Psychological Analysis of Subjective Motion: A Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/1tx72v86Keywords:
Subjective motion, psychological analysis.Abstract
Over the last thirty years, much attention has been devoted to one specific issue – subjective motion. This article takes a retrospective look at the related studies on psychological analysis of subjective motion, which cover a wide variety of perspectives, including understanding tasks, drawing tasks, eye movement tasks, time and motion surveys, and neuroscience studies. These previous works can give important enlightenment to the field of motion studies.
Downloads
References
Boroditsky, L., & Ramscar, M. (2002). The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science, 13(2), 185-188.
Gibbs, R. Jr. (1996). What’s cognitive about cognitive linguistics. In E. Casad (Ed.), Cognitive linguistics in the redwoods: The expansion of a new paradigm in linguistics (pp. 27-53). Berlin: De Gruyter Mouton.
Langacker, R. (2001). Dynamicity in grammar. Axiomathes, 12, 7-33.
Matlock, T. (2004a). Fictive motion as cognitive simulation. Memory & Cognition, 32(8): 1389-1400.
Matlock, T. (2004b). The conceptual motivation of fictive motion. In G. Radden & K-U. Panther (Eds.), Studies in Linguistic Motivation (pp. 221-248). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Matlock, T. (2006). Depicting fictive motion in drawings. In J. Luchenbroers (Ed.), Cognitive linguistics: Investigations across languages, fields and philosophical boundaries (pp. 67-85). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Matlock, T. (2010). Abstract motion is no longer abstract. Language & Cognition, 2(2), 243-260.
Matlock, T. (2017). Metaphor, simulation and fictive motion. In B. Dancygier (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of cognitive linguistics (pp. 477-489). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Matlock, T. & Richardson, D. (2004). Do eye movements go with fictive motion? Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, 26, 909-914.
Matlock, T., Ramscar, M., & Boroditsky, L. (2005). The experiential link between spatial and temporal language. Cognitive Science, 29(4), 655-664.
McGlone, M. & Harding, J. (1998). Back (or forward?) to the future: The role of perspective in temporal language comprehension. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition, 24(5), 1211-1223.
Richardson, D. & Matlock, T. (2007). The integration of figurative language and static depictions: An eye movement study of fictive motion. Cognition, 102(1), 129-138.
Saygin, A., McCullough, S., Alac, M., & Emmorey, K. (2010). Modulation of BOLD response in motion-sensitive lateral temporal cortex by real and fictive motion sentences. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 22(11), 2480-2490.
Wallentin, M., Østergaard, S., Lund, T., Østergaard, L., & Roepstorff, A. (2005). Concrete spatial language: See what I mean? Brain & Language, 92(3), 221-233.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
How to Cite
