Research on the Impact of Algorithmic Bias in Different Categories on Consumers' Intention to Use
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/ntq33q58Keywords:
Intelligent Services; Algorithmic Bias; Consumer’s Intention.Abstract
The emergence of algorithmic bias leads to unfair decision outcomes for consumers. However, due to the complexity and opacity of algorithms, the phenomenon of algorithmic bias has become widespread, thus drawing attention to related issues in the field of intelligent services. Currently, most studies have discussed the causes and specific manifestations of algorithmic bias conceptually, but few scholars have investigated the different categories of algorithmic bias in intelligent service algorithms and their differential impacts on consumers' intention. Clarifying the reasons for the differences and their underlying mechanisms can supplement the theoretical basis of current research on algorithmic bias in intelligent services and provide guidance for enterprise services. Therefore, studying the impact of intelligent service algorithmic bias on consumers' intention to use is of great significance. This paper explores the differences in the impact of different categories of algorithmic bias on consumers' intention to use. This study proves that compared with the application bias, the contextual bias leads to lower intention to use among consumers. This is because the contextual bias induces consumers to have stronger suspicion, which results in a lower intention to use such intelligent services.
Downloads
References
[1] KAMOONPURI S Z, SENGAR A. Hi, May AI help you? An analysis of the barriers impeding the implementation and use of artificial intelligence-enabled virtual assistants in retail. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 2023, 72, p. 103258.
[2] BENJAMIN V G, DENNIS H, TOBIAS F. Overcoming the pitfalls and perils of algorithms: A classification of machine learning biases and mitigation methods. Journal of Business Research, 2022, Vol. 144, p. 93-106.
[3] JIANG F, JIANG Y, ZHI H, et al. Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future. Stroke and vascular neurology, 2017, Vol. 2 (No. 4), p. 230-243.
[4] FAVARETTO M, DE CLERCQ E, ELGER B S. Big Data and discrimination: Perils, promises and solutions. A systematic review. Journal of Big Data, 2019, Vol. 6 (No. 1), p. 12.
[5] SUMMERS C A, SMITH R W, RECZEK R W. An audience of one: Behaviorally targeted ads as implied social labels. Journal of Consumer Research, 2016, Vol. 43 (No. 1), p. 156-178.
[6] AKTER S, DWIVEDI Y K, SAJIB S, et al. Algorithmic bias in machine learning-based marketing models. Journal of Business Research, 2022, Vol. 144, p. 201-216.
[7] BINNS R, VAN KLEEK M, VEALE M, et al. 'It's Reducing a Human Being to a Percentage' Perceptions of Justice in Algorithmic Decisions//Proceedings of the 2018 Chi conference on human factors in computing systems. 2018, p. 1-14.
[8] LEE M K. Understanding perception of algorithmic decisions: Fairness, trust, and emotion in response to algorithmic management. Big Data & Society, 2018, Vol. 5 (No. 1), p. 2053951718756684.
[9] FOREH M R, GRIER S. When is honesty the best policy? The effect of stated company intent on consumer skepticism. Journal of consumer psychology, 2003, Vol. 13 (No. 3), p. 349-356.
[10] VANHAMME J, GROBBEN B. “Too good to be true!”. The effectiveness of CSR history in countering negative publicity. Journal of Business Ethics, 2009, Vol. 85, p. 273-283.
[11] KOMIAK S Y X, BENBASAT I. A Two-Process View of Trust and Distrust Building in Recommendation Agents: A Process-Tracing Study. Journal of the Association for lnformation Systems, 2008, Vol. 9 (No. 12), p. 727-747
[12] AHMAD W, JIN S. Modeling Consumer Distrust of Online Hotel Reviews. lntenational Journal of Hospitality Management, 2018, 71(4), p. 77-90.
[13] PIZZI G, VANNUCCI V, MAZZOLI V, et al. I, chatbot! the impact of anthropomorphism and gaze direction on willingness to disclose personal information and behavioral intentions. Psychology & Marketing, 2023, Vol. 40 (No. 7), p. 1372-1387.
[14] CAMPBELL M C. When attention-getting advertising tactics elicit consumer inferences of manipulative intent: The importance of balancing benefits and investments[J]. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1995, Vol. 4 (No. 3): p. 225-254.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Scientific Journal of Economics and Management Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




