The Legal Construction of Family Justice

Authors

  • Yongmei Xia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpssh.v22i.5346

Keywords:

Family Justice; Family Law; Social Law; Human Rights Law.

Abstract

In traditional society, family justice is mainly confirmed through ethics, which emphasizes "friendship" and "obedience" among family members. In modern society, family justice is more concerned with the basic rights of individual family members and opposes the unreasonable distribution of obligations, so family justice needs to be realized through law. The pursuit of family justice is not only the purpose of human beings, but also the purpose of law. The realization of family justice requires not only the regulation and guidance of family law, but also the support of social law and human rights law.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Yan Cunsheng, Theses on Social Justice and Legal Justice, Academic Research, 2018 (08), pp.59-65.

Yan Cunsheng, The value of law as human value: a rethinking of the concept of 'value of law', Journal of Wuhan University of Science and Technology (Social Science Edition), 2018, 20 (04), pp.374-386.

John Eekelaar, Not of the Highest Importance: Family Justice under threat, Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law, vol. 33, 2011, pp. 311-352. 311-352.

Barbara Ann Atwood, Marital Contracts and the Meaning of Marriage, Arizona Law Review, Vol. 54, No. 11, 2012, p. 11.

Stephanie Coontz, Marriage, a history: How Love Conquered Marriage, Penguin Books, 2006, pp.362-366.

Amartya Sen, Development as Freedom, Ren Zhao & Yu Zhen, Renmin University of China Press, 2013, p. 285.

Chen Yingfang, The State and the Family, the Individual: The Family System in Urban China (1949-1979), in: Ji Weidong (Eds.), Jiaotong University Law, Vol. I, Shanghai Jiao Tong University Press, 2010.

Wu Fei, Suicide and Justice, Renmin University of China Press, 2009, pp. 260-261.

Downloads

Published

2023-08-02

How to Cite

Xia, Y. (2023). The Legal Construction of Family Justice. BCP Social Sciences & Humanities, 22, 101-104. https://doi.org/10.54691/bcpssh.v22i.5346