Information Fog Or Multi-dimensional Signal? ESG Rating Differences, Information Asymmetry and Stock Price Synchronization

Authors

  • Qing Liu School of Management, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese medicine, Tianjin 301600, China
  • Zhenggang Song School of Management, Tianjin University of Traditional Chinese medicine, Tianjin 301600, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/s1xf5923

Keywords:

ESG rating divergence, stock price synchronization, information asymmetry, institutional investor attention, capital market pricing efficiency.

Abstract

From the perspective of information asymmetry, this paper empirically examines the impact of ESG rating divergence on stock price synchronicity and its mechanisms, using China's A-share listed companies from 2014 to 2024 as a sample. The findings show that: (1) ESG rating divergence significantly reduces stock price synchronicity, indicating that divergence is not pure market noise but provides multi-dimensional firm-specific information increments that promote the incorporation of company-level information into stock prices; (2) institutional investor attention positively moderates this relationship, weakening the inhibiting effect in firms with high institutional ownership; (3) the effect is highly immediate, with delayed effects essentially disappearing; (4) an industry-level network contagion effect exists-peers' rating divergence affects a firm's synchronicity far more than its own, and institutional investor attention can effectively block this contagion path. Contrary to the existing "noise effect" conclusion, this paper reveals the pricing function of ESG rating divergence from an information-increment perspective, providing new empirical evidence on the ESG information environment and capital market pricing efficiency in emerging markets.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Berg, F., Kölbel, J. F., & Rigobon, R. (2022). Aggregate confusion: The divergence of ESG ratings. Review of Finance, 26(6), 1315–1344.

[2] Wang, Z., & Wei, Y. (2026). ESG rating differences: Hidden worries or opportunities? -Based on the perspective of value discovery and risk identification of listed companies. Systems Engineering - Theory & Practice. Advance online publication.

[3] Avramov, D., Cheng, S., Lioui, A., & Pevzner, M. (2022). Sustainable investing with ESG rating uncertainty. Journal of Financial Economics, 145(3), 642–664.

[4] Feng, Y., Guo, X., & Zeng, X. (2024). Differences between ESG information disclosure and ESG rating: Is it a word of public or a word of heart? -Discussing the institutional norms of China's ESG. Accounting Research, (1), 49–63.

[5] Wang, C., Peng, S., & Liu, J. (2025). Can high-quality internal control under the background of “dual carbon” alleviate the differences in ESG ratings. Friends of Accounting, (8), 79–86.

[6] Liu, H., & Zhang, Z. (2023). The impact of managerial myopia on environmental, social and governance (ESG) engagement: Evidence from Chinese firms. Energy Economics, 122, 106705.

[7] DesJardine, M. R., Li, B., & Shi, W. (2023). Information-based competition: The case of rival owners in rating agencies. Academy of Management Journal, 66(1), 221–256.

[8] Kathan, M. C., Utz, S., Dorfleitner, G., & Wimmer, M. (2025). What you see is not what you get: ESG scores and greenwashing risk. Finance Research Letters, 74, 106710.

[9] Sandberg, H., Alnoor, A., & Tiberius, V. (2023). Environmental, social, and governance ratings and financial performance: Evidence from the European food industry. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32, 2471–2489.

[10] Yan, J., Luo, Q., & Li, Z. (2025). Research on the impact of ESG uncertainty and noise on sustainable investment. Systems Engineering - Theory & Practice. Advance online publication.

[11] Zhou, Z., Gu, W., & Yao, Y. (2023). ESG rating difference and analyst surplus forecast accuracy. China Soft Science, (10), 164–176.

[12] Sun, G., Cao, S., & An, J. (2023). Can enterprise ESG performance improve the quality of analysts' surplus forecasts: Empirical evidence from A-share listed companies. Financial Theory Review, (5), 68–77.

[13] Zhang, W., Zhang, J., & Chen, P. (2024). Valuation repair or information confusion? -A study based on multi-party ESG ratings and stock mispricing. Journal of Financial Research, (11), 170–188.

[14] Wang, H., & Niu, M. (2026). Research on the impact of ESG rating differences on equity capital costs. Friends of Accountant, (7), 24–33.

[15] Wang, H., Jiao, S., Ge, C., & Zhang, Y. (2024). Corporate ESG rating divergence and excess stock returns. Energy Economics, 129, 107276.

[16] Sun, G., Yan, Z., Gong, Z., & Li, K. (2025). The impact of ESG rating divergence on stock price crash risk. International Review of Financial Analysis, 102, 104081.

[17] Zhao, H., He, Z., Banerjee, T., & Kumar, S. (2025). ESG rating divergence and firm value: Evidence from China. Applied Economics Letters. Advance online publication.

[18] Zhao, J., Wang, M., Hong, S., & Liu, L. (2025). ESG rating divergence and financing constraints: Evidence from China. Journal of Environmental Management, 389, 126188.

[19] Cao, Y., Tang, Y., & Hu, W. (2025). Research on the impact of ESG rating differences on corporate tax avoidance. Chinese Journal of Management Science. Advance online publication.

[20] Zhou, J., Lei, X., & Yu, J. (2024). ESG rating divergence and corporate green innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 33, 2911–2930.

[21] Mao, Z., Wang, S., & Lin, Y. (2024). ESG, ESG rating divergence and earnings management: Evidence from China. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31, 3328–3347.

[22] Xu, J., Zhang, Y., & Fan, Y. (2023). Company transparency, internal control audit and stock price synchronization. Science Research Management, 44(10), 110–118.

[23] Yang, S., & Cao, Y. (2025). Corporate social responsibility information disclosure and stock price synchronization -Analysis based on NER and TF-IDF text technology. Technology Economics, 44(11), 1–17.

[24] Qi, B., Yang, J., & Liu, X. (2023). The impact of enterprise ESG performance on stock price synchronization. Monthly Journal of Finance and Accounting, (7), 19–28.

[25] Tang, Y., & Shen, X. (2023). The impact of ESG information disclosure on stock price synchronization. The Chinese Certified Public Accountant, (4), 28–34.

[26] Weng, Z., & Lai, Z. (2024). The company's ESG performance and stock market risk prevention -Path analysis based on stock price synchronization. Statistical Research, 41(8), 56–68.

[27] Liu, X., Yang, Q., & Hu, J. (2023). ESG rating differences and stock price synchronization. China Soft Science, (8), 108–120.

[28] Chen, H., Yin, H., & Zhang, T. (2025). Does ESG rating difference affect the pricing efficiency of the capital market? -A study based on the synchronization of listed company stock prices. Journal of Financial Research, 51(5), 65–80.

[29] Krueger, P., Sautner, Z., Tang, D. Y., & Zhong, R. (2024). The effects of mandatory ESG disclosure around the world. Journal of Accounting Research, 62(5), 1795–1840.

[30] Galleli, B., & Amaral, L. (2026). Bridging institutional theory and social and environmental efforts in management: A review and research agenda. Journal of Management, 52(1), 42–93.

Downloads

Published

2026-09-28

Issue

Section

Articles