Research on Low-carbon Service Outsourcing Supply Chain with Overconfidence of Manufacturers under Carbon Trading Regulation

Hongjuan Wang

doi:10.6981/FEM.202501_6(1).0014

Authors

Hongjuan Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6981/FEM.202501_6(1).0014

Keywords:

Carbon Trading; Overconfidence; Low Carbon Service Outsourcing.

Abstract

This paper considers the influence of manufacturers' overconfidence behavior on the members of low-carbon service outsourcing supply chain and the whole supply chain under the regulation of carbon trading, and constructs a Stackelberg game model dominated by low-carbon service providers. Then, through comparative analysis and numerical analysis, the following conclusions are drawn: the manufacturer's overconfidence will lead to the manufacturer's profit and the overall profit of the supply chain being lower than that of the manufacturer and the overall profit of the supply chain under complete rationality. On the contrary, when the manufacturer is overconfident, the profit of low-carbon service providers is higher than that when the manufacturer is completely rational.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Information on:https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2020-09/22/content_5546168.htm.

[2] Information on: http://he.people.com.cn/BIG5/n2/2022/0623/c201421-40008546.html.

[3] Zhao Dan, Jian Shoufeng: Optimal emission reduction investment strategy of supply chain under multiple carbon policies, Industrial Engineering and Management, Vol. 23 (2018) No.4,p.53-61.

[4] Zhou Yanju, Wu Jiepeng, Chen Xiaohong, et al. Research on the design of embedded low-carbon service mechanism under low-carbon economy, System Engineering Theory and Practice, Vol. 36 (2016) No.5,p.1193-1204.

[5] Wu Jiepeng, Zhou Yanju, Zhou Xiongwei: Research on embedded low-carbon service mechanism based on energy-saving service, System Engineering Theory and Practice, Vol. 38 (2018) No.10,p.2512-2525.

[6] Qian D,Guo J:Research on the energy-saving and revenue sharing strategy of ESCOs under the uncertainty of the value of Energy Performance Contracting Projects,Energy Policy, Vol. 73 (2014),p.710-721.

[7] Ding H,Huang H,Tang O: Sustainable supply chain collaboration with outsourcing pollutant-reduction service in power industry, Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 186 (2018),p. 215-228.

[8] Wang Q ,He L :Managing Risk Aversion for Low-Carbon Supply Chains with Emission Abatement Outsourcing,International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health,Vol. 15 (2018) No.2, p.367-367.

[9] Xianjin D ,Huimin Z ,Xiaoxuan Z , et al:The upstream innovation with an overconfident manufacturer in a supply chain,Omega, Vol. 105 (2021).

[10] Zhongyuan H ,Juan L ,Jinling C:Allocation of inventory responsibilities in overconfident supply chains,European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 305 (2023) No.1,p.207-221.

[11] Kirshner N S ,Shao L :The overconfident and optimistic price-setting newsvendor,European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 227 (2019) No.1,p.166-173.

[12] Liu J ,Zhou H ,Wan M , et al:How Does Overconfidence Affect Decision Making of the Green Product Manufacturer, Mathematical Problems in Engineering, Vol. 2019 (2019) No.2019,p.1-14.