Policy Effects of Accelerated Depreciation of Fixed Assets on Corporate Financial Performance and Supply Chain Spillover: Evidence from a Quasi-Natural Experiment

Jingling Wang

doi:10.54691/7yzfp127

Authors

Jingling Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/7yzfp127

Keywords:

Accelerated Depreciation of Fixed Assets, corporate financial performance, supply chain spillover effect, investment efficiency, difference-in-differences method.

Abstract

Based on the data of China’s A-share listed companies from 2008 to 2023, this study takes the accelerated depreciation policy of fixed assets from 2014 to 2015 as a quasi-natural experiment. It adopts the difference-in-differences (DID) method to identify the direct impact of policies on the financial performance of enterprises and their spillover effects along the supply chain. The findings reveal that: (1) The policy led firms to over-invest and expand production, which reduced how efficiently resources were allocated and hurt overall financial outcomes. (2) As firms cut back on purchasing, upstream suppliers faced tighter cash flow and saw their performance decline. (3) Simultaneously, part of the pressure was pushed downstream. Companies raised prices and lowered service levels, which squeezed margins and weakened the profits of downstream partners. These results point to the importance of more carefully designed policies. They also give firms useful guidance on how to adjust investment and financial decisions when responding to fiscal incentives.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Acemoglu, D., Carvalho, V. M., Ozdaglar, A., & Tahbaz-Salehi, A. (2012). The network origins of aggregate fluctuations. Econometrica, 80(5), 1977–2016.

[2] Boissay, F., & Gropp, R. (2013). Payment defaults and interfirm liquidity provision. Review of Finance, 17(6), 1853–1894.

[3] Eichfelder, S., Jacob, M., & Schneider, K. (2023). Do tax incentives reduce investment quality?. Social Science Electronic Publishing.

[4] Fan, Z., & Liu, Y. (2020). Tax compliance and investment incentives: Firm responses to accelerated depreciation in China. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 176, 1–17.

[5] Garcia-Appendini, E., & Montoriol-Garriga, J. (2013). Firms as liquidity providers: Evidence from the 2007–2008 financial crisis. Journal of Financial Economics, 109(1), 272–291.

[6] Henningsen, A. , Henningsen, G. , & Edwin, V. D. W. (2019). Capital-labour-energy substitution in a nested ces framework: a replication and update of kemfert (1998). Energy Economics, 16-25.

[7] Jacobson, T., & von Schedvin, E. (2015). Trade credit and the propagation of corporate failure: An empirical analysis. Econometrica, 83(4), 1315–1371.

[8] Jorgenson, D. W. (1963). “Capital theory and investment behaviour”. American Economic Review.

[9] Liu, X., Liu, J., Wu, H., & Hao, Y. (2022). Do tax reductions stimulate firm productivity? A quasi-natural experiment from China. Economic Systems, 46(4), 101024.

[10] Fan, W., & Hu, M. (2020). Accelerated depreciation of fixed assets and “borrowing short, investing long.” Economic Management, 42(10), 174–191.

[11] Kong, D., Ji, M., & Zhou, Y. (2021). Accelerated depreciation of fixed assets and corporate overcapacity. Finance & Trade Economics, 42(09), 50–65.

[12] Li, X., & Shi, Y. (2016). Green development, carbon information disclosure quality, and financial performance. Economic Management (7), 14.

[13] Liu, X., & Liu, Y. (2019). Leverage, short-term debt used for long-term investment, and firm performance. Economic Research Journal, 54(07), 127–141.