Study on Farmers' Microcredit Risk Cognition and Response Behavior

Authors

  • Yilin Li

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/515j3m26

Keywords:

Microfinance, Farmer Risk Perception, Behavioral Finance, Theory of Planned Behavior, Rural Finance.

Abstract

As an important financial tool to support the development of "agriculture, rural areas and farmers", microcredit has played a positive role in alleviating farmers' capital shortages and promoting agricultural production and rural economic development. However, in the actual operation process, farmers generally have problems such as insufficient risk awareness and lack of coping mechanisms in their credit behavior, which easily lead to risk events such as credit default and fund mismatch. Based on the theory of planned behavior, information asymmetry theory and behavioral finance, this paper constructs an analytical framework for farmers' microcredit risk cognition and coping behavior, systematically explores farmers' cognitive level of environmental risk, credit risk and operational risk, and identifies their behavioral paths and influencing mechanisms in risk coping. Through literature review and theoretical analysis, this paper finds that existing research mainly focuses on risk control of financial institutions, and pays insufficient attention to individual behavior of farmers, especially in the western region. The research of this paper not only enriches the theoretical exploration in the field of rural financial risk behavior, but also provides a reference for the formulation of more effective risk intervention policies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Li Jianjun. Analysis of risk control mechanism in microcredit[J]. China Finance, 2020(12): 112–114. (in Chinese)

[2] Giné, X., & Karlan, D. (2014). Group versus individual liability: Short and long term evidence from Philippine microcredit lending groups. Journal of Development Economics, 107, 65–83.

[3] Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.

[4] Wang Xu. Research on risk cognition in farmers’ financial behavior[J]. Agricultural Technology Economy, 2021(10): 99–106. (in Chinese)

[5] Xu Ruilin. Research on farmers’ agricultural insurance participation behavior[J]. Agricultural Economic Issues, 2020(8): 63–70. (in Chinese)

[6] Barberis, N., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. (2001). A model of investor sentiment. Journal of Financial Economics, 49(3), 307–343.

[7] Stiglitz, J. E., & Weiss, A. (1981). Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. American Economic Review, 71(3), 393–410.

[8] Wang Lei. Research on farmers’ credit default behavior and prevention countermeasures[J]. Financial Theory and Practice, 2019(1): 88–91. (in Chinese)

[9] Liu Junyong. Analysis of irrational behavior and deviations in farmers’ credit selection[J]. Rural Finance Research, 2021(6): 27–33. (in Chinese)

[10] Hou Dan. Research on farmers' green credit willingness from the perspective of planned behavior theory[J]. Rural Economy, 2022(7): 101–109. (in Chinese)

[11] Armendáriz, B., & Morduch, J. (2010). The Economics of Microfinance (2nd ed.). MIT Press.

[12] Li Xiaoyun. Microcredit and rural development[J]. Chinese Rural Economy, 2019(3): 41–52. (in Chinese)

[13] Dercon, S. (2002). Income risk, coping strategies, and safety nets. World Bank Research Observer, 17(2), 141–166.

[14] Wenner, M. (2002). Managing credit risk in rural financial institutions. IFAD Working Paper.

Downloads

Published

2025-09-23

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Li, Yilin. 2025. “Study on Farmers’ Microcredit Risk Cognition and Response Behavior”. Scientific Journal of Economics and Management Research 7 (9): 59-66. https://doi.org/10.54691/515j3m26.