A Scoping Review of Content-and-Language Integrated Learning

Authors

  • Yongling Zhou

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/k5b50003

Keywords:

CLIL; Theoretical Basis; Research Fields; Evaluation.

Abstract

As plurilingualism highlights the need for greater attention to foreign and second language learning, it gives rise to CLIL development. Using scoping review methodology, this paper aims to elaborate the pedagogy by providing an overview of the contexts, theoretical basis, two focus areas of CLIL research, and evaluation of CLIL. The findings highlight that learners can gain a range of benefits in CLIL classroom like cognitive development, improvement of language knowledge and skills, and increased learning motivation, while CLIL posed challenges to CLIL teachers, learners, and teaching materials. Therefore, teachers should enhance their knowledge and skills to choose and decide suitable teaching materials and to help learners gain language and content knowledge in CLIL class.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Dalton-Puffer, C: Content-and-Language Integrated Learning: From Practice to Principles, Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, Vol. 48(2011) No. 31, p.182–204.

Junyao Chang and Zhaohao Liu: Theoretical Supports for the Approach/Philosophy of CLI, Foreign Languages and Their Teaching, Vol. 21 (2020) No. 6, p. 85-95+150.

Krashen, S: Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition (Pergamon, UK 1982).

Snow M: A conceptual framework for integration of language and content in second/foreign language instruction, TESOL Quarterly, Vol. 31(1989) No.2, p. 201-217.

Krashen, S: The input hypothesis. Issues and implications (Longman, UK 1985).

Swain, M: Principle and practice in applied linguistics (Oxford University Press, UK 1995).

Doughty, C & Williams, J: Focus on form in classroom second language acquisition (Cambridge University Press, UK 1998).

Lyster, R: Learning and Teaching Languages Through Content: A Counterbalanced Approach (John Benjamins, Netherlands 2007).

Simpson, T: Dare I oppose constructivist theory, The Educational Forum, Vol. 59 (2002) No.4, p. 347-354.

Cobb, P.& J. Bowers: Cognitive and situated learning perspectives in theory and practice. Educational Researcher, Vol.24 (1999) No. 2, p. 4-15.

Kong, S and Hoare P, and Yanping C: Immersion education in China: Teachers' perspectives, Frontiers of Education in China, Vol. 6 (2011) No.1, p. 68-91.

Dalton-Puffer, C: Discourse in CLIL classrooms (John Benjamins, Netherlands 2007).

Lingley, D: A Task-based Approach to Teaching a Content-based Canadian Studies Course in EFL Context, Asian EFL Journal, Vol. 16 (2006) No. 3, p. 58-64.

Coyle, D: Content and Language Integrated Learning: Towards a Connected Research Agenda for CLIL Pedagogies, International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, Vol. 4 (2007) No. 5, p. 543-562.

Arkoudis, S: Fusing pedagogic horizons: Language and content teaching in the mainstream, Linguistics and Education, Vol11 (2005) No. 16, p. 173-187.

Tan, M: Mathematics and science teachers' beliefs and practices regarding the teaching of language in content learning, Language Teaching Research, Vol. 5 (2011) No. 3, p. 325-342.

Downloads

Published

2024-07-24

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Zhou, Y. (2024). A Scoping Review of Content-and-Language Integrated Learning. Frontiers in Science and Engineering, 4(7), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.54691/k5b50003