Critical Discourse Analysis of Chinese English News Reports from the Perspective of Ecolinguistics

-- Taking the Reports of the Northward Migration of Asian Elephants as an Example

Authors

  • Min Song

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpssh.v14i.214

Keywords:

Critical Discourse Analysis; English News Reports; Ecolinguistics.

Abstract

This study makes a Critical Discourse Analysis of the ecological and non-ecological features of Chinese English news reports and holds that news reports ultimately serves the interest groups it represents and cannot get rid of its ideological influence. To achieve this, with Fairclough’s three-dimensional model as the theoretical framework and from the perspective of ecolinguistics, this study, based on 29 English news reports on the northward migration of Asian elephants from China Daily and by building up a small corpus, combining qualitative and quantitative research methods, aims to analyze the selected corpus with the help of AntConc 3.5.9 (windows) 2020. Finally, through the analysis of text analysis, discourse interpretation, and social interpretation, it is found that Chinese and English news reports have ecological and non-ecological features. At the same time, English news reports in China also try to express and build a harmonious relationship between man and nature. It reflects that China follows the ecological order concept of “harmonious co-existence between man and nature” and the ecological basis of “man and nature are the community of life”.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anthony, L. (2020). AntConc (Version 3.5.9) [Computer Software]. Tokyo, Japan: Waseda University. Available from https://www.laurenceanthony.net/software.

Arran Stibbe. (2015). Ecolinguistics:Language, ecology and the stories we live by. London:Routledge.

Chen, X., Yan, Y., & Hu, J. (2019). A corpus-based study of Hillary Clinton’s and Donald Trump’s linguistic styles. International Journal of English Linguistics, 9(3), 13-22.

Darren Kelsey, Frank Mueller, Andrea Whittle & Majid KhosraviNik. (2016). Financial crisis and austerity: interdisciplinary concerns in critical discourse studies. Critical Discourse Studies, (1), 1-20.

Ding Jianxin & Qin Yong. (2013). A Social-Cognitive Critical Discourse Analysis of Depoliticalization and Emergent Structure in Newspaper Report on Hurricane Sandy. Foreign Language Research, (02), 8-13.

Ding, J. & Liao, Y. (2001). Review on the Critical Discourse Analysis. Contemporary Linguistics, 4, 305-310.

Dong Youneng & Wang Jingjing. (2012). English Journalism and Critical Discourse Analysis. Journal of Hubei University (Philosophy and Social Science Edition), 39(02), 133-136.

Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and Power. New York, US: Longman.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Critical Discourse Analysis: The critical study of language, (Vol. 81). New York, US: Longman.

Fu Xiao-qiu & Shen Hong. (2014). A Comparative Critical Discourse Analysis of the Reports of South China Morning Post and Fox News on the “Snowden Event”. Shandong Foreign Language Teaching Journal, (04), 47-53.

Hu Yu-meng & Wei Lu. (2019). Representation and Transformation of Media Discourse of AIDS: A Discourse Analysis Based on the AIDS Reports in People’s Daily. Journal of Lanzhou University (Social Science Edition), (03), 106-116.

Huang Guowen & Arran Stibbe. (2018). A Review of Arran Stibbe’s Ecolinguistic Studies. Journal of Poyang Lake, (01), 48-53+126.

Huang Guowen & Chen Yang. (2016). Ecosophy and Ecological Analysis of Discourse. Foreign Language and Literature, (06), 55-61.

Huang Guowen & Chen Yang. (2017). Ecolinguistics as a New Discipline. Foreign Languages in China, (05), 38-46.

Huang Guowen. (2016). The Birth and the Development of Ecolinguistics. Foreign Languages in China, (01), 1+9-12.

Li Xiao-fei & Kan Ming-gang. (2019). Study on the English Online Buzzwords from the Perspective of Eco-linguistics. Journal of North China University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition), (02), 123-127.

M.Justin Davis & T. Nathaniel French.(2008). Blaming Victims and Survivors: An Analysis of Post-Katrina Print News Coverage. Southern Communication Journal, (3), 243-257.

Mao Meimei. (2020). A Study of Weibo Language from the Perspective of Ecolinguistics. Master thesis: Yunnan Normal University.

Pan Yanyan. (2015). The Image of China Navy Built by the American Media: A Critical Discourse Analysis of the News Reports on China’s Navy from the Website “StrategyPage” from 2013 to 2014. Foreign Language Research, (02), 7-12.

Shan Shengjiang. (2011). Critical Discourse Analysis of News Discourse. Foreign Language Research, (06), 78-81.

Van Dijk T A. (1977). Text and context: explorations in the semantics and pragmatics of discourse. London and New York: Longmans. pp. xvii+261.

Wang Chunyan. (2009). Applications of AntConc in Foreign Language Teaching and Research. Computer-assisted Foreign Language Education in China, (01), 45-48+78.

Wei Zhong-sheng.(2014). Understanding and Translating of English News Report -- Study Based on Critical Discourse Analysis of News Report on South China Sea Conflict. Journal of Chongqing University of Technology (Social Science Edition), (12), 127-133.

Xin Bin. (2008). Intertextual Analysis in Discourse Studies. Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, (01), 6-10.

Yu Hangyan, Lu Huiling & Hu Jie. (2021). A Corpus-Based Critical Discourse Analysis of News Reports on the COVID-19 Pandemic in China and the UK. International Journal of English Linguistics, (2), 36-45.

Yuan Lingqing. (2019). Critical Discourse Analysis of Economic News Discourses --Take the Economist as an example. Overseas English, (05), 225-226.

Zhang Tengfei. (2020). A Study of Senior High School English Teachers’ Classroom Discourse from the Perspective of Ecolinguistics. Master thesis: Liaoning Normal University.

Downloads

Published

2021-12-17

How to Cite

Song, M. (2021). Critical Discourse Analysis of Chinese English News Reports from the Perspective of Ecolinguistics : -- Taking the Reports of the Northward Migration of Asian Elephants as an Example. BCP Social Sciences & Humanities, 14, 238-247. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpssh.v14i.214