Detection Methods for Depressive Disorders based on Resting-State EEG Signals

Haoshu Zhang; Ping Yang

doi:10.54691/818j3848

Authors

Haoshu Zhang School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Beijing Union University, Beijing, China
Ping Yang School of Electronic and Information Engineering, Beijing Union University, Beijing, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/818j3848

Keywords:

Resting-state EEG; Major Depressive Disorder; Functional Connectivity; Deep Learning; Transformer; Graph Neural Network; Computer-aided Diagnosis.

Abstract

Major depressive disorder (MDD) is primarily diagnosed through structured interviews, symptom-rating scales, and clinical judgment, whereas objective neurophysiological biomarkers have not yet been standardized for routine practice. Resting-state electroencephalography (rs-EEG) is noninvasive, relatively inexpensive, has high temporal resolution, and is suitable for repeated recordings. It has therefore become an important platform at the intersection of electronic information engineering and psychiatry. This review synthesizes representative studies of multicenter validation, functional brain networks, adaptive signal decomposition, convolutional neural networks, recurrent and spiking neural networks, Transformers, graph neural networks, and graph-convolutional Transformer architectures to analyze the complete technical chain of rs-EEG-based depression detection. The review first examines eyes-open and eyes-closed paradigms, sampling and referencing, filtering and artifact rejection, empirical mode decomposition (EMD) and variational mode decomposition (VMD), spectral and nonlinear complexity measures, functional connectivity, and graph-theoretic indices. It then compares support vector machines, random forests, convolutional neural networks, long short-term memory networks, spiking neural networks, self-attention, graph convolutional networks, and hybrid architectures. Representative findings are interpreted according to subject-independent partitioning, independent test sets, cross-site heterogeneity, data-leakage risk, and the comparability of evaluation metrics. Available evidence indicates that interchannel connectivity may reflect the network-level abnormalities of MDD more robustly than isolated channel power. The integration of graph-based spatial modeling with global temporal modeling is methodologically well motivated, but high accuracy in a small cohort should not be interpreted as clinical generalizability. Current work remains constrained by limited sample sizes, inconsistent diagnostic labels, distribution shifts across devices and sites, sensitivity to graph construction, insufficient interpretability, privacy barriers to data sharing, and the difficulty of lightweight deployment. Future studies should prioritize self-supervised pretraining, dynamic brain graphs, cross-domain and federated learning, uncertainty calibration, low-channel wearable systems, prospective clinical validation, and interpretable neurophysiological biomarkers. These directions are essential for moving rs-EEG-assisted diagnosis from algorithmic demonstrations toward reproducible, explainable, and deployable clinical decision-support tools.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Cai, H., Han, J., Chen, Y., et al. (2018). A pervasive approach to EEG based depression detection. Complexity, 2018, Article 5238028. https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/5238028

[2] Čukić, M., López, V., & Pavón, J. (2020). Classification of depression through resting state electroencephalogram as a novel practice in psychiatry: Review. Journal of Medical Internet Research, 22(11), Article e19548. https://doi.org/10.2196/19548

[3] Greco, C., Matarazzo, O., Cordasco, G., et al. (2021). Discriminative power of EEG based biomarkers in major depressive disorder: A systematic review. IEEE Access, 9, 112850–112870. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2021.3103047

[4] Wu, C. T., Huang, H. C., Huang, S., et al. (2021). Resting state EEG signal for major depressive disorder detection: A systematic validation on a large and diverse dataset. Biosensors, 11(12), Article 499. https://doi.org/10.3390/bios11120499

[5] Zhang, B., Yan, G., Yang, Z., Su, Y., Wang, J., & Lei, T. (2021). Brain functional networks based on resting state EEG data for major depressive disorder analysis and classification. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 29, 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2020.3043426

[6] Shao, X., Sun, S., Li, J., Kong, W., Zhu, J., Li, X., & Hu, B. (2021). Analysis of functional brain network in MDD based on improved empirical mode decomposition with resting state EEG data. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 29, 1546–1556. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2021.3092140

[7] Li, M., Liu, Y., Liu, Y., et al. (2022). Resting state EEG based convolutional neural network for the diagnosis of depression and its severity. Frontiers in Physiology, 13, Article 956254. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphys.2022.956254

[8] Sam, A., Boostani, R., Hashempour, S., Taghavi, M., & Sanei, S. (2023). Depression identification using EEG signals via a hybrid of LSTM and spiking neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 31, 4725–4737. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2023.3336467

[9] Wang, Y., Peng, Y., Han, M., et al. (2024). GCTNet: A graph convolutional transformer network for major depressive disorder detection based on EEG signals. Journal of Neural Engineering, 21(3), Article 036042. https://doi.org/10.1088/1741 2552/ad5048

[10] Bullmore, E., & Sporns, O. (2009). Complex brain networks: Graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 10(3), 186–198. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn2575

[11] Stam, C. J. (2014). Modern network science of neurological disorders. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15(10), 683–695. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3801

[12] Akar, S. A., Kara, S., Agambayev, S., & Bilgiç, V. (2015). Nonlinear analysis of EEGs of patients with major depression during different emotional states. Computers in Biology and Medicine, 67, 49–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compbiomed.2015.09.019

[13] Wang, Z., Hu, C., Liu, W., Zhou, X., & Zhao, X. (2024). EEG based high performance depression state recognition. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 17, Article 1301214. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2023.1301214

[14] Song, Y., & Zhang, B. (2026). Depression recognition based on improved variational mode decomposition of electroencephalogram signals. Journal of Biomedical Engineering, 43(1), 45–52, 60. [In Chinese.]

[15] Delorme, A., & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: An open source toolbox for analysis of single trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134(1), 9–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009

[16] Oostenveld, R., Fries, P., Maris, E., & Schoffelen, J. M. (2011). FieldTrip: Open source software for advanced analysis of MEG, EEG, and invasive electrophysiological data. Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2011, Article 156869. https://doi.org/10.1155/2011/156869

[17] Huang, N. E., Shen, Z., Long, S. R., et al. (1998). The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and non stationary time series analysis. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 454(1971), 903–995. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.1998.0193

[18] Dragomiretskiy, K., & Zosso, D. (2014). Variational mode decomposition. IEEE Transactions on Signal Processing, 62(3), 531–544. https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2013.2288675

[19] Hosseinifard, B., Moradi, M. H., & Rostami, R. (2013). Classifying depression patients and normal subjects using machine learning techniques and nonlinear features from EEG signal. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 109(3), 339–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2012.10.008

[20] Ahmadlou, M., Adeli, H., & Adeli, A. (2012). Fractality analysis of frontal brain in major depressive disorder. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 85(2), 206–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2012.05.001

[21] Mahato, S., & Paul, S. (2019). Detection of major depressive disorder using linear and non linear features from EEG signals. Microsystem Technologies, 25(3), 1065–1076. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00542 018 4075 z

[22] Lachaux, J. P., Rodriguez, E., Martinerie, J., & Varela, F. J. (1999). Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals. Human Brain Mapping, 8(4), 194–208. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1097 0193(1999)8:4<194::AID HBM4>3.0.CO;2 C

[23] Stam, C. J., Nolte, G., & Daffertshofer, A. (2007). Phase lag index: Assessment of functional connectivity from multi channel EEG and MEG with diminished bias from common sources. Human Brain Mapping, 28(11), 1178–1193. https://doi.org/10.1002/hbm.20346

[24] Vinck, M., Oostenveld, R., van Wingerden, M., Battaglia, F., & Pennartz, C. M. A. (2011). An improved index of phase synchronization for electrophysiological data in the presence of volume conduction, noise and sample size bias. NeuroImage, 55(4), 1548–1565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2011.01.055

[25] Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998). Collective dynamics of ‘small world’ networks. Nature, 393(6684), 440–442. https://doi.org/10.1038/30918

[26] Mumtaz, W., Xia, L., Ali, S. S. A., et al. (2017). Electroencephalogram (EEG) based computer aided technique to diagnose major depressive disorder (MDD). Biomedical Signal Processing and Control, 31, 108–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bspc.2016.07.006

[27] Wan, Z., Zhang, H., Huang, J., Zhou, H., Yang, J., & Zhong, N. (2019). Single channel EEG based machine learning method for prescreening major depressive disorder. International Journal of Information Technology & Decision Making, 18(5), 1579–1603. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219622019500342

[28] Acharya, U. R., Oh, S. L., Hagiwara, Y., et al. (2018). Automated EEG based screening of depression using deep convolutional neural network. Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine, 161, 103–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cmpb.2018.04.012

[29] Uyulan, C., Ergüzel, T. T., Unubol, H., et al. (2021). Major depressive disorder classification based on different convolutional neural network models: Deep learning approach. Clinical EEG and Neuroscience, 52(1), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/1550059420916634

[30] Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735–1780. https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735

[31] Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., et al. (2017). Attention is all you need. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Vol. 30, pp. 5998–6008).

[32] Song, Y., Zheng, Q., Liu, B., & Gao, X. (2023). EEG Conformer: Convolutional transformer for EEG decoding and visualization. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 31, 710–719. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2022.3230250

[33] Jiang, C., Li, Y., Tang, Y., & Guan, C. (2021). Enhancing EEG based classification of depression patients using spatial information. IEEE Transactions on Neural Systems and Rehabilitation Engineering, 29, 566–575. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNSRE.2021.3059429

[34] Kipf, T. N., & Welling, M. (2017). Semi supervised classification with graph convolutional networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations.

[35] Veličković, P., Cucurull, G., Casanova, A., et al. (2018). Graph attention networks. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Learning Representations.

[36] Hamilton, W. L., Ying, R., & Leskovec, J. (2017). Inductive representation learning on large graphs. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (Vol. 30, pp. 1024–1034).

[37] Wu, Z., Pan, S., Chen, F., Long, G., Zhang, C., & Yu, P. S. (2021). A comprehensive survey on graph neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks and Learning Systems, 32(1), 4–24. https://doi.org/10.1109/TNNLS.2020.2978386

[38] Zhou, J., Cui, G., Hu, S., et al. (2020). Graph neural networks: A review of methods and applications. AI Open, 1, 57–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aiopen.2021.01.001

[39] Bronstein, M. M., Bruna, J., LeCun, Y., Szlam, A., & Vandergheynst, P. (2017). Geometric deep learning: Going beyond Euclidean data. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 34(4), 18–42. https://doi.org/10.1109/MSP.2017.2693418

[40] He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016). Deep residual learning for image recognition. In Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (pp. 770–778). https://doi.org/10.1109/CVPR.2016.90