Current Status and Trends of Blockchain Consensus Mechanisms

Authors

  • Yujie Yang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/9wtrd766

Keywords:

Blockchain, consensus mechanisms, distributed systems, consistency.

Abstract

Since the introduction of Bitcoin in 2008, the blockchain technology as its underlying architecture, has attracted attention from various sides due to its decentralized and distributed computing characteristics. AS the core advantage of blockchain technology, the consensus mechanism determines various characteristics of blockchain, such as security, scalability, and decentralization. Currently, there are many consensus mechanisms suitable for different scenarios. This paper studies the existing consensus mechanisms from the perspectives of algorithm principles, performance, etc. Firstly, this article divides the existing consensus mechanisms into Proof of Work (PoW), Proof of Stake (PoS), and Byzantine Fault Tolerance (BFT). Secondly, for each type of consensus mechanisms, the study analyzes their algorithmic principles, understands typical solutions and latest ones, clarifies the advantages, disadvantages, and the possible attack methods of various consensus mechanisms. Finally, the paper defines the basic requirements for new consensus mechanisms. It aims to help break through the application bottlenecks of blockchain technology and promote the development of blockchain technology in various scenarios.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Nakamoto S. Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system[J]. Available at SSRN 3440802, 2008.

[2] Junk C. Pricing via Processing[C]//Advances in Cryptology-CRYPTO’92: 12th Annual International Cryptology Conference, Santa Barbara, California, USA, August 16–20, 1992. Proceedings. Springer, 2003, 740: 139.

[3] Sompolinsky Y, Zohar A. Secure high-rate transaction processing in bitcoin[C]//International conference on financial cryptography and data security. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2015: 507-527.

[4] Eyal I, Gencer A E, Sirer E G, et al. {Bitcoin-NG}: A scalable blockchain protocol[C]//13th USENIX symposium on networked systems design and implementation (NSDI 16). 2016: 45-59.

[5] Tan Minsheng, Xu Guoqing, Ding Lin, etc Improvement of Blockchain Consensus Mechanism Based on POW [J]. Computer Applications and Software, 2024, 41 (11): 117-122

[6] Quantum Mechanic. Proof of stake[EB/OL].(2011-07-11)[2018-09-30].https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=27787

[7] Schuh F, Larimer D. Bitshares 2.0: Financial smart contract platform[J]. Bitshares Financ. Platf, 2015, 12.

[8] Bentov, Iddo, et al. "Proof of activity: Extending bitcoin's proof of work via proof of stake [extended abstract] y." ACM SIGMETRICS Performance Evaluation Review 42.3 (2014): 34-37.

[9] Liu Mingxi, Gan Guohua, Cheng Yukun, etc The Development Status and Prospects of Blockchain Consensus Mechanisms [J]. Journal of Operations Research, 2020, 24 (1): 23-39

[10] Wang Xinsheng, Jiang Liwei, Xiong Shuming Improved DPOS consensus mechanism based on Shapley value [J]. Computer Applications and Software, 2025, 42 (1): 234-240

[11] Castro M, Liskov B. Practical byzantine fault tolerance[C]//OsDI. 1999, 99(1999): 173-186.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-29

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Yang, Yujie. 2025. “Current Status and Trends of Blockchain Consensus Mechanisms”. Scientific Journal of Intelligent Systems Research 7 (10): 9-16. https://doi.org/10.54691/9wtrd766.