Anomaly Diagnosis Method for Electric Vehicle Charging Equipment based on Semantic and Probabilistic Reasoning
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/m0yy8d51Keywords:
Electric vehicle charging equipment, anomaly diagnosis, semantic reasoning, Bayesian network, wavelet packet transform, multi-source data fusion.Abstract
Against the backdrop of the large-scale advancement of new energy vehicle charging networks, anomalies such as charging failures and slow charging have become increasingly prevalent. Conventional diagnostic methodologies are constrained by a single information dimension, fragmented textual data, and inadequate intelligence. To address these challenges, this study proposes an anomaly diagnosis method for electric vehicle charging equipment based on semantic and probabilistic reasoning. The method integrates user review texts, equipment operation monitoring data, and wave recording data, excavates implicit fault clues via semantic models, extracts feature variables through the combination of wavelet packet transform and distance correlation analysis, and constructs a hierarchical Bayesian reasoning model encompassing "charging state-feature variable-fault cause" to achieve precise identification of abnormal states and root cause localization. Validation through practical operation and maintenance cases demonstrates that the proposed method effectively fuses multi-source heterogeneous data, achieving a diagnostic accuracy of over 91% for typical charging anomalies. It significantly enhances the reliability and practicality of charging anomaly diagnosis in complex scenarios, thereby providing robust technical support for the intelligent operation and maintenance of charging equipment.
Downloads
References
[1] Xu, X., Gao, X., Li, G., et al. (2022). Analysis on charging safety fault characteristics of electric vehicle charging facilities based on data mining. Electrical & Energy Management Technology, (3), 15–22.
[2] Zhou, J., Gao, T., Wang, Q., et al. (2025). Fault diagnosis of charging piles based on GA-LSTM neural network. Modern Electronics Technique, 48(16), 97–104.
[3] Fu, Z., Zhang, J., Luo, W., et al. (2024). Joint fault diagnosis of battery state of charge and voltage/temperature anomalies. Science Technology and Engineering, 24(8), 3260–3268.
[4] Xiong, R., Yu, Q. Q., Shen, W. X., et al. (2019). A sensor fault diagnosis method for a lithium-ion battery pack in electric vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Power Electronics, 34(10), 9709–9718.
[5] Gómez, P. I., Moreno, A. B., Lin, J., et al. (2022). Data-driven thermal modelling for anomaly detection in electric vehicle charging stations. In The 2022 IEEE Transportation Electrification Conference & Expo (ITEC) (pp. 1005–1010). IEEE.
[6] Peng, H., Wen, Y., Wang, L., et al. (2019). Differentiated operation and maintenance technology for power equipment based on a two-layer knowledge architecture. High Voltage Apparatus, 55(7), 221–226. https://doi.org/10.13296/j.1001-1609.
[7] Guo, W., Yin, X., Wang, J., et al. (2018). Design of long-distance operation and maintenance system of charging pile based on Manhattan distance method. Power System Protection and Control, 46(13), 134–140.
[8] Khalid, M., Ahmad, F., Panigrahi, B. K., et al. (2022). A comprehensive review on advanced charging topologies and methodologies for electric vehicle battery. Journal of Energy Storage, 53, 105084.
[9] Lamonaca, S., & Ryan, L. (2022). The state of play in electric vehicle charging services: A review of infrastructure provision, players, and policies. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 154, 111733.
[10] Gao, D. X., Wang, Y., Zheng, X. Y., et al. (2021). A fault warning method for electric vehicle charging process based on adaptive deep belief network. World Electric Vehicle Journal, 12(4), 265.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Scientific Journal of Intelligent Systems Research

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




