Intelligent Target Recognition Technology Empowers the Improvement of Urban Public Safety Governance Capabilities
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/wacj4538Keywords:
Intelligent Target Recognition; Urban Public Safety; Public Safety Governance.Abstract
The governance of urban public safety faces the dilemma of complex risks and insufficient effectiveness of traditional methods. Intelligent target recognition technology provides core support for solving this problem. This paper analyzes the multi-dimensional mechanism that this technology enables urban public security governance, and points out that it relies on convolutional neural network (CNN), transformer architecture and edge computing to build three mechanisms, namely, real-time accurate perception, active risk early warning, and cross sectoral collaborative decision-making, to promote the transformation of governance mode from passive response to active prevention and control. At the same time, this article reveals the four constraints faced by technology in practical implementation, including technological robustness, data privacy, institutional ethics, and organizational capacity. Based on this, we propose countermeasures and suggestions to promote model optimization and multimodal integration, improve regulatory standards and ethical review, strengthen data sharing and business process reengineering, and look forward to future research directions such as continuous learning, explainable AI, and privacy computing, providing a systematic reference for improving the efficiency of urban security governance.
Downloads
References
[1] Shahraki, A. A. (2026). Smart cities for all? Assessing the equity-sustainability nexus in Chengdu's digital governance. Journal of Urban Management, 15(3), 1195–1207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jum.2026.01.003
[2] Xin, S. (2026). The efficiency logic and co-governance reconstruction of artificial intelligence empowering social governance. Innovative Applications of AI, 3(2), 88–93. https://doi.org/10.70695/iaai202602a4
[3] Shen, J., & Zhan, J. (2026). Application, controversy and governance of artificial intelligence facial recognition in public security. Frontiers in Computing and Intelligent Systems, 16(1), 173–177. https://doi.org/10.54097/2e2mkf95
[4] Qin, G., & Yu, Y. (2022). Goal recognition method using intelligent analysis of basketball images under 6G Internet of Things technology. International Journal of Grid and Utility Computing, 13(2–3), 138–145. https://doi.org/10.1504/ijguc.2022.124385
[5] Mohammed, I., Ihab, H., Rani, M. E., et al. (2026). A framework for integrating participatory science into digital urban governance in developing contexts. International Journal of E-Planning Research (IJEPR), 15(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.4018/ijepr.410590
[6] Xu, B. (2026). Governance in the digital age: Grassroots initiatives and urban commercial vitality. Journal of Global Economy, Business and Finance, 8(2), 55–60. https://doi.org/10.53469/jgebf.2026.08(02).06
[7] Henry, L., & Ciulli, F. (2026). Tensions in data-sharing governance for circular cities: The case of the digital product passport. California Management Review, 68(2), 15–35. https://doi.org/10.1177/00081256251380360
[8] Kougias, C., & Papadakaki, M. (2026). Rethinking the ‘smart city’: From technology-led visions to citizen-centered governance—barriers and pathways in digital urban initiatives. Journal of Urban Affairs, 48(5), 1581–1604. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2025.2502116
[9] Hao, Z., & Chuanyuan, P. (2022). The impact of public health emergency governance based on artificial intelligence. Journal of Intelligent Systems, 31(1), 891–901. https://doi.org/10.1515/jisys-2022-0065
[10] Islam, S. A. F. (2025). Artificial Intelligence-powered carbon market intelligence and blockchain-enabled governance for climate-responsive urban infrastructure in the Global South. Journal of Engineering Research and Reports, 27(7), 440–472. https://doi.org/10.9734/jerr/2025/v27i71585
[11] Gong, H., Liu, H., & Cao, Y. (2026). Digital governance and urban total factor productivity: Evidence from China’s pilot policy. Digital Policy Regulation and Governance, 28(2), 206–224. https://doi.org/10.1108/dprg-06-2025-0171
[12] Ni, M., & Gong, Q. (2025). From early warning to resilience: Adaptive governance of urban public security systems under peak passenger flow-a case study of Harbin's ice and snow tourism. Journal of Applied Economics and Policy Studies, 18(11), 120–126. https://doi.org/10.54254/2977-5701/2025.31015
[13] Abdulhaleem, A. (2025). Public policy and security governance in Jordan: An assessment of national structures and reforms. Central European Journal of Public Policy, 19(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.2478/cejpp-2025-0011
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Scientific Journal of Intelligent Systems Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




