Record the Temperature of the Era and the Memory of the City with the Lens
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/z2xebn76Keywords:
Urban images, memory of the times, photographic records, urban culture, humanistic temperature.Abstract
Cities are not only composed of buildings, roads and public spaces, but also shaped by people, things and objects living in them. As an important medium for recording reality, photography can transform fleeting life scenes in the process of urban development into visual memories with preservation value. Against the background of the rapid renewal of the city, old streets, old buildings, public transportation, neighbourhood exchanges and the living conditions of ordinary people are constantly changing, and many urban scenes with the characteristics of the times are gradually withdrawing from the reality. Therefore, video recording has a cultural value beyond aesthetic expression. It can not only present the changing trajectory of urban space, but also preserve the life experience of ordinary people, so that the process of the macro era can enter the public's vision in a more specific, real and sensible way. Based on this, the article analyses urban image records, explores the actual value of image records from different levels, and analyses the visual expression of urban memory in combination with image scenes such as streets, characters and daily life. On this basis, it puts forward specific practical paths to preserve the real traces of urban development with the help of the lens, so that Urban stories gain the vitality of continuous dissemination in images.
Downloads
References
[1] Arnold, E. (2019). Aesthetic practices of psychogeography and photography. Geography Compass, 13(2), e12419. https://doi.org/10.1111/gec3.12419
[2] Boyer, M. C. (1994). The city of collective memory: Its historical imagery and architectural entertainments. MIT Press.
[3] Erfani, G. (2021). Visualising urban redevelopment: Photovoice as a narrative research method for investigating redevelopment processes and outcomes. Geoforum, 126, 80–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geoforum.2021.07.021
[4] Hayden, D. (1995). The power of place: Urban landscapes as public history. MIT Press.
[5] Huyssen, A. (2003). Present pasts: Urban palimpsests and the politics of memory. Stanford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1515/9781503620308
[6] Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. MIT Press.
[7] Moore, G., Croxford, B., Adams, M., Refaee, M., Cox, T. J., & Sharples, S. (2008). The photo survey research method: Capturing life in the city. Visual Studies, 23(1), 50–62. https://doi.org/10.1080/14725860801908536
[8] Pauwels, L. (2016). Visually researching and communicating the city: A systematic assessment of methods and resources. International Journal of Communication, 10, 1309–1330.
[9] Pink, S. (2011). Amateur photographic practice, collective representation and the constitution of place. Visual Studies, 26(2), 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1080/1472586X.2011.571884
[10] Tormey, J. (2013). Cities and photography. Routledge.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Scientific Journal of Economics and Management Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




