Analysis of China's International Trade and Collaboration Model under the "Belt and Road" Initiative
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/kar41t21Keywords:
Abstract
Since the launch of the Belt and Road Initiative, China’s international economic cooperation has gradually shifted from a traditional model centered on commodity exchange to a more diversified framework involving policy alignment, transport and logistics connectivity, industrial coordination, and digital commerce. This process has not only broadened the scope of China’s external economic engagement, but also strengthened links with partner countries in areas such as ports, rail networks, energy projects, cross-border e-commerce, and overseas industrial parks. In practical terms, intergovernmental policy coordination has provided an institutional basis for smoother economic exchanges, while the improvement of transport infrastructure has enhanced logistics efficiency. At the same time, the continuous expansion of transaction volume has deepened mutual dependence among participating economies. In terms of cooperation patterns, goods exchange remains the basic form, while project-driven economic interaction supported by infrastructure development is becoming increasingly prominent. Meanwhile, coordination across industrial and supply chains has become an important pathway for high-quality development, and cross-border e-commerce has enabled small and medium-sized enterprises as well as distinctive local products to access overseas markets more efficiently. Looking ahead, China should further refine the mechanisms for international economic cooperation under the Belt and Road framework, upgrade the structure of external trade, improve the quality of transport and logistics corridors, and accelerate the development of cross-border e-commerce and digital trade. These efforts will help promote Belt and Road economic cooperation toward a higher-quality, more resilient, and more sustainable stage.
Downloads
References
[1] Zhou, M. (2011). Intensification of geo-cultural homophily in global trade: Evidence from the gravity model. Social Science Research, 40(1), 193–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssresearch.2010.07.002
[2] Eaton, J., & Kortum, S. (2002). Technology, geography, and trade. Econometrica, 70(5), 1741–1779. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00352
[3] Dadakas, D., Kor, S. G., & Fargher, S. (2020). Examining the trade potential of the UAE using a gravity model and a Poisson pseudo maximum likelihood estimator. The Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 29(5), 619–646. https://doi.org/10.1080/09638199.2019.1710551
[4] Wei, S. J. (1996). Intra-national versus international trade: How stubborn are nations in global integration? National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w5531
[5] Huang, R. R. (2007). Distance and trade: Disentangling unfamiliarity effects and transport cost effects. European Economic Review, 51(1), 161–181.
[6] Larson, J., Baker, J., Latta, G., Ohrel, S., & Wade, C. (2018). Modeling international trade of forest products: Application of PPML to a gravity model of trade. Forest Products Journal, 68(3), 303–316. https://doi.org/10.13073/FPJ-D-17-00057
[7] Head, K., & Mayer, T. (2014). Gravity equations: Workhorse, toolkit, and cookbook. In G. Gopinath, E. Helpman, & K. Rogoff (Eds.), Handbook of international economics (Vol. 4, pp. 131–195). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-444-54314-1.00003-3
[8] Thursby, J. G., & Thursby, M. C. (1987). Bilateral trade flows, the Linder hypothesis, and exchange risk. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(3), 488–495. https://doi.org/10.2307/1925537
[9] Das, J., Tanger, S., Kennedy, P. L., & Vlosky, R. P. (2018). Examining the relationship between regulatory quality and forest product exports to India: A gravity model approach. Forest Products Journal, 68(2), 172–181. https://doi.org/10.13073/FPJ-D-17-00022
[10] Srivastava, R. K., & Green, R. T. (1986). Determinants of bilateral trade flows. Journal of Business, 59(4), 623–640. https://doi.org/10.1086/296358
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Scientific Journal of Economics and Management Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




