Research on Improving the Welfare of Peasant Households with Expropriated Land from the Perspective of Common Prosperity: -- A Case Study of Shexian County, Huangshan City

Xiaojing Wu

doi:10.54691/fhss.v2i8.1672

Authors

Xiaojing Wu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/fhss.v2i8.1672

Keywords:

Common Prosperity; Land Expropriation; Farmers Welfare.

Abstract

Common prosperity is an essential requirement of socialism and an important feature of Chinese modernization. The goal is to enable everyone to share in the fruits of economic and social development. At present, the problem of unbalanced and insufficient development in our country is still outstanding, and the task of common prosperity is still arduous. Among them, it is a necessary problem to let farmers who are expropriated land share the fruits of economic development and improve their welfare to realize common prosperity. A large number of rural collective land has been expropriated, which has played an important role in promoting the development of urbanization. Meanwhile, it has also brought about changes in the quality of life of farmers whose land has been expropriated. Common prosperity should not only improve their income, but also comprehensively improve the welfare level. Based on the theory of sen feasible ability, plans to build the landless farmers benefit evaluation index system, rapidly to the landless peasants for field survey, data collection, using the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method evaluating the landless farmers welfare changes direction and change level, further analyses the reason of peasant household welfare changes, improve pertinently the countermeasures of landless farmers welfare In order to further improve the compensation system for land expropriation, let land-lost farmers truly share the fruits of urbanization development, narrow the gap between urban and rural areas, and achieve common prosperity to provide reference.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Wang Jian, Zhang Zeyu. New Public Participation in the Boundary Discussion of Land Expropriation: Based on the analysis of typical land expropriation cases in Taiwan [J]. China land science, 2016, 30 (07): 14-21+32.

Li Yan. study on expropriation and compensation system of other rights of collective land [J]. China land science,2016,30(07):49-55.

Liu Linghui, Zheng Yaoqun. China population, resources and environment,2016,26(11):76-82.

Gao Jinyun, Qiao Rongfeng. Measurement of Farmers' Welfare Change and Cultivation of feasible ability before and after land expropriation: An empirical study based on survey data of four districts in Tianjin [J]. China population, resources and environment,2016,26(S2):158-161.

Chen Mei-qiu, LIAO Cai-rong, et al. Research on the Realization of the Membership Rights of Rural Collective Economic Organizations -- Based on the "Discussion on the Realization of the Membership Rights of Rural Collective Economic Organizations from the Perspective of Land Expropriation" [J]. China land science,2018,32(01):58-64.

XU Zhong, Xu Liang, et al. Compensation for land Acquisition, willingness to acquire land and capital input of farmers: A perspective of farmers who have not lost their land [J]. Journal of Rural Economy, 2018 (10):44-50.

Ding Guomin, Liu Guichang. Optimization of dispute settlement mechanism of compensation fee allocation for rural land expropriation [J]. Rural Economy,2020(05):1-9.

Liu Rui, Chen Xue. On the construction of emergency land expropriation system in China [J]. China land science,2020,34(06):28-34.

Cai Meina, Murtazashivili Jennifer Brick,etc. Sugarcoating the bitter pill: compensation, land governance, and opposition to land expropriation in China[J]. The Journal of Peasant Studies, 2020, 47 (6):

Cheng Xueyang. On the coordination between collective land expropriation and market value-added income distribution [J]. China land science,2020,34(10):28-33.

Shan A L, WU K N, et al. Performance evaluation of land expropriation system reform in dingzhou city based on effect model [J]. China agricultural resources and regional planning,2018,39(09):239-245.

Wang Yakun, Zhao Heng, et al. Research on Land Acquisition Procedure from the perspective of Farmers' Rights protection: A Case study of 5 construction projects in Hebei Province [J]. China agricultural resources and regional planning,2019,40(04):161-171.

GAO B. A masterpiece of promoting the reform of land expropriation system -- Comment on Dr Zhang Peng's "From Land Expropriation to Quasi-Land Expropriation: Principles and Policies" [J]. China land science,2019,33(05):103-104.

Lu S H, Yao Y T, et al. Farmers' Demands in land expropriation: A big data analysis based on "Local leaders' Message Board" [J]. Issues in Agricultural Economy,2020(07):58-68.

Wu Yue, Song Yu, et al. Balance of public and private interests and due process in land expropriation [J]. Rural Economy,2020(08):28-36.

Hu Dawei. A Study on the relationship between land expropriation and collective commercial Construction Land [J]. China land science,2020,34(09):10-16+23.

Lin Yao Tang. Discussion on legislation of expropriation and compensation of farmers' housing [J]. Rural Economy,2021(04):40-47. (in Chinese)

[TANG J. From economic policy to social policy: An explanation of the change of land expropriation system. China land science,2021,35(05):1-7.

Feng Lei, Sun Dan, et al. Farmer participation, procedural fairness and satisfaction with land expropriation: An empirical analysis based on the "1,000 people and 100 Villages" survey in 2019 [J]. China land science,2021,35(03):29-39.

Ou Shengbin. Research on welfare effect of land expropriation from the perspective of household differentiation [D]. Nanjing Agricultural University,2018.

Li Mingfeng, Zhang Xin, Yang Chuan, Wu Yue. Research on the Livelihood Situation of rural households with land expropriated in suburban Areas during Urbanization process: A case study of Xinzhou District, Wuhan City [J]. Modern Urban Research,2021(09):117-123.

Feng Lei, Sun Dan, Yan Jinhai. Farmer participation, procedural fairness and satisfaction with land expropriation: An empirical analysis based on the "1,000 people and 100 Villages" survey in 2019 [J]. China land science,2021,35(03):29-39.

Su Huashan, Lu Wenhui, Huang Shanshan. Research on the efficiency of Income to Welfare Conversion of Chinese residents: Based on Sen's theory of feasible ability [J]. Contemporary Economic Research,2018(03):66-74.

Liu Xuan, Qu Xiaoli. An Empirical analysis of the New Generation of Migrant Workers' ability to integrate into cities based on the theory of feasible ability [J]. Adult education,2018,38(02):52-57.

Yang Tao, Shi Yanhong, Liu Jianhua. Analysis of rights and interests of land-lost immigrants based on feasible ability theory [J]. Rural Economy,2010(08):80-83.

Wang Keqiang. An Empirical study on the Effect of Land on Farmers' Basic Living Security: A Case study of Jiangsu Province [J]. Journal of Sichuan University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition), 2005 (03):5-11.

Ingrid Robeyns. Sen's Capability Approach and Render Inequality:Selecting Relevant Capabilities [J]. Feminist Economics,2003,9(2-3).

Cerioli,A .S .,Zani.A fuzzy approach to the measurement of poverty. Income and wealth distribution, inequality and poverty[J]. Berlin:Springer Verlag,1990.

Cheli,B. ,A. Lemmi. A“Totally”fuzzy and relative approach to the multidimensional analysis of poverty [J]. Economic Notes,1995,24( 1) :115-134.

Gao Jinyun, Qiao Rongfeng, Zhang Anlu. Fuzzy evaluation of Farmers' Welfare Changes before and after rural land urban Transfer: Based on Sen's feasible ability theory [J]. Management World, 2007 (06) : 45-55.

Miceli,D .Measuring poverty using fuzzy sets[J]. NATSEM: University of Canberr,1998.

Wang Wei, Ma Chao. Research on Welfare Level of Land-lost Farmers Based on Feasible Ability Theory: A Case study of Yixing and Taicang in Jiangsu Province [J]. Journal of Agricultural Technical Economics, 2013(06):20-31.

Yang Tao, Shi Yanhong, Liu Jianhua. Analysis of rights and interests of land-lost immigrants based on feasible ability theory [J]. Rural Economy,2010(08):80-83.