Strategies for the Synergistic Development of the Cultural Industry and Tourism Economy from the Perspective of Cultural-Tourism Integration

Lina Gao

doi:10.6981/FEM.202504_6(4).0019

Authors

Lina Gao

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.6981/FEM.202504_6(4).0019

Keywords:

Cultural-tourism Integration; Cultural Industry; Tourism Economy.

Abstract

Amid the ongoing transformation of the economy and society, traditional development models of the cultural industry and tourism economy have become increasingly inadequate to meet the evolving requirements of modern economic development. To better align both the cultural industry and tourism economy with the diversified trends of modernization, greater attention must be given to their coordinated development. There is a natural synergy between the two: the cultural industry is the soul of the tourism economy, while tourism provides a vehicle for the dissemination of culture. Their organic integration offers mutual benefits, contributing to improved living standards for the public and meeting the needs of social development. Therefore, this paper deeply explores strategies for the synergistic development of the cultural industry and tourism economy under the framework of cultural-tourism integration, aiming to further advance their deep integration and achieve mutual benefit and common development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Castanho, R.A.; Santos, C.; Couto, G. Creative Tourism in Islands and Regional Sustainable Development: What Can We Learn from the Pilot Projects Implemented in the Azores Territory? Land 2023, 12, 498.

[2] Sun, C.; Tong, Y.; Zou, W. The evolution and a temporal-spatial difference analysis of green development in China. Sustain. Cities Soc. 2018, 41, 52–61.

[3] Dong, F.; Li, Y.; Zhang, X.; Zhu, J.; Zheng, L. How does industrial convergence affect the energy efficiency of manufacturing in newly industrialized countries? Fresh evidence from China. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 316, 128316.

[4] Pan, S.Y.; Gao, M.; Kim, H.; Shah, K.J.; Pei, S.L.; Chiang, P.C. Advances and challenges in sustainable tourism toward a green economy. Sci. Total Environ. 2018, 635, 452–469.

[5] Wang, M.X.; Zhao, H.H.; Cui, J.X.; Fan, D.; Lv, B.; Wang, G.; Li, Z.H.; Zhou, G.J. Evaluating green development level of nine cities within the Pearl River Delta, China. J. Clean. Prod. 2018, 174, 315–323.

[6] Xiao, Y.; Chen, J.; Wang, X.; Lu, X. Regional green development level and its spatial spillover effects: Empirical evidence from Hubei Province, China. Ecol. Indic. 2022, 143, 109312.

[7] Richards, G.; Wilson, J. Developing creativity in tourist experiences: A solution to the serial reproduction of culture? Tour. Manag. 2006, 27, 1209–1223.

[8] Sick, N.; Preschitschek, N.; Leker, J.; Bröring, S. A new framework to assess industry convergence in high technology environments. Technovation 2019, 84–85, 48–58.

[9] Hu, M.; Li, Z.; Hou, B. The Influencing Effect of Tourism Economy on Green Development Efficiency in the Yangtze River Delta. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 1072.

[10] Boccella, N.; Salerno, I. Creative Economy, Cultural Industries and Local Development. Procedia-Soc. Behav. Sci. 2016, 223, 291–296.

[11] Han, M.S.; Yuan, Q.; Fahad, S.; Ma, T. Dynamic evaluation of green development level of ASEAN region and its spatio-temporal patterns. J. Clean. Prod. 2022, 362, 132402.

[12] Sokół, A.; Pangsy-Kania, S.; Biegańska, J. Do cultural industries have an impact on sustainable development in EU countries? J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 428, 139400.

[13] Chirakranont, R.; Sakdiyakorn, M. Conceptualizing meaningful tourism experiences: Case study of a small craft beer brewery in Thailand. J. Destin. Mark. Manag. 2022, 23, 100691.

[14] Huang, C.E.; Liu, C.H. The creative experience and its impact on brand image and travel benefits: The moderating role of culture learning. Tour. Manag. Perspect. 2018, 28, 144–155.

[15] Huang, H.; Mo, R.; Chen, X. New patterns in China’s regional green development: An interval Malmquist–Luenberger productivity analysis. Struct. Chang. Econ. Dyn. 2021, 58, 161–173.