The challenge and path of constructing China's patent indirect infringement system

Authors

  • Zhongsen Zhang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/qr9yjk47

Keywords:

Patent right, Indirect infringement, Inducing infringement, Fault, Legal clause.

Abstract

According to the "comprehensive coverage principle", the patent infringement should meet all the technical characteristics of the patent right to be established, but in practice, there is a situation, that is, to provide a patent component or implementation method of a patent step and provide assistance, or intentionally instil others to commit a specific infringement. If the perpetrator does not carry out the act controlled by the exclusive right of intellectual property, but helps or ABETS others to carry out the act controlled by the exclusive right of intellectual property, how to regulate the above behavior, there is a solution strategy of introducing the indirect infringement system of intellectual property in theory. The legitimate basis for the existence of indirect infringement system of intellectual property rights is to prevent intellectual property rights from being overhead and deep pocket rules. Based on the existing judicial interpretation, this paper summarizes the specific problems faced by indirect patent infringement in China through statistical analysis of relevant cases in practice, analyzes the rationality and feasibility of the construction of this system from the perspectives of jurisprudence and law and economics, and compares the relevant provisions of foreign countries. This paper provides suggestions and references for establishing indirect infringement clauses in the Patent Law in the future from the aspects of clarifying the nature and legislative mode of indirect infringement, the specific components of determining infringement, the liability of infringement and the causes of exemption.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Wu Handong. The trend of international legislation on indirect patent Infringement and the Choice of Chinese system [J]. Modern Law,2020(03):30-45

Zhang Q J. Reflection on the legislative model of indirect patent infringement in China [J]. Intellectual Property Rights,2017(04):35-41. (in Chinese)

(US)E. Bodenheimer. Jurisprudence: Legal Philosophy and Legal Method [M]. Translated by Deng Zhenglai. Beijing: China University of Political Science and Law Press,1999:219.

Ge Hongyi. Jurisprudence [M]. Beijing: China Renmin University Press,2011:148.

Zhu Xuezhong. Reflection and Reference on the defense of Implied license for Indirect Patent Infringement in the United States [J]. Legal Science,2018(02):179-190.

Wang Liming. Civil Law [M]. Shanghai: Fudan University Press,2005:811.

Wang Guozhu. The legislative structure of the indirect infringement system of Intellectual property rights in China [J]. Journal of Northeastern University (Social Science Edition),2015(03):295-299.

Wei Zhenying. Civil Law (Fourth Edition) [M]. Beijing: Higher Education Press,2010:645-648.

Cao Qian. Defects and Improvement of legislation on patent infringement in China: A case study of several special infringements.[J]. Modern Women: Frontiers in Theory,2013,10:57-58.

CAI Yuanzhen. Analysis on subjective elements of indirect patent infringement in the United States [J]. Intellectual Property Rights,2017(09):89-96.

Downloads

Published

2024-03-28

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Zhang, Z. (2024). The challenge and path of constructing China’s patent indirect infringement system. Frontiers in Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(3), 50-60. https://doi.org/10.54691/qr9yjk47