The Theoretical Mechanism and Reform Path of Fiscal Vertical Imbalance on the Gap between Urban and Rural Areas in Counties
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/s129mk07Keywords:
Vertical Fiscal Imbalance; County Urban-rural Gap; Urban Expenditure Preference; Equalization of Public Services; Feasible Capability.Abstract
Narrowing the gap between urban and rural areas in counties is the core task of realizing rural revitalization and common prosperity. The vertical fiscal imbalance between cities and counties at the level of the fiscal system is the deep institutional root that leads to the widening gap between urban and rural areas.Based on the theories of fiscal decentralization, fiscal competition, urban-rural dual structure, urban-rural integration development, and feasible ability, this paper constructs a systematic theoretical analysis framework.The study finds that the vertical fiscal imbalance between cities and counties leads to the structural imbalance of basic public service allocation such as education and medical care by strengthening the fiscal pressure of county-level governments and under the superposition of the asymmetry of urban and rural public service supply costs, and ultimately weakens rural residents. The feasible ability to improve income and well-being, thereby solidifying and expanding the multi-dimensional urban-rural gap in the county.This paper further analyzes the correction function of transfer payments in theory and the multiple reasons for their failure in reality, and puts forward some reform paths, such as deepening the reform of the financial system below the provincial level, optimizing the structure of transfer payments, and strengthening the supervision of budget performance. This study provides a new theoretical perspective for understanding the urban-rural gap under Chinese fiscal decentralization.
Downloads
References
[1] The Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, & The State Council. (2025, April 7). Plan for Accelerating the Construction of a Strong Agricultural Nation (2024–2035) [EB/OL]. https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/2025/issue_11986/202504/content_7019260.html
[2] Wagner, R. E. (1973). The fiscal organization of collective activity: a public choice perspective. Public Finance Quarterly, 1(2), 143–156.
[3] Hunter, J. S. (1977). Tax sharing and the measurement of state-local fiscal capacity: the representative tax system versus the tax base approach. Proceedings of the Annual Conference on Taxation under the Auspices of the National Tax Association, 143–151.
[4] Sharma, C. K. (2007). A situational theory of transfer of joint taxes: the case of vertical fiscal imbalance in Australia. International Review of Public Administration, 12(1), 51–70.
[5] Sun, K. (1998). The role of local finance in the tax-sharing system. Research on Financial Issues, (1), 29–34.
[6] Chu, D., & Shao, J. (2018). Vertical fiscal imbalance, public expenditure structure, and economic growth. Economic Theory and Economic Management, (10), 30–43.
[7] Todaro, M. P. (1969). A model of labor migration and urban unemployment in less developed countries. American Economic Review, 59(1), 138–148.
[8] Fei, J., & Larnis. (2004). Growth and development: An evolutionary perspective (Y. Hong & J. Zheng, Trans.). The Commercial Press.
[9] Tiebout, C. M. (1956). A pure theory of local expenditures. Journal of Political Economy, 64(5), 416–424.
[10] Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal Federalism. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
[11] Montinola, G., Qian, Y., & Weingast, B. R. (1995). Federalism, Chinese style: the political basis for economic success in China. World Politics, 48(1), 50–81.
[12] Rodden, J. (2006). Hamilton's Paradox: The Promise and Peril of Fiscal Federalism. Cambridge University Press.
[13] Lewis, W. A. (1954). Economic development with unlimited supplies of labour. Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 22(2), 139–191.
[14] Ranis, G., & Fei, J. C. (1961). A theory of economic development. American Economic Review, 51(4), 533–558.
[15] Zhao, D., & Cui, J. (2023). Re-measuring the multidimensional urban-rural gap: spatiotemporal variations and influencing factors. Journal of South China Agricultural University (Social Sciences Edition), (5), 1–15.
[16] The Central Committee of the Communist Party of China, & The State Council. (2019, May 5). Opinions on Establishing and Improving the Mechanisms, Systems, and Policy Framework for Integrated Urban-Rural Development [EB/OL]. https://www.gov.cn/gongbao/content/2019/content_5392288.htm
[17] Wu, Y. (2017). Bias in Investment under Chinese-style Decentralization. Economic Research, 52(6), 137–152.
[18] EN, A. (1999). Development as Freedom. Oxford University Press.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Scientific Journal of Economics and Management Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




