The Impact of Entrepreneurial Spiritual Capital on Green Innovation
The Role of Resource Concordance and Institutional Pressure
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6981/FEM.202503_6(3).0016Keywords:
Green Innovation; Resource Concordance; Institutional Pressure.Abstract
Based on theories such as resource concordance, this paper adopts a combination of theoretical exposition and empirical testing to explore how entrepreneurial spiritual capital exerts influence on corporate green innovation through the mediating variable of resource concordance. And on this basis, three institutional pressures, namely normative pressure, regulatory pressure and imitative pressure, are introduced as moderating variables to observe the influence of institutional pressure, an external factor, on the mechanism of spiritual leadership's effect on corporate green innovation. This study adopts the way of questionnaire survey, with manufacturing enterprises as the research sample, this questionnaire was issued 550 copies, 483 copies of questionnaires were recovered, after eliminating the questionnaires with strong regularity and incomplete filling, the final number of valid samples obtained was 416, and the samples collected through the questionnaire survey were examined by using the software of Amos24.0 and SPSS27.0 (with Process4.1 plug-in). The samples collected through the questionnaire survey were analyzed by using Amos24.0, SPSS27.0 (with Process4.1 plug-in) software to conduct common method bias test, reliability and validity test, descriptive statistical analysis, correlation analysis, and regression analysis. Through empirical research, this study presents the following results: (1) entrepreneurial spiritual capital has a significant positive effect on resource concertation and green innovation; (2) resource concertation plays a partially mediating role between entrepreneurial spiritual capital and green innovation; (3) regulatory pressure plays a positive moderating role between entrepreneurial spiritual capital and resource concertation; (4) regulatory pressure plays a positive moderating role between entrepreneurial spiritual capital and resource concertation; (5) regulatory pressure plays a positive moderating role between entrepreneurial spiritual capital and resource concertation. play a positive moderating role between entrepreneurial spiritual capital and resource concertina; (5) imitative pressure plays a positive moderating role between entrepreneurial spiritual capital and resource concertina.
Downloads
References
[1] Chen Y S, Lai S B, Wen C T. The influence of green innovation performance on corporate advantage in Taiwan[J]. Journal of business ethics, 2006, 67: 331-339.
[2] SUN Bing, CONG Guiyu, TIAN Shengnan. Research on the mechanism of environmental regulation's influence on enterprises' green innovation--the dual moderating role of strategic flexibility and regional differentiation[J]. Science and Technology Progress and Countermeasures,2022,39(09): 94-102.
[3] RUI Z Y, LU Y R. Stakeholder pressure,corporate environmental ethics and green innovation[J]. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 2021,29(1):70-86.
[4] QU You, GUAN Zhimin, YE Tong. Research on dynamic optimization and coordination of collaborative green innovation in supply chain based on CVaR criterion[J]. Industrial Engineering and Management,2018,23(04):62-72+80.
[5] X. Wang, Y. Wang. Research on green credit policy to enhance green innovation[J]. Management World,2021,37(06): 173-188+11.
[6] Mrkajic B, Murtinu S, Scalera V G. Is green the new gold? Venture capital and green entrepreneurship[J]. Small Business Economics, 2019, 52(4): 929-950.
[7] LIU Zhuankuo,WANG Hongyan. The impact of executives' military experience on corporate green innovation[J]. Soft Science,2021,35(12):74-80.
[8] Xie Xuemei, Zhu Qiwei. How to Solve the Problem of “Harmonious Symbiosis” in the Practice of Green Innovation in Enterprises[J]. Management World, 2021,37(1):128-149,9.
[9] Baker C, Miles-Watson J. Faith and Traditional Capitals: Defining the Public Scope of Spiritual and Religious Capital—A Literature Review. Implicit Relig, 2010, 13(1): 17-69.
[10] Zahra S A, Nielsen A P. Sources of capabilities, integration and technology commercialization. Strateg Manag J, 2002, 23(5): 377-398.
[11] Crossan M, Mazutis D, Seijts G. In search of virtue: The role of virtues, values and character strengths in ethical decision making[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2013, 113: 567-581.
[12] Ji, Xiangxi, Ming Huang, and Yuanxu Li. 2022. “Executive Strategic Focus, Resource Concordance and Firm Performance”. Research on Financial Issues, Issue 3, 122-29.
[13] Andersén,J. ,Ljungkvist,T. Resource Orchestration for Team-Based Innovation: A Case Study of the Interplay Between Teams,Customers,and Top Management[J]. R&D Management,2021,51( 1) : 147-160.
[14] Carton A M, Murphy C, Clark J R. A (blurry) vision of the future: How leader rhetoric about ultimate goals influences performance[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2014, 57(6): 1544-1570.
[15] Gu, J.P. and Zhang, S.Y.. 2016. A Study on the Impact of Executive Spiritual Capital on Employee Creativity in High-Tech Enterprises. Science and Science and Technology Management 37 (4): 172-80.
[16] JI Xiangxi,HUANG Ming. Digitalization level and enterprise value--an empirical study based on the perspective of resource concordance[J]. Modern Economic Discussion,2022,(04):105-113.
[17] Zahra, Shaker A., Anders P. Nielsen. 2002. “Sources of Capabilities, Integration and Technology Commercialization”. Strategic Management Journal 23 (5): 377–98.
[18] Helfat C E, Peteraf M A. Understanding dynamic capabilities: progress along a developmental path. Strateg Organ, 2009, 7(1): 91-102.
[19] Crossan M, Mazutis D, Seijts G. In search of virtue: The role of virtues, values and character strengths in ethical decision making[J]. Journal of Business Ethics, 2013, 113: 567-581.
[20] XU Jianzhong,GUAN Jun,LIN Yan. Institutional Pressure, Executive Environmental Awareness and Corporate Green Innovation Practices-Based on New Institutionalism Theory and Higher-Order Theory Perspectives[J]. Management Review,2017,29(09):72-83.
[21] Zhu Q, Geng Y. Drivers and barriers of extended supply chain practices for energy saving and emission reduction among Chinese manufacturers[J]. Journal of cleaner production, 2013, 40: 6-12.
[22] Zhu Q, Sarkis J, Lai K hung. Institutional-based antecedents and performance outcomes of internal and external green supply chain management practices[J]. Purch Supply Manag, 2013, 19(2): 106-117.
[23] Baker C, Miles-Watson J. Faith and Traditional Capitals: Defining the Public Scope of Spiritual and Religious Capital-A Literature Review. Implicit Relig, 2010, 13(1): 17-69.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Frontiers in Economics and Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.



