The Potential of MCII to Enhance English Listening Skills Among College Students: A Feasibility Analysis

Fang Yuan

doi:10.54691/w6rvwk58

Authors

Fang Yuan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/w6rvwk58

Keywords:

Mental Contrasting with Implementation Intentions; English Listening Skills; Feasibility Analysis.

Abstract

This study examines the feasibility of using Mental Contrasting with Implementation Intentions (MCII) to enhance English listening comprehension among college students. MCII, a self-regulation strategy, combines contrasting desired outcomes with present obstacles, followed by forming "if-then" action plans to overcome them. One hundred students were randomly assigned to MCII, Implementation Intentions (II), and a control group. Over eight weeks, the MCII group received mental contrasting and implementation intentions training, while the II group focused only on implementation intentions. Pretest and posttest assessments of listening skills and self-regulation were conducted. The expected results suggest that the MCII group will show the most remarkable improvement in listening comprehension, highlighting the potential of MCII as a cost-effective intervention to enhance listening skills through improved self-regulation. This has practical implications for language education by offering an efficient way to improve learning outcomes.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Azevedo, R. (2005). Using hypermedia as a metacognitive tool for enhancing student learning? The role of self-regulated learning. Educational Psychologist, 40(4), 199-209. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep4004_2

[2] Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C., & Leu, D. J. (Eds.). (2014). Handbook of research on new literacies. New York, NY: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410618894

[3] Duckworth, A. L., Grant, H., Loew, B., Oettingen, G., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2011). Self-regulation strategies improve self-discipline in adolescents: Benefits of mental contrasting and implementation intentions. Educational Psychology, 31(1), 17-26. https://doi.org/10.1080/01443410.2010.506003

[4] Duckworth, A. L., Kirby, T. A., Gollwitzer, A., & Oettingen, G. (2013). From fantasy to action: Mental contrasting with implementation intentions (MCII) improves academic performance in children. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 4(6), 745-753. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550613476307

[5] Goldie, J. G. S. (2016). Connectivism: A knowledge learning theory for the digital age? Medical Teacher, 38(10), 1064-1069. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2016.1173661

[6] Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: A meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69-119. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(06)38002-1

[7] Greene, J. A., Yu, S., & Copeland, D. Z. (2014). Measuring critical components of digital literacy and their relationships with learning. Computers & Education, 76, 55-69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2014.03.008

[8] Hoch, E., Scheiter, K., & Schüler, A. (2020). Implementation intentions related to self-regulatory processes do not enhance learning in a multimedia environment. Frontiers in Psychology, 11:46. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00046

[9] Oettingen, G., Kappes, H. B., Guttenberg, K. B., & Gollwitzer, P. M. (2015). Self-regulation of time management: Mental contrasting with implementation intentions. European Journal of Social Psychology, 45(2), 218-229.https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2090

[10] Oettingen, G. & Gollwitzer, P.M. (2015). Self-regulation: Principles and tools. In G. Oettingen & P.M. Gollwitzer (Eds.), Self-Regulation in adolescents (pp. 3-29). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.