Critical Discourse Analysis of China in G7 Joint Communique: A Proximization Theory Perspective

Yifan Wang

doi:10.54691/bcpssh.v22i.5241

Authors

Yifan Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpssh.v22i.5241

Keywords:

G7 Joint Communique; Discourse Construction; Proximization Theory; Legitimation.

Abstract

Political discourse contains deep ideological implications and it has become more crucial in the current context to analyze political discourse to reveal political ideologies. In recent years, proximization theory has emerged as a new approach to critical discourse analysis. Based on Proximization theory, this study explores the ideological messages conveyed by three US presidents regarding China in the G7 joint communique. By analyzing the joint communique issued during the terms of Obama, Trump, and Biden, this study reveals a significant shift in the US government’s positioning towards China: from a "partner" during the Obama era to a "competitor" during the Trump and Biden eras. The critical discourse analysis based on Proximization theory reveals the evolution of the US government's attitudes towards China and exposes the ideological factors behind it.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Cap, P. (2014). Applying cognitive pragmatics to critical discourse studies: A proximization analysis of three public space discourses. Journal of Pragmatics, (70): 16-30.

Cap, P. (2010). Axiological Aspects of Proximization. Journal of Pragmatics, (42) 392-407.

Cap, P. (2013). Proximization. The pragmatics of Symbolic Distance Crossing. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company.

Cap, P. (2008). Towards the proximization of the analysis of legitimization in political discourse. Journal of Pragmatics, 40, 17-41.

Chilton, P. (2004) Analysing Political Discourse: Theory and Practice. London: Routledge.

Fairclough, N. (1995). Media Discourse. London: Edward Arnold.

Halliday, M. A. K. (1994). An Introduction to Functional Grammar (2ed.). London: Edward Arnold.

Tian, H. (2002). Political Language Studies: A Critical Survey. Foreign Language Education. (1), 23-29.

Yan, B., & Zhang, H. (2018). A Critical Cognitive Analysis of China-US Trade War Discourses-from the Perspective of Proximization Theory. Foreign Languages Research. (06):16-22.

Liao, G., & Wu, M. (2019). Deconstructing the Chinese lmage Conveyed by Trump Administration Based on the Proximization Theory. Journal of Huaibei Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences). (03):74-79.

Wu, J., & Niu, F. (2018) An analysis of the Legalization of political discourse from the perspective of proximization theory -- A case study of Trump's immigration policy. Foreign Languages in China. (06):48-53.

Wang, S., & Zhao, X. (2022). A Wmatrix-assisted Proximization Study: A Case of CSIS's Discourse on China's Energy. Discourse Studies Forum. (01):53-73.

Wodak & M. Meyer. (2001). Methods of Critical discourse analysis. London: Sage Publications.

Yao, Z., (2021). Discursive construction of community in combating COVID-19 from the perspective of Proximization Theory. Foreign Studies. (03):42-48.

Liao, G., & Wu, M. (2019). Deconstructing the Chinese image Conveyed by Trump Administration Based on the Proximization Theory. Journal of Huaibei Normal University (Philosophy and Social Sciences). (03):74-79.