Can Short Selling Restrain Tunneling by Major Shareholders?

Authors

  • Yaqi Zhang Guangdong University of Petrochemical Technology, Maoming, Guangdong, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/ezzcdj89

Keywords:

Short Selling System; Tunneling by Major Shareholders; External Supervision.

Abstract

Taking the tunneling behavior of major shareholders of Chinese listed companies as the research entry point, this paper systematically examines the external governance effect of the short selling system on restraining such tunneling activities. After the introduction of the short selling system, short sellers can identify clues of major shareholders’ tunneling by virtue of their superior information mining capabilities. Short selling transactions will trigger stock price declines, which increase the magnitude of major shareholders' wealth losses, control rights risks and regulatory costs arising from tunneling. When the benefits of tunneling fail to offset the above-mentioned losses, the short selling mechanism can effectively curb tunneling behaviors. The empirical results of this study support the above logical inference. Moreover, the restraining effect is more pronounced in enterprises featured with weak industry competition and insufficient media supervision. In terms of mechanism, short selling exerts governance effects by improving the quality of information disclosure and intensifying regulatory inquiries. This research demonstrates that the short selling system serves as a vital external governance tool, which can effectively contain the expropriation of interests by major shareholders and protect the rights and interests of minority shareholders.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Boehmer, E., & Wu, J. (2013). Short selling and the price discovery process. The Review of Financial Studies, 26(2), 287–322.

[2] Allen, F., Qian, J., & Qian, M. (2005). Law, finance, and economic growth in China. Journal of Financial Economics, 77(1), 57–116.

[3] Bertrand, M., & Mullainathan, S. (2003). Enjoying the quiet life? Corporate governance and managerial preferences. Journal of Political Economy, 111(5), 1043–1075.

[4] Hou, Q. C., Jin, Q. L., & Su, L., et al. (2017). Relaxing short selling regulations and major shareholders' "extraction". Economics (Quarterly), 16(03), 1143–1172.

[5] Li, W. L., Lü, H. L., & Chen, L. Y. (2008). A study on different control shareholders' methods of "exhausting" control. Journal of Shanxi University of Finance and Economics, (11), 53–58.

[6] Wu, G. D. (2022). Debt financing under major shareholder control: does it curb or facilitate shareholder hollowing out? Journal of Central University of Finance and Economics, (09), 104–117.

[7] Zhang, X. M., Ge, C., & Yang, D. G. (2021). Can internal control mitigate the shareholder hollowing out risk caused by tax avoidance? Journal of Nanjing Audit University, 18(06), 61–69.

[8] Yao, Y. F. (2022). Can the disclosure of key audit matters curb major shareholders' expropriation practices? - Evidence from expropriation related key matters. Shanghai University of Finance and Economics Journal, 24(05), 92–107.

[9] Lu, T. P., & Ma, T. F. (2021). Compensation of independent directors and shareholder drainage by major owners: Incentive or collusion. Financial and Trade Research, 32(12), 94–105.

[10] Johnson, S., La Porta, R., Lopez de Silanes, F., et al. (2000). Tunneling. American Economic Review, 90(2), 22–27.

[11] Jiang, G., Lee, C. M. C., & Yue, H. (2010). Tunneling through intercorporate loans: The China experience. Journal of Financial Economics, 98(1), 1–20.

[12] Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. H. P. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58(1 2), 81–112.

[13] La Porta, R., Lopez de Silanes, F., & Shleifer, A. (2006). What works in securities laws? The Journal of Finance, 61(1), 1–32.

[14] Boehmer, E., Jones, C. M., & Zhang, X. (2008). Which shorts are informed? The Journal of Finance, 63(2), 491–527.

[15] Hart, O. D. (1983). The market mechanism as an incentive scheme. The Bell Journal of Economics, 366–382.

[16] Giroud, X., & Mueller, H. M. (2010). Does corporate governance matter in competitive industries? Journal of Financial Economics, 95(3), 312–331.

[17] Nickell, S. J. (1996). Competition and corporate performance. Journal of Political Economy, 104(4), 724–746.

[18] Jensen, M. C. (1986). Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. The American Economic Review, 76(2), 323–329.

[19] Liu, C., Uchida, K., & Yang, Y. (2012). Corporate governance and firm value during the global financial crisis: Evidence from China. International Review of Financial Analysis, 21, 70–80.

[20] Dyck, A., & Zingales, L. (2002). The corporate governance role of the media. Working paper.

[21] Li, P., & Shen, Y. (2010). The role of media in corporate governance: Empirical evidence from China. Economic Research Journal, 4, 14–27.

[22] Miller, G. S. (2006). The press as a watchdog for accounting fraud. Journal of Accounting Research, 44(5), 1001–1033.

[23] Chen, H., Zhu, Y., & Chang, L. (2019). Short selling constraints and corporate payout policy. Accounting & Finance, 59(4), 2273–2305.

Downloads

Published

2026-08-25

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Zhang, Yaqi. 2026. “Can Short Selling Restrain Tunneling by Major Shareholders?”. Scientific Journal of Economics and Management Research 8 (7): 273-86. https://doi.org/10.54691/ezzcdj89.