. B. (2023). Cultivating Long-Term Development Forces to Overcome the Middle-Income Technology Trap. National Governance, (12), 38-42.

[6] Liu, Z. B., & Wang, B. (2024). The Mechanism and Solution to "Involutionary" Malignant Competition in China's Manufacturing Industry. Research on Financial and Economic Issues, (12), 3-15.

[7] Tang, X. H., & Su, M. M. (2003). Benchmarking and Cluster Analysis of Industrial Overcompetition. China Industrial Economics, (6), 29-35.

[8] Wang, H. Y., & Zhang, Z. B. (2025). "Involutionary" Competition: Manifestations, Causes, and Governance. Reform, (3), 11-21.

[9] Wang, Y. (2019). Research on the Regional Economic Development Effects of Characteristic Industrial Clusters. Straits Science and Technology & Industry, (5), 5-11.

[10] Wu, Z., Guan, J., & He, J. (2019). Empirical Research on Minimum Wage Standard Measurement: A Dynamic Combination Model Based on CRITIC-Entropy Objective Weighting. Modern Economic Science, 41(3), 103-117.

Downloads

Published

2025-06-18

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Xu, Xinyuan, Yijia Zhu, and Yuanye Zheng. 2025. “Beyond Overcompetition: A Data-Driven Framework to Diagnose and Project Involution in China’s Manufacturing Sector”. Scientific Journal of Economics and Management Research 7 (6): 64-74. https://doi.org/10.54691/t3w43p31.