Construction of a Deep Learning-Driven Reliability Assessment Model for Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities

Authors

  • Kai Liu Depart of Radiation Medicine and Environmental Medicine, China Institute for Radiation Protection, Taiyuan, China
  • Juan Kang Depart of Radiation Medicine and Environmental Medicine, China Institute for Radiation Protection, Taiyuan, China
  • Kaijie Zhao Depart of Radiation Medicine and Environmental Medicine, China Institute for Radiation Protection, Taiyuan, China
  • Xiaoming Liu Depart of Radiation Medicine and Environmental Medicine, China Institute for Radiation Protection, Taiyuan, China
  • Huaipu Zhao Depart of Radiation Medicine and Environmental Medicine, China Institute for Radiation Protection, Taiyuan, China
  • Xiaona Kong Depart of Radiation Medicine and Environmental Medicine, China Institute for Radiation Protection, Taiyuan, China
  • Yanfeng Qu Depart of Radiation Medicine and Environmental Medicine, China Institute for Radiation Protection, Taiyuan, China
  • Yao Wu Depart of Radiation Medicine and Environmental Medicine, China Institute for Radiation Protection, Taiyuan, China
  • Yanzhe Mao Depart of Radiation Medicine and Environmental Medicine, China Institute for Radiation Protection, Taiyuan, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/hbz7wy92

Keywords:

Deep learning, nuclear fuel cycle facility, reliability assessment, dynamic attention map convolutional neural network (DAGCN), multi-source heterogeneous data fusion, experimental simulation.

Abstract

Reliability assessment of nuclear fuel cycle facilities is crucial for the safe operation of nuclear energy. However, traditional methods suffer from drawbacks such as difficulty in fusing multi-source heterogeneous data, insufficient capture of equipment topology correlations, and inadequate learning of dynamic failure features. To address these issues, this paper proposes a Dynamic Attention Graph Convolutional Neural Network (DAGCN) for facility reliability assessment. The model constructs a three-layer collaborative module: a multi-source data preprocessing module that uses sliding window Z-score normalization to eliminate dimensions and combines multimodal attention to highlight core indicators; a dynamic attention graph convolutional module that constructs a condition-dependent equipment topology graph to accurately locate key failure nodes and capture associated failure features; and a temporal coding module that learns the progressive evolution of operating conditions through bidirectional LSTM. Experiments are conducted using real data (100,000 data points) from a nuclear power plant from 2019 to 2023 and Monte Carlo simulation extreme data (20,000 data points), comparing six types of traditional, machine learning, and deep learning models. The results show that DAGCN achieves an accuracy of 98.2% and a recall of 97.8%, representing improvements of 3.5 and 4.2 percentage points respectively compared to the optimal baseline model GAT. The MAE is 1.23 and RMSE is 1.56, representing reductions of 22.1% and 19.3% compared to GAT. Even under extreme operating conditions, the accuracy remains above 95.8%, demonstrating significantly better stability than other models. This research provides technical support for the intelligent upgrading of reliability assessment for nuclear fuel cycle facilities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Peng, M., Feng, W., Cao, Q., Hu, Y., Chen, Y., & Wang, D. (2022). Research progress on the application of Raman spectroscopy in nuclear fuel analysis. The Journal of Light Scattering, 34, 85–94.

[2] Jiao, Y., Yu, J., Zhou, Y., Li, Y., Chen, P., & Duan, Z. (2022). Research and development progress and application prospects of commercial pressurized water reactor nuclear fuel. Nuclear Power Engineering, 43, 1–7.

[3] Dong, Y., Lü, J., & Li, Q. (2024). Analysis of the influence of particle agglomeration behavior on the failure of dispersed nuclear fuel cores. Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 58, 868–877.

[4] Fang, Q., Lu, Y., Hou, C., & Dai, Z. (2025). Seismic design requirements for equipment in my country's civil nuclear fuel cycle facilities and their comparison with relevant international standards. Earthquake Disaster Prevention Technology, 20, 362–371.

[5] Zhang, Y., Zhao, X., Zhang, Y., Yang, Y., Lü, W., Liu, X., ... & Ge, C. (2025). Research progress on the antioxidant mechanism and performance enhancement of accident-resistant nuclear fuel UN. Journal of Engineering Science, 47, 682–696.

[6] Wang, H., & Hanzhou, R. (2025). Study on bolt seizure of nuclear fuel transport container under bias load. Engineering Research and Application, 3, 7–9.

[7] Sheng, H., He, J., Gou, J., Shan, J., & Liu, G. (2024). Improvement of radiolysis gas model for critical accident analysis of nuclear fuel solution system. Nuclear Power Engineering, 45, 160–165.

[8] An, J., Chen, B., Xie, Z., Zhang, X., Bi, Y., & Lu, L. (2024). Research on key technologies for the development of resistance welding equipment for nuclear fuel rods. Electric Welding Machine, 54, 44–49.

[9] Liu, X., He, L., Wu, M., Wei, G., Li, Z., Li, Y., ... & Chen, D. (2021). Research on experimental method of indirect neutron CT for nuclear fuel elements based on neutron IP plate. Atomic Energy Science and Technology, 55, 939–944.

[10] Wang, F., Xie, D., Zhang, A., Kang, R., Wu, L., & Pan, H. (2021). Comparative study on static and dynamic force analysis during nuclear fuel fission and fragmentation. Journal of Chongqing University of Technology (Natural Science), 35, 100–105.

[11] Liu, T. (2021). Research on particle size characterization method of graphite powder for nuclear fuel elements of high-temperature gas-cooled reactor. Nuclear Science and Engineering, 41, 689–694.

Downloads

Published

2026-10-29

Issue

Section

Articles