Gendered Patterns of Generative AI Adoption among University Students: A Cross-Cultural Survey of Chinese and International Users

Authors

  • Jiong Li King’s College London University College London, "Department of Culture, Media & Creative Industries, Institute of Education, UCL", London, United Kingdom

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/5gc3yb96

Keywords:

Gender, generative AI, media practice, cultural context, cross-cultural communication, university students.

Abstract

The fast spread of generative artificial intelligence has already become pervasive in university students' media practices, but there is still an inadequate understanding of the gender and culturally embedded factors underlying its adoption process. This paper examines the effect of gender and cultural background in isolation and combination on the frequency, diversity, and types of generative AI adoption by university students in China using a cross-cultural online survey of 412 respondents, including both Chinese students and students of other countries. As shown, statistically significant gender differences occur on all three dimensions – male respondents have more frequent AI use and greater use diversity, with a notable inclination toward AI coding help and entertainment purposes, whereas women are mainly engaged in AI academic writing and language translation. From a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), gender and cultural background interact to produce a significant small effect size (=.011), where the gender difference among international students is larger than that of Chinese students (mean difference=0.61 vs. 0.26). Regression analysis also supports the significance of both predictors with a negative interaction coefficient (β=-.15, p=.038), which implies that Chinese cultural orientation reduces gender differences. In all, the results provide a broader understanding of gender digital divide by shifting the discussion from the access stage to the usage stage, indicating that AI technology's institutionalization and the features of the domestic platform ecosystem might partly explain the gender divide in China.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Contractor, Z., & Reyes, G. (2025). Generative AI in higher education: Evidence from an elite college. IZA Discussion Paper, No. 18055.

[2] Freeman, J. (2025). Student Generative AI Survey 2025 (HEPI Policy Note 61). Higher Education Policy Institute.

[3] Otis, N. G., Delecourt, S., Cranney, K., & Koning, R. (2024). Global evidence on gender gaps and generative AI. Harvard Business School Working Paper, No. 25-023.

[4] Zhao, Y., Yuan, Y., Wen, Z., Leng, L., Shi, L., Hu, X., Wei, X., Zuo, M., Mou, J., Luo, Q., Chen, M., Hu, R., & Gao, H. (2025). The current status, knowledge, attitudes, and challenges of generative AI use among undergraduate nursing students. Frontiers in Public Health, 13, 1648416.

[5] Wang, S. J. (2026). A comparative analysis of generative AI adoption among design professionals in China and the United Kingdom. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 13, Article 411.

[6] Peláez-Sánchez, I. C., Velarde-Camaqui, D., & Ramos-de-Luna, I. (2023). Gender digital divide in education 4.0. Future in Educational Research, 1(1), 12–28.

[7] Yu, S., Carroll, F., & Bentley, B. L. (2026). Rethinking AI literacy education in higher education. Social Sciences & Humanities Open, 13, 102751.

[8] Horvát, E.-Á., & González-Bailón, S. (2024). Quantifying gender disparities and bias online. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 29(1), zmad054.

[9] Hofstede, G. (2011). Dimensionalizing cultures: The Hofstede model in context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 8.

[10] Jan, J., Alshare, K. A., & Lane, P. L. (2024). Hofstede's cultural dimensions in technology acceptance models: A meta-analysis. Universal Access in the Information Society, 23, 717–741.

[11] Cao, K. (2026). A cross-cultural study on the adoption intention of generative AI among international students in China. Frontiers in Education, 11, 1833616.

[12] Simões, R. B., Amaral, I., Flores, A. M. M., & Antunes, E. (2023). Scripted gender practices: Young adults' social media app uses in Portugal. Social Media + Society, 9(3).

[13] Cao, K., Wang, P., & Zhao, J. (2025). The moderating role of ethnic culture on adoption intention of generative AI among university students. Frontiers in Education, 10, 1622620.

[14] Gonzales, S. (2024, August 6). AI literacy and the new digital divide: A global call for action. UNESCO Global AI Ethics and Governance Observatory. https://www.unesco.org/ethics-ai/en/articles/ai-literacy-and-new-digital-divide-global-call-action

Downloads

Published

2026-06-23

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Li, Jiong. 2026. “Gendered Patterns of Generative AI Adoption Among University Students: A Cross-Cultural Survey of Chinese and International Users”. Scientific Journal of Intelligent Systems Research 8 (5): 57-67. https://doi.org/10.54691/5gc3yb96.