The Impact of ESG Rating Divergence on Stock Price Synchronicity: Unraveling the Mediating Role of Analyst Dispersion
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/dvhgb840Keywords:
ESG Divergence; Stock Price Synchronicity; Analyst Dispersion.Abstract
Based on the sample of A-shared listed companies in China’s Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets from 2018 to 2023, this paper employs data of the ESG rating from five agencies. It empirically explores how divergence in the ESG ratings influences the stock price synchronicity, with analyst dispersion serving as the mediating factors in the relationship .The estimation outcomes reveal that greater divergence across ESG ratings will lead to a significant increase in the stock price synchronicity. As information intermediaries, analysts can effectively alleviate the noise caused bu divergent ESG ratings, thus exerting a masking effect. The mechanism test indicates that the reduction in stock turnover is also an essential transmission channel through which divergence of ESG ratings excert an impact on the stock price synchronicity. Heterogeneity analysis shows that information environment and market attention constitute a crucial part in the delivery and transmission of ESG information. The paper highlights the necessity of developing an integrated and standardized ESG rating system. Meanwhile, it is necessary to guide the standardized development of the analyst industry, strengthen its role as an information intermediary in order to enhance the efficiency of the capital market.
Downloads
References
[1] Hartzmark, S. M., & Sussman, A. B. (2019). Do investors value sustainability? A natural experiment examining ranking and fund flows. Journal of Finance, 74(6), 2789–2837.
[2] Chatterji, A. K., Durand, R., Levine, D. I., & Touboul, S. (2016). Do ratings of firms converge? Implications for managers, investors and strategy researchers. Strategic Management Journal, 37(8), 1597–1614.
[3] Sun, J. X., Tan, W. J., & Guo, F. (2024). Re-evaluation of mainstream ESG ratings in China. Journal of Finance and Economics, 50(5), 4–18, 78.
[4] Berg, F., Kölbel, J. F., & Rigobon, R. (2022). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance, 26(6), 1315–1344.
[5] Ma, W. J., & Yu, B. J. (2023). Enterprise ownership attributes and divergence between Chinese and foreign ESG ratings. Journal of Finance and Economics, 49(6), 124–136.
[6] Serafeim, G., & Yoon, A. (2022). Which corporate ESG news does the market react to? Financial Analysts Journal, 78(1), 59–78.
[7] Xu, N., Chan, K. C., Jiang, X., & Yi, Z. (2013). Do star analysts know more firm-specific information? Evidence from China. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(1), 89–102.
[8] Amit, E., Lev, B., & Sougiannis, T. (1999). What value analysts? Unpublished manuscript.
[9] Yin, P., Li, S., Li, R. Y. M., & Yue, G. X. (2026). ESG rating adjustment disagreement and stock price synchronicity: evidence from China. Research in International Business and Finance, 103261.
[10] Liu, X. H., Wang, J. J., & Su, M. M. (2025). Research on the impact of corporate ESG information disclosure on stock price synchronicity. Journal of Shandong University of Finance and Economics, 37(2), 71–83.
[11] Roll, R. (1988). R². The Journal of Finance, 43(3), 541–566.
[12] Morck, R., Yeung, B., & Yu, W. (2000). The information content of stock markets: Why do emerging markets have synchronous stock price movements? Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1–2), 215–260.
[13] Hou, K., Xiong, W., & Peng, L. (2006). R² and price inefficiency. Fisher College of Business Working Paper.
[14] Wang, Y. P., Liu, H. L., & Wu, L. S. (2009). Information transparency, institutional investors and stock price synchronicity. Journal of Financial Research, 12, 162–174.
[15] Sadka, R., & Sherbina, A. (2007). Analyst disagreement, mispricing, and liquidity. The Journal of Finance, 62(5), 2367–2403.
[16] Piotroski, J. D., & Roulstone, D. T. (2004). The influence of analysts, institutional investors, and insiders on the incorporation of market, industry, and firm-specific information into stock prices. The Accounting Review, 79(4), 1119–1151.
[17] Chan, K., & Hameed, A. (2006). Stock price synchronicity and analyst coverage in emerging markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 80(1), 115–147.
[18] Zhu, H. J., He, X. J., & Tao, L. (2007). Can securities analysts in China improve the efficiency of capital markets? Empirical evidence based on stock price synchronicity and stock price information content. Journal of Financial Research, 2, 110–121.
[19] Yi, Z. H., Li, Y., & Jiang, X. Y. (2015). Female analyst coverage and stock price synchronicity. Journal of Financial Research, 11, 175–189.
[20] Christensen, D. M., Serafeim, G., & Sikochi, A. (2022). Why is corporate virtue in the eye of the beholder? The case of ESG ratings. The Accounting Review, 97(1), 147–175.
[21] Liu, M. (2022). Quantitative ESG disclosure and divergence of ESG ratings. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 936798.
[22] Gibson, B. R., Krueger, P., & Schmidt, P. S. (2021). ESG rating disagreement and stock returns. Financial Analysts Journal, 77(4), 104–127.
[23] Avramov, D., Cheng, S., Lioui, A., & Tarelli, A. (2022). Sustainable investing with ESG rating uncertainty. Journal of Financial Economics, 145(2), 642–664.
[24] Billio, M., Costola, M., Hristova, I., Latino, C., & Pelizzon, L. (2021). Inside the ESG ratings:(Dis) agreement and performance. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 28(5), 1426–1445.
[25] Gabaix, X. (2014). A sparsity-based model of bounded rationality. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(4), 1661–1710.
[26] Sims, C. A. (2003). Implications of rational inattention. Journal of Monetary Economics, 50(3), 665–690.
[27] Veldkamp, L. L. (2006). Information markets and the comovement of asset prices. The Review of Economic Studies, 73(3), 823–845.
[28] Miller, E. M. (1977). Risk, uncertainty, and divergence of opinion. The Journal of Finance, 32(4), 1151–1168.
[29] Grossman, S. J., & Stiglitz, J. E. (1980). On the impossibility of informationally efficient markets. The American Economic Review, 70(3), 393–408.
[30] Barron, O. E., Kim, O., Lim, S. C., & Stevens, D. E. (1998). Using analysts' forecasts to measure properties of analysts' information environment. Accounting Review, 421–433.
[31] Hong, H., & Kubik, J. D. (2003). Analyzing the analysts: Career concerns and biased earnings forecasts. The Journal of Finance, 58(1), 313–351.
[32] Zhang, X. F. (2006). Information uncertainty and analyst forecast behavior. Contemporary Accounting Research, 23(2), 565–590.
[33] Yi, Z. H., Yang, S. Z., & Chen, Q. Y. (2019). Can analysts reduce stock price synchronicity? An empirical study based on text analysis of research reports. China Industrial Economics, 1, 156–173.
[34] Wang, J. T., Tian, B. A., & Shangguan, X. L. (2023). Does ESG rating divergence affect auditors' risk response behavior? From the perspective of key audit matters disclosure. Financial Development Research, 9, 13–21.
[35] Qu, X. H., Lu, Y., & Wang, J. (2016). Goodwill impairment and analyst earnings forecasts: From the perspective of earnings management. Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, 38(4), 101–113.
[36] Liu, X. Q., Yang, Q. Q., & Hu, J. (2023). ESG rating divergence and stock price synchronicity. China Soft Science, 8, 108–120.
[37] Wang, H. C., Cao, F., & Ye, K. T. (2015). Monitoring or tunneling: Shareholding ratio of large shareholders and stock price crash risk. Management World, 2, 45–57, 187.
[38] Chen, H. H., Yin, H. F., Zhang, T. S., & Huang, J. (2024). Does ESG rating divergence affect capital market pricing efficiency? An analysis on the stock price synchronicity of listed companies. J Financ Econ (China), 1(17), 11.
[39] Kyle, A. S. (1985). Continuous auctions and insider trading. Econometrica, 53(6), 1315–1335.
[40] Gilboa, I., & Schmeidler, D. (1989). Maxmin expected utility with non-unique prior. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 18(2), 141–153.
[41] Gibson, R., Krueger, P., & Mitali, S. F. (2020). The sustainability footprint of institutional investors: ESG driven price pressure and performance. Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Scientific Journal of Economics and Management Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




