Analysis of the Differentiated Concentration Strategy of Xunda Group
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.6981/FEM.202504_6(4).0027Keywords:
Differentiated Concentration Strategy; Competitive Strategy; Strategic Implementation.Abstract
In the context of the transformation of China's kitchen appliance industry from an incremental market to a stock market, the competitive landscape of the industry has undergone profound changes. Alongside the increase in residents' income levels, the upgrading of consumption concepts, and the strengthening of health consciousness, the market demand for diversified and high-end kitchen appliances has been continuously escalating, and the industry has entered a crucial stage of transformation and upgrading. This study adopts Porter's competitive theory as the analytical framework and selects Xunda Technology Group Co., Ltd. as the case study to explore the strategic choices and implementation paths of small and medium-sized kitchen appliance enterprises in the stock competition environment. The research discovers that through a differentiated concentration strategy, Xunda Group has constructed competitive advantages in three dimensions: in-depth cultivation in regional markets, focus on core technologies, and professionalization in product research and development. Nevertheless, field research reveals issues such as solidified brand perception, imbalanced product sales structure, and lagging insight into consumer demands during the strategy implementation process. Based on this, this paper presents relevant improvement suggestions to provide practical references for similar kitchen appliance enterprises to cope with industry transformation challenges and achieve sustainable development.
Downloads
References
[1] Amoo N; Lodorfos G; Mahtab N: Over half a century of strategic planning performance research–what have we been missing?, International Journal of Organizational Analysis,Vol.31 (2023) No.5, p.1623-1652.
[2] Dwikat S Y; Arshad D; Mohd Shariff M N: The influence of systematic strategic planning and strategic business innovation on the sustainable performance of manufacturing SMEs: The case of Palestine, Sustainability, Vol.20 (2022) No.14, p.13388.
[3] Lee C H; Hoehn‐Weiss M N; Karim S: Competing both ways: How combining Porter's low‐cost and focus strategies hurts firm performance,Strategic Management Journal, Vol.42 (2021) No.12, p.2218-2244.
[4] Li Juan; Li Qin; Li Wenwu: Analysis of Enterprise Management Strategy Based on Differentiation Strategy, Academic Journal of Business & Management, Vol.4 (2022) No.3, p.55-58.
[5] Deepak Kaushal; Sanjeev Kumar; Rahul Raj; Abhishek Negi: Understanding the effect of entrepreneurial orientation, innovation capability and differentiation strategy on firm performance: a study on small and medium enterprises,International Journal of Business and Globalisation, Vol.30 (2022) No.1, p.57-80.
[6] Ameer Rashid; Othman Radiah: The Impact of Working Capital Management on Financial Performance of Cost Leadership and Differentiation Strategy Firms in Different Busi ness Cycles: Evidence from New Zealand, Journal of Asia-Pacific Business, Vol.22 (2021) No.1, p.39-57.
[7] Bradley J Olson; Wenlong Yuan; Yongjian Bao; Zhenyu Wu: Interpreting strategic issues: Effects of differentiation strategies and resource configurations on corporate entrepreneurship, The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, Vol.21 (2020) No.3, p.141-155.
[8] Tapish Panwar; Kalim Khan: Ingredient Branding: A Differentiation Strategy for the Commoditized World, Paradigm, Vol24 (2020) No.2, p.149-163.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Frontiers in Economics and Management

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.



