Study of Behavioral Characteristics and Differences in Effectiveness of AIGC Use by College Students
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/43tjb798Keywords:
College Students, AIGC, Behavioral Characteristics, Differences in Effects.Abstract
With the deep integration of AIGC into higher education, this study focuses on the differences in AIGC usage behaviors and effects among college students in the scenarios of course learning, scientific research, daily social life, and work tasks, and analyzes the influence of individual characteristics, aiming to provide a reference for the rational application of AIGC. Based on 1,900 valid questionnaires, the study reveals how the application of AIGC promotes the ability of college students in different scenarios; using K-means clustering, students are categorized into four groups, namely, academic-assisted, research-creation and deliberation, enjoyable-experiential, and shrewd and competent, to analyze the effect of the use of AIGC on different groups. It is found that AIGC helps to improve learning, innovation, socialization and working ability; the characteristics of gender, grade and major significantly affect the usage effect; and there are significant differences in the paths of AIGC usage effect among the four groups. It is suggested that students should correctly use AIGC to meet their own needs; the technical team should provide personalized services to help students make reasonable use of the tool to improve their own abilities; colleges and universities should strengthen the guidance and standardization of the application of AIGC, and set up educational scenarios to support the development of students.
Downloads
References
[1] WANG Siyao,HUANG Yating. Facilitating or inhibiting: the impact of generative artificial intelligence on college students' creativity[J]. China Higher Education Research,2024,(11):29-36.
[2] SUN Dan,ZHU Chengcong,XU Zuodong,et al. Research on the analysis of college students' programming learning behavior based on generative artificial intelligence[J]. Research on E-Chemical Education,2024,45(03):113-120.
[3] TANG Qianwen,YIN Zihan,ZHANG Hao. Objectives and implementation strategies of digital literacy cultivation for college students in the context of generative artificial intelligence[J/OL]. Library Work and Research,1-12[2025-04-14].
[4] He Shanyun,Shen Yan. Learning to ask questions: a study of collaborative learning model between college students and generative artificial intelligence[J]. Journal of East China Normal University (Education Science Edition),2025,43(02):34-48.
[5] ZHU Junhua,XU Luyao,MA Jinyuan. How Generative Artificial Intelligence Empowers Student Learning - An Empirical Study Based on College Students' Self-Regulated Learning Behavior[J]. Research on Higher Engineering Education,2025,(02):66-72.
[6] Wang Yabing,Xuan Qianying,Zhang Jun Lawrence.A study on the effect of generative artificial intelligence intervention on college students' feedback input in foreign language writing[J]. Chinese Foreign Language,2025,22(02):71-78.
[7] ZHOU Hongyu,CHANG Shunshun. The future picture of generative artificial intelligence embedded in higher education, potential risks and its governance[J]. Modern Education Management,2023, (11):1-12.
[8] LI Zhe,CHEN Zhiyong. Cyberparenting in higher education:How generative artificial intelligence can empower[J]. Education Academic Monthly,2024,(11):95-102.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Scientific Journal of Intelligent Systems Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.