Explaining the Widening Gender Ideological Gap in Recent Years: The Roles of Pandemic, Social Media, and Generative AI

Authors

  • Mengyao Dong Hangzhou HGW High School-International Track, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/qg6e5g95

Keywords:

Gender ideological polarization, gender political divide, algorithmic polarization, information cocoons, generative AI bias.

Abstract

This article examines the widening ideological gap between men and women through three contemporary factors: the COVID-19 pandemic, social media, and generative artificial intelligence. It argues that gendered experiences of economic insecurity, identity-based online communities, algorithmic filtering, and AI-related stereotypes and employment risks have pushed men and women toward increasingly divergent political positions. Together, these developments reinforce gender-based polarization and deepen the contemporary ideological divide.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Ayanian, A. H., Uluğ, Ö. M., Radke, H. R. M., & Zick, A. (2024). The social psychological predictors of men’s backlash responses to the #MeToo movement. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 27(7), 1680–1711. https://doi.org/10.1177/13684302231210492

[2] Davies, H. C. (2018). Redefining filter bubbles as (escapable) socio technical recursion. Sociological Research Online, 23(3), 637–654. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780418763824

[3] Friedman, E. J., & Rodríguez Gustá, A. L. (2023). “Welcome to the revolution”: Promoting generational renewal in Argentina’s Ni Una Menos. Qualitative Sociology, 46(2), 245–277. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11133 023 09530 0

[4] Gmyrek, P., Berg, J., Kamiński, K., Konopczyński, F., Ładna, A., Nafradi, B., Rosłaniec, K., & Troszyński, M. (2025). Generative AI and jobs: A refined global index of occupational exposure (ILO Working Paper No. 140). International Labour Organization. https://doi.org/10.54394/HETP0387

[5] Hogg, M. A. (2021). Self uncertainty and group identification: Consequences for social identity, group behavior, intergroup relations, and society. In B. Gawronski (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 64, pp. 263–316). Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2021.04.004

[6] International Labour Organization. (2021, July 19). Fewer women than men will regain employment during the COVID 19 recovery, says ILO. https://www.ilo.org/resource/news/fewer women men will regain employment during covid 19 recovery says ilo

[7] Kamarck, E., & Muchnick, J. (2024, May 23). The growing gender gap among young people. Brookings Institution. https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the growing gender gap among young people/

[8] Leary, M. R., & Batchelder, A. (2023). Sex differences in attitudes toward homosexual persons, behaviors, and civil rights. In L. A. Rudman & P. Glick (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of gender and social psychology (pp. 210–213). Oxford University Press.

[9] Lee, S. Y. T., Park, M., & Shin, Y. (2021). Hit harder, recover slower? Unequal employment effects of the COVID 19 shock (NBER Working Paper No. 28354). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://doi.org/10.3386/w28354

[10] Pariser, E. (2011). The filter bubble: What the Internet is hiding from you. Penguin Press.

[11] Pew Research Center. (2024, December 12). Teens, social media and technology 2024. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2024/12/12/teens social media and technology 2024/

[12] Pew Research Center. (2025). U.S. workers are more worried than hopeful about future AI use in the workplace. https://www.pewresearch.org

[13] Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster.

[14] Rieger, M. O., & Wang, M. (2022). Trust in government actions during the COVID 19 crisis. Social Indicators Research, 159, 967–989. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205 021 02772 x

[15] Sidanius, J., & Pratto, F. (1999). Social dominance: An intergroup theory of social hierarchy and oppression. Cambridge University Press.

[16] Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In W. G. Austin & S. Worchel (Eds.), The social psychology of intergroup relations (pp. 33–47). Brooks/Cole.

[17] The White House. (2025a, July). America’s AI action plan. https://www.whitehouse.gov/wp content/uploads/2025/07/Americas AI Action Plan.pdf

[18] The White House. (2025b, July 23). Preventing woke AI in the federal government. https://www.whitehouse.gov/presidential actions/2025/07/preventing woke ai in the federal government/

[19] Vandello, J. A., & Bosson, J. K. (2013). Hard won and easily lost: A review and synthesis of theory and research on precarious manhood. Psychology of Men & Masculinity, 14(2), 101–113. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029826

[20] Weinmann, H., Messingschlager, T. V., & Appel, M. (2026). Gender bias in text to image generative artificial intelligence: Neglect and stereotypical presentations across three popular platforms. New Media & Society. Advance online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448261435197

Downloads

Published

2026-10-30

Issue

Section

Articles