Multi-factor Quantitative Portfolio Risk-return Collaborative Optimization Model
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/4hvwtk05Keywords:
Multi-factor Quantitative Investment; Risk-return; Collaborative Optimization; Dynamic IC_IR Weighting.Abstract
In the traditional quantitative investment model, the separation of risk and return will lead to tail risk exposure and parameter sensitivity. This paper proposes a multi-factor quantitative portfolio risk-return collaborative optimization model. Construct a risk-benefit cooperative objective function, introduce a gain term based on risk contribution entropy, and upgrade risk diversification from passive constraint to active incentive; The dynamic IC_IR time-varying weighting mechanism is designed, and the factor information coefficient (IC) and information ratio (IR) are calculated by rolling window, and the failure factors are eliminated in real time and the weights are adjusted adaptively. Ledoit-Wolf covariance matrix compression estimation is used to reduce the influence of high-dimensional data noise on the optimization results. Hard constraints such as industry deviation, upper limit of stock weight and maximum retracement warning are embedded, and endogenous optimization of transaction costs is combined to ensure the enforceability of the strategy. The empirical results show that the model has an annualized return of 18.75%, a Sharpe ratio of 1.02, and a maximum drawdown of -22.48% in the Chinese A-share market, which is superior to mean variance optimization (MVO) and IC-IR equal weight combinations. The inter-partition test shows that the model has a robust income and risk control ability in bull-bear conversion, unilateral downside and structural bull market, and the sortino ratio-Kumar ratio advantage highlights its precise management of downside risks.
Downloads
References
[1] Pang, T., Tian, D., & Tian, W. (2026). Optimal portfolio choice with comfortable consumption. SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics, 17(3), 801–840. https://doi.org/10.1137/25M1732222
[2] Bouteska, A., Harasheh, M., & Esposito, G. (2025). Climate transition risk, ESG rating divergence and portfolio performance: Evidence from composite scores and climate-adjusted factor models. International Journal of Finance & Economics, 31(2), 2208–2228. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijfe.70038
[3] Găman, Ş., Tak, R., & Jheng, S. L. (2026). ESG-aware asset selection and portfolio optimization: A comparative study of multi-criteria decision-making methods. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 20(1), 133–147. https://doi.org/10.2478/picbe-2026-0016
[4] Gong, Z., & Feng, J. (2025). A novel multifactor type-2 fuzzy time series model based on improved fuzzy C-means algorithm and justifiable granularity for stock index forecasting. Soft Computing, 29(7), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00500-025-10651-7
[5] Doukali, M., Kone, N., & Taamouti, A. (2026). A regularization approach to optimizing large portfolios under asymmetries in returns and risk attitudes. Econometric Reviews, 45(6), 826–855. https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2026.2621658
[6] Liu, Y., Zhou, H., & Li, X. (2025). An instrumented principal component analysis factor model for Chinese equity options returns. Accounting & Finance, 65(5), 4370–4390. https://doi.org/10.1111/acfi.70082
[7] Hafeez, A., Jagirani, S. T., & Hunt, K. A. (2025). How stock prices behave in response to institutional development: A four-factor asset pricing model. The World Economy, 48(4), 847–861. https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.13676
[8] Rysz, M. (2026). Network portfolio optimization with dynamic lower bounds on asset weights. European Journal of Operational Research, 335(1), 216–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2026.02.020
[9] Ansgar, S. (2024). Are minimum variance portfolios in multi-factor models long in low-beta assets? Mathematics and Financial Economics, 18(1), 151–170. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11579-024-00366-y
[10] Jin, X. (2024). Extreme risk connectedness in China's stock market: Fresh insights from time-varying general dynamic factor models. Computational Economics, 66(3), 1–33. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-024-10779-y
[11] Kim, I. S. (2024). Unveiling mispricing risks: Nonlarge homogeneous portfolio factor copula models for enhanced valuation of subordinated loan securitization. Journal of Futures Markets, 44(10), 1710–1732. https://doi.org/10.1002/fut.22535
[12] Fletcher, J. (2024). An examination of linear factor models in U.K. stock returns in the presence of dynamic trading. Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 63(3), 1121–1147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-024-01286-0
[13] Yao, H., Xia, S., & Liu, H. (2024). Return predictability via an long short-term memory-based cross-section factor model: Evidence from Chinese stock market. Journal of Forecasting, 43(6), 1770–1794. https://doi.org/10.1002/for.3096
[14] Dang, M. D., & Chen, C. (2026). Multiperiod mean-buffered probability of exceedance in defined contribution portfolio optimization. SIAM Journal on Financial Mathematics, 17(3), 1220–1278. https://doi.org/10.1137/25M1764773
[15] Chen, T., Y, Q., & L, X. (2023). Application of DeepForest-CQP multi-factor model in quantitative stock selection. Journal of Intelligent & Fuzzy Systems, 44(3), 5425–5436. https://doi.org/10.3233/jifs-222328
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Scientific Journal of Economics and Management Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




