Designing Strategy-Proof Auctions: A Game Theory, Mechanism Design, and Computational Perspective
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/qvmfdz66Keywords:
Auction theory, VCG mechanism, GSP auction, mechanism design, computational complexity, digital advertising.Abstract
This paper examines the evolution of auction design from ancient traditions to modern digital markets, focusing on the development of strategy-proof mechanisms that incentivize truthful bidding. The research analyzes classical formats including first-price and English auctions, highlighting their strategic limitations, before exploring the Vickrey-Clarke-Groves (VCG) mechanism which achieves dominant-strategy incentive compatibility through externality pricing. The study then empirically contrasts Google's Generalized Second-Price (GSP) auction with Meta's VCG-inspired approach in digital advertising markets. Cost-per-click analysis reveals an average premium of $1.52 in GSP auctions, with industry-specific variations reaching $3.88. A computational complexity analysis demonstrates that GSP achieves O(n log n) time complexity compared to VCG's O(nk), providing algorithmic justification for GSP's prevalence in latency-sensitive real-time bidding environments. These findings suggest that real-world mechanism selection depends critically on the interplay between theoretical properties, market structure, and computational constraints. CCS CONCEPTS Theory of computation~Theory and algorithms for application domains~Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design~Computational pricing and auctions.
Downloads
References
[1] R. Cassady. 1967. Auctions and Auctioneering. University of California Press.
[2] Federal Communications Commission. 2021. Auction 107 (C-Band) Results.
[3] P. Klemperer. 2004. Auctions: Theory and Practice. Princeton University Press.
[4] R. Wilson. 1969. Competitive Bidding with Disparate Information. Management Science 15 (1969), 446–448.
[5] R. Myerson. 1981. Optimal Auction Design. Mathematics of Operations Research 6, 1 (1981), 58–73.
[6] W. Vickrey. 1961. Counterspeculation, Auctions, and Competitive Sealed Tenders. Journal of Finance 16, 1 (1961), 8–37.
[7] E. Clarke. 1971. Multipart Pricing of Public Goods. Public Choice 11 (1971), 17–33.
[8] T. Groves. 1973. Incentives in Teams. Econometrica 41, 4 (1973), 617–631.
[9] J. Green and J.-J. Laffont. 1977. Incentives in Public Decision Making. North-Holland.
[10] L. Ausubel and P. Milgrom. 2006. The Lovely but Lonely Vickrey Auction. In Combinatorial Auctions. MIT Press, 17–40.
[11] M. Rothkopf, A. Pekeč, and R. Harstad. 1998. Computationally Manageable Combinatorial Auctions. Management Science 44, 8 (1998), 1131–1147.
[12] S. Yuan, J. Wang, and X. Zhao. 2013. Real-time Bidding for Online Advertising: Measurement and Analysis. In ADKDD'13. ACM, 1–8.
[13] B. Edelman, M. Ostrovsky, and M. Schwarz. 2007. Internet Advertising and the Generalized Second-Price Auction. American Economic Review 97, 1 (2007), 242–259.
[14] E. Capen, R. Clapp, and W. Campbell. 1971. Competitive Bidding in High-Risk Situations. Journal of Petroleum Technology 23 (1971), 641–653.
[15] N. Feldman and Z. He. 2021. Treasury Auction Design. Journal of Finance 76, 6 (2021), 2819–2862.
[16] P. Bajari and A. Hortacsu. 2003. Economic Insights from Internet Auctions. Journal of Economic Literature 42 (2003), 457–486.
[17] P. Cramton. 2013. Spectrum Auction Design. Review of Industrial Organization 42, 2 (2013), 161–190.
[18] Art Basel & UBS. 2023. Global Art Market Report.
[19] P. Pal. 2023. Sponsored Search Auction and Revenue-Maximizing Number of Ads per Page. CESifo Working Paper No. 10299.
[20] N. Nisan, T. Roughgarden, E. Tardos, and V. Vazirani. 2007. Algorithmic Game Theory. Cambridge University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Scientific Journal of Economics and Management Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




