The performance evaluation of homestead exit under the background of rural revitalization

Haiting  Guo

doi:10.54691/f9y8rs08

Authors

Haiting Guo

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/f9y8rs08

Keywords:

Sichuan province, homestead exit, performance evaluation, fuzzy comprehensive evaluation.

Abstract

The reform of rural residential land system was piloted in 2015. Then, the scope of the pilot was expanded in 2020. An important part of the reform of the homestead system is the homestead exit, which is also a basic and important front-end link in the reform of the homestead system. In this study, the four pilot area: Pengshan District, Ziyang City, Cuiping District and Luxian District, which are close to Chengdu City of Sichuan Province, were investigated and questionnaires were distributed to the farmers. Based on the research data, from the perspective of farmers, this study selects indicators from three aspects including economic benefits, social benefits and living environment to make sub-objective evaluation and comprehensive evaluation of homestead exit performance. In the calculation process, the entropy weight method is used to calculate the weight of each index and the fuzzy comprehensive evaluation method is used to calculate the performance score. The research results show that the comprehensive performance of homestead exit in the surveyed areas is “good”, and the performance evaluation results are “average”, “good” and “good” respectively from the three aspects of economic benefits, social benefits and living environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Zhongxiao Li , Hongsong Zhao, Li Chengyuan. Study on paid use and charging standard of Rural homestead. Journal of Jilin Agricultural University. (1993) No. 04, p. 94-98.

[2] Xueqin Liang, Xinan Lu, Jingxiu JIA. What should we do if we take up too much homestead? Dingtao County implemented several practices of paying for the use of rural overoccupied homestead. China Land. (2000) No. 10, p. 36-37.

[3] Tingchang Li, Caiwei Gong. Village renovation is urgent—Investigation on the use and management of rural homestead in Yinzhou District of Ningbo City. China Land. (2003) No. 03, p. 37-38.

[4] Dawei Zhu, Fanglin Zhu. A study on farmers’ homestead withdrawal intention under different economic development levels: Based on 549 questionnaires in Jiangsu Province. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning. Vol. 42 (2021) No. 09, p. 207-215.

[5] Xia Chen, Zhemin LI, Yuting WANG. Farmers’ social capital and homestead withdrawal intention: an analysis of the mediating effect based on risk resistance ability. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning. Vol. 43 (2022) No. 10, p. 232-245.

[6] Pengfei Sun, Renhui Zhang, Kai Zhao, et al. The influence of human capital on the homestead withdrawal behavior of farmers. Economic Survey. Vol. 39 (2022) No. 04, p. 41-50.

[7] Jun CAI, Lei ZHANG, Hongwei YUAN, et al. Research on Influencing factors of farmers’ homestead withdrawal behavior intention based on improved TAM framework. RESOURCES SCIENCE. Vol. 44 (2022) No. 05, p. 899-912.

[8] Yuling Wu, Ruiying Xie, Yiyi Yu. Effects of livelihood Resilience and value Perception on farmers’ homestead withdrawal Behavior response. Agricultural Economics and Management. (2022) No. 02, p. 69-78.

[9] Sijie Fan, Bixi Zhang, Wenxiu Zhang. Fuzzy evaluation of comprehensive performance of rural homestead reform: A case study of Chengdu. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning. Vol. 35 (2014) No. 02, p. 132-137.

[10] Jian Tang, Qing-bin WANG, Rong TAN. Performance evaluation of homestead system reform: Based on land policy implementation monitoring in 5 provinces of China. Jianghan Tribune. (2018) No. 02, p. 36-41.

[11] Xingming Zheng, Guoquan Lei. Practical progress, effectiveness review and promotion path of rural homestead exit reform: Based on comparative analysis of three typical pilot areas. Reform of Economic System. (2022) No. 04, p. 73-79.

[12] Runqiu Liu, ZhibingHuang, Qian Cao. Research on performance evaluation of homestead exit based on rural resilience perspective: A case study of Sanshui Town, Guanghan City, Sichuan Province. Chinese Land Science. Vol. 33 (2019) No. 02, p. 41-48.

[13] Runqiu Liu, Zhibing Huang. Evaluation of homestead exit pilot policy based on S-CAD method: A case study of Chengdu. Journal of Sichuan University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition). (2021) No. 05, p. 138-147.

[14] Bailin Zhang, Fengrong ZHANG, Yanbo QU, et al. Research hotspot and prospect of homestead withdrawal and reuse. RESOURCES SCIENCE. Vol. 43 (2021) No. 07, p. 1277-1292.

[15] Fachao Liang, Caiyun Lin. A study on the welfare effects of rural homestead withdrawal under different models: A case study of Jinjiang City, Fujian Province. Chinese Journal of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning. Vol. 42 (2021) No. 03, p. 240-248.

[16] Maolin Yang. Research on Handling Methods of Sensitive Questions in Questionnaire Survey. Marketing Research. (2014) No. 05, p. 46-48.

[17] Newburn DA, Berck P. Modeling suburban and rural-residential development beyond the urban fringe. Land Economics. Vol. 82 (2006) No. 04, p. 481-499.

[18] Ampofo JA. Rural housing challenges in the Upper West Region of Ghana: A case study of Kulmasa. International Journal of Management & Entrepreneurship Research. Vol. 2 (2020) No. 04, p. 194-211.

[19] Gkartzios M, Scott M. Planning for rural housing in the Republic of Ireland: from national spatial strategies to development plans. European planning studies. Vol. 17 (2009) No. 12, p. 1751-1780.