Research on the Construction of Typical Application Scenarios of Artificial Intelligence in Wuzhou from the Perspective of New Quality Productive Forces
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/gqt2yq45Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence; Typical Application Scenarios; Wuzhou; New Quality Productive Forces; Policy Recommendations.Abstract
With the breakthrough development of generative artificial intelligence technology, AI is transforming from a technological novelty into a core productivity engine. As an important industrial city in Guangxi, Wuzhou boasts distinctive industries, including renewable energy, Liubao tea, and artificial gemstones. However, its overall level of digitalization and intelligentization remains low, and the traditional factor-driven development model is no longer sustainable. There is an urgent need to develop new quality productive forces and drive industrial transformation and upgrading via AI technology. Based on a review of the connotation and classification of typical AI application scenarios, and drawing on the experience of advanced cities both at home and abroad, like Singapore, Shenzhen, and Hangzhou, this study deeply analyzes five major problems facing Wuzhou in promoting the construction of AI application scenarios: the lack of exploration of scenario demands, the weak technical supply capacity, the underutilized value of data elements, the shortage of professional talents, and the inadequate social awareness. In response to these problems, this paper suggests a systematic approach to countermeasures, including deepening industrial integration, strengthening technical supply, activating data value, enhancing talent cultivation and introduction, and improving social awareness. The goal is to offer a theoretical foundation and a practical route for building AI applications that are replicable, scalable, and typical in Wuzhou, so that the city can exploit new technological opportunities and achieve high-quality development.
Downloads
References
[1] Xiang, B. W., & Zhang, D. (2026). The generation mechanism and advanced strategies of new human capital empowered by high education. Journal of Higher Education Management, 20(02), 103–112.
[2] Huang, S. J., & Du, Y. Y. (2026). AI for science for good: cultivating a sound and orderly development ecosystem. Journal of Dalian University of Technology (Social Sciences), 47(02), 122–128.
[3] Li, T. Y., & Wu, J. Y. (2026). Mechanisms and modes in AI for science (AI4S) research: a perspective from knowledge production modes. Studies in Science of Science, 44(02), 235–244.
[4] He, Z. H., & Lu, X. (2026). Artificial intelligence for science: enhancing the application value of research outcomes. Studies in Science of Science, 44(04), 701–712.
[5] Wang, F. (2025). Artificial intelligence leading the paradigm shift of scientific research. Red Flag Manuscript, (10), 45–48.
[6] Hekkert, M., Janssen, M., Wesseling, J., et al. (2020). Mission-oriented innovation systems. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions, 34, 76–79.
[7] Wang, C., Zhang, C. H., Yao, H. L., et al. (2023). Mission-oriented innovation policy: framework, theory and practice. Studies in Science of Science, 41(01), 30–37.
[8] Ren, X. N., & Guo, S. F. (2025). The development of mission-oriented innovation policy and its research directions in the context of China. Science and Technology Management Research, 45(02), 41–52.
[9] Li, P., & Cai, Y. Z. (2014). Each major science and technology plan in New China and construction of national innovation system: analysis of the transformation from the perspective of innovation system theory. Seeking Truth, 41(05), 45–55.
[10] Xu, W., Yang, Z. T., & Wang, N. N. (2020). Development trajectory and strategic path of scientific and technological innovation in China: based on the perspective of national innovation system theory. China University Science & Technology, (09), 8–12.
[11] Yuan, Y. (2025, December 3). Can the Genesis Mission create a new era of artificial intelligence in the United States? China Youth Daily, p. 004.
[12] Kattel, R., & Mazzucato, M. (2018). Mission-oriented innovation policy and dynamic capabilities in the public sector. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(5), 787–801.
[13] Chen, K. H., Wen, X., Liu, X. Y., et al. (2025). The research on paradigm shift of scientific research driven by digital intelligence. Science of Science and Management of S. & T., 46(08), 54–68.
[14] Wu, N. Z., Chen, E. L., & Wu, Y. (2024). Organized teaching and research: orderly evolution of teacher training in an artificial intelligence environment. E-Education Research, 45(01), 122–128.
[15] Xiang, B. W., & Zhao, J. F. (2024). Accelerated transformation and diversified development: the action path and practical logic of ExcellenceES in France. University Education Science, (04), 76–87.
[16] Jennifer, C., Peter, C., & Darren, R. (2021). Speeding up to keep up: exploring the use of AI in the research process. AI & Society, 37(4), 1439–1457.
[17] Li, L., & Liu, M. D. (2024). AI for science as a scientific research paradigm revolution: situation and future. Exploration and Free Views, (10), 143–151.
[18] Wang, F. Y., & Miao, Q. H. (2023). Novel paradigm for AI-driven scientific research: from AI4S to intelligent science. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 38(04), 536–540.
[19] Tang, Y. J. (2025). Productivity paradox of artificial intelligence development and its solutions. Academics, (08), 62–69.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Scientific Journal of Economics and Management Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




