Research on the Application of an Integrated Outcome Management Model in Joint Research Institutes of Power Grid Enterprises

Shijia Zhou; Jiali Chen; Zhida Huang

doi:10.54691/g7h5a283

Authors

Shijia Zhou Electric Power Research Institute, China Southern Power Grid, Guangzhou 510080, China
Jiali Chen Electric Power Research Institute, China Southern Power Grid, Guangzhou 510080, China
Zhida Huang Electric Power Research Institute, China Southern Power Grid, Guangzhou 510080, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/g7h5a283

Keywords:

Joint research institute, achievement transformation, integrated management, industry-university-research cooperation, evaluation system, power grid enterprise.

Abstract

Against the background of the national innovation-driven development strategy and the "dual-carbon" goals, industry-university-research joint research institutes have become an important carrier for promoting industrial technological progress and achievement transformation. This paper takes the joint research institutes co-built by China Southern Power Grid and 13 universities as the research object and, through an internal and external dual-benchmarking evaluation method, systematically analyzes their operating effectiveness and problems. The study finds that the joint research institutes have achieved remarkable results in project planning and talent cultivation, but still have obvious shortcomings in high-value achievement output, interdisciplinary layout, and high-level talent cultivation. Therefore, this paper innovatively proposes an "integrated achievement management model." Centered on full-chain coverage and multi-level coordination, the model builds a closed-loop management system of "planning-research and development-transformation-evaluation" and, through goal orientation, process reengineering, and mechanism support, realizes effective integration from demand traction to value realization. The study shows that this model can systematically solve bottlenecks in achievement transformation, improve the overall efficiency of the innovation chain, and provide an operable reform paradigm for industry-university-research cooperation in central state-owned enterprises.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Etzkowitz, H., & Leydesdorff, L. (2000). The dynamics of innovation: From national systems and "mode 2" to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29(2), 109–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-6

[2] Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2012). Mode 3 knowledge production in quadruple helix innovation systems. Springer.

[3] Rothwell, R. (1994). Towards the fifth-generation innovation process. International Marketing Review, 11(1), 7–31. https://doi.org/10.1108/02651339410057349

[4] Tidd, J., & Bessant, J. (2020). Managing innovation: Integrating technological, market and organizational change (7th ed.). Wiley.

[5] Li, L., & Zhou, Y. (2015). Research on the construction and operating mechanism of industry-university-research strategic alliances. Science Research Management, 36(3), 1–8.

[6] Chen, J., & Yang, Y. (2012). The theoretical basis and connotation of collaborative innovation. Studies in Science of Science, 30(2), 161–164.

[7] Wang, X., & Wang, H. (2018). Research on evaluation of scientific and technological achievement transformation based on technology readiness. Science of Science and Management of S. & T., 39(5), 45–53.

[8] Zhang, Y., & Lu, J. (2019). Research on a performance evaluation index system for transformation of university scientific and technological achievements. R&D Management, 31(4), 112–121.

[9] Deming, W. E. (1986). Out of the crisis. MIT Press.

[10] Mankins, J. C. (1995). Technology readiness levels: A white paper. National Aeronautics and Space Administration.

[11] Wu, X., & Zhao, Z. (2017). Research on the mechanism of industry-university-research collaborative innovation from the perspective of the innovation chain. Management World, (5), 182–183.