Study on the Role of Maternity Insurance in Protecting Families under the "Three-child" Policy

Authors

  • Yitai Zhu

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/fhss.v2i10.2427

Keywords:

Maternity Insurance; Maternity Benefits; Maternity Wishes.

Abstract

This paper analyzes the current situation of maternity insurance in the context of the three-child policy and finds that although the participation rate and coverage of maternity insurance have increased after the merger with employee medical insurance, there are still problems such as high pressure on the payment of maternity insurance fund, insufficient coverage of maternity insurance, inadequate maternity allowance system, and compensation standards that cannot meet actual needs. Therefore, in the context of China's current maternity situation and policies, this paper makes the following suggestions: to reduce the pressure of payment by expanding the number of potential participants such as the flexibly employed population, and to enrich the investment model of the fund to establish effective supervision of the "open source" method; to expand the time span of maternity insurance coverage, to include the preparation process of pregnancy in the scope of benefits, and to Extend the recovery period for the second trimester and raise the compensation standard; lower the threshold limit for receiving maternity allowance, and provide graded compensation according to the number of births of two and three children, while reformulating the maternity compensation standard according to the actual situation of the region. It is thus hoped that a complete protection system will be established to reduce the worries of maternity families in the process of pregnancy and childbirth and to fulfill the protection and uplifting functions of maternity insurance itself.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Z.W. Zhai, X.L. Zhang: Analysis of the demographic consequences of immediate and full liberalization of the two-child policy, Journal of Population Studies, Vol. 38 (2014), p. 3-17.

K. Miyazaki: Pay-as-you-go social security and endogenous fertility in a neoclassical growth model, Journal of Population Economics,Vol. 26 (2021), p. 4-12.

R. Fenge,B. Scheubel: Pensions and fertility: back to the roots-Bismarck’s Pension Scheme and the first demographic transition, Journal of Population Economics,Vol. 30(2019), p. 36-40.

M. Hirazawa,et al: Aging,fertility,social security and political equilibrium, Journal of Population Economics,Vol.23 (2010), p. 79-83.

E. Mörk, et al: Childcare costs and the demand for children-evidence from a nationwide reform, Journal of Population Economics, Vol. 26(2013), p.101-110 .

M. Brewer, et al: Does welfare reform affect fertility? Evidence from the UK, Journal of Population Economics, Vol. 25(2021), p. 36-40.

M. Neuart, H. Ohlsson: Economic incentives and the timing of births: evidence from the German parental benefit reform of 2007, Journal of Population Economics, Vol. 26(2013), p. 1-11.

R. RiphahnI, F. Wiynck: Fertility effects of child benefits, Journal of Population Economics, Vol. 30(2017), p. 9-15.

K. Cygan: Parental leave benefit and differential fertility responses: evidence from a German reform, Journal of Population Economics, Vol. 29(2021), p. 17-25.

E. Todd, et al: Evaluating the impact of conditional cash transfer programs on fertility: the case of the Red de Protección Social in Nicaragua, Journal of Population Economics, Vol. 25(2021), p. 2-8.

A. Nandi, R. Laxminarayan: The unintended effects of cash transfers on fertility: evidence from the Safe Motherhood Scheme in India, Journal of Population Economics, Vol. 29(2016), p. 9-13.

T. Palermo, et al: Unconditional government social cash transfer in Africa does not increase fertility, Journal of Population Economics, Vol. 29(2016), p. 96-110.

H. Arolas: A cohort perspective of the effect of unemployment on fertility, Journal of Population Economics, Vol. 30(2020), p. 261-270.

E. Bono, et al: Fertility and economic instability: the role of unemployment and job displacement, Journal of Population Economics, Vol. 28(2015), p. 79-90.

P. Sslmaliki, et al: The causal relationship between female labor supply and fertility in the USA: updated evidence via a time series multihorizon approach, Journal of Population Economics, Vol. 26(2020), p. 159-163.

G. Becker: An Economic Analysis of Fertility( Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1960).

R. Willis: A new approach to the economic theory of fertility behavior, Journal Political Economics, Vol. 81(1973), p. 13-25.

P. Esteau, G. Ponthiere: Optimal life-cycle fertility in a Barro-Becker economy, Journal of Population Economics, Vol. 28(2019), p. 257-262.

O. Galor, A. Mountfoed: Trading Population for Productivity: Theory and Evidence, Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 75(2008), p. 29-34.

U. Lehmijoki, T. Palokamgas: Trade,population growth,and the environment in developing countries, Journal of Population Economics, Vol. 23(2010), p. 300-310.

O. Galor, A. Mountford: Trade and the Great Divergence: The Family Connection, American Economic Review, Vol. 96(2006), p. 59-70.

R. Brock: Adieu Rabenmutter-culture,fertility,female labour supply,the gender wage gap and childcare, Journal of Population Economics, Vol. 27(2022), p. 93-101.

M. Bratti, K. Tatsiramos: The effect of delaying motherhood on the second childbirth in Europe, Journal of Population Economics, Vol. 25(2021), p. 11-21.

Y.M. Chin, N. Wilson: Disease risk and fertility: evidence from the HIV/AIDS pandemic, Journal of Population Economics, Vol. 31(2018), p. 39-42.

C. Jjuhn, et al: HIV and fertility in Africa: first evidence from population-based surveys, Journal of Population Economics, Vol. 26(2022), p. 191-205.

D. Durevall, A. Lindskog: Uncovering the impact of the HIV epidemic on fertility in Sub-Saharan Africa: the case of Malawi, Journal of Population Economics, Vol. 24(2011), p. 79-83.

A. Nandi, et al: The effect of natural disaster on fertility,birth spacing,and child sex ratio: evidence from a major earthquake in India, Journal of Population Economics, Vol. 31(2018), p. 179-183.

R.W. Eevans, et al: The fertility effect of catastrophe: U.S. hurricane births [J]. Journal of Population Economics, Vol. 23(2021), p. 264-270.

C.E. Öst: Housing and children: simultaneous decisions? A cohort study of young adults’ housing and family formation decision, Journal of Population Economics, Vol. 25(2012), p. 69-73.

M. Kahn, et al: Relational contracts for household formation,fertility choice and separation, Journal of Population Economics, Vol. 29(2016), p. 93-100.

M. Komura: Fertility and endogenous gender bargaining power, Journal of Population Economics, Vol. 26(2020), p. 31-40.

A. Yakita: Fertility and education decisions and child-care policy effects in a Nash-bargaining family model, Journal of Population Economics, Vol. 31(2018), p. 67-72.

M. Frenette: How does the stork delegate work? Childbearing and the gender division of paid and unpaid labour, Journal of Population Economics, Vol. 24(2011), p. 171-176.

V. Amin, J.R. Behrman: Do more-schooled women have fewer children and delay child-bearing? Evidence from a sample of US twins, Journal of Population Economics, Vol. 27(2014), p. 136-140.

Y. Hahn, et al: The effect of female education on marital matches and child health in Bangladesh, Journal of Population Economics, Vol.31 (2022), p. 201-206.

L. Zanin, et al: Modelling the impact of women’s education on fertility in Malawi, Journal of Population Economics, Vol. 28(2015), p. 135-139.

D. Rosenblum: The effect of fertility decisions on excess female mortality in India, Journal of Population Economics, Vol. 26(2019), p. 14-18.

K.N. Norberg, P. Pantano: Cesarean sections and subsequent fertility, Journal of Population Economics, Vol. 29(2016), p. 31-35.

P.E. Gobbi: A model of voluntary childlessness, Journal of Population Economics, Vol. 26(2020), p. 3-9.

Downloads

Published

2022-10-23

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Zhu, Y. (2022). Study on the Role of Maternity Insurance in Protecting Families under the "Three-child" Policy. Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences, 2(10), 141-149. https://doi.org/10.54691/fhss.v2i10.2427