Arbitral Settlement of Joint Infringement by Private Equity Funds

Authors

  • Qianying Wang

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/pgf3z297

Keywords:

Private Equity Disputes; Joint Infringement; Expansion of Arbitration Agreements.

Abstract

Based on the confidentiality and efficiency of arbitration, the dispute resolution method is often agreed as arbitration in the contracts involving private equity funds. The investment process of private equity funds often involves multi-layer nesting to avoid regulation and infringement of investors' rights and interests. Such infringement cases involve joint infringement by a majority of people, and it is difficult for investors to claim their rights through infringement lawsuits based on the exclusionary effect of a valid arbitration agreement on jurisdiction in the event that investors have signed a valid arbitration agreement. Due to the relativity of the arbitration agreement, the arbitral tribunal cannot break through the validity of the arbitration agreement to pursue the liability of other joint infringers when accepting the relevant case, and cannot resolve the dispute at once. If the validity of the arbitration agreement can be extended to other joint tortfeasors in the private equity fund, it will not only facilitate the investors to claim their rights and interests, but also improve the efficiency of dispute resolution.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Shanghai Higher People's Court, Mao Ronghua, Shan Suhua, et al. Study on the Legal Application of Private Fund Disputes, Law Application, vol. 8 (2023), 108-119.

[2] Nandi. On the Legal Status of the Third Party with a Genuine Interest in Arbitration in the Context of the Civil Code--with Reference to the Revision of the Arbitration Law, South University of Law, vol. 4 (2023), 154-169.

[3] Huang Weifeng, Cheng Junjie. Study on Difficult Issues of Private Equity Fund Litigation Disputes, Law Application, vol. 4 (2023), 95-107.

[4] Liu Junhai. On the Joint and Several Liability of Trustees and Managers of Trust-based Private Equity Funds: The Four Dimensions of Fund Law, Trust Law, Contract Law and Tort Law, Politics and Law, vol. 2 (2023), 47-62.

[5] Kong Yanping. Liability of Private Fund Managers and Controlling Shareholders for Breach of Fiduciary Obligations, People's Justice, vol. 2 (2023), 4-8.

[6] Xiao Xiu. Exploration of the Structure Type of Private Equity Investment Fund - The Perspective of Private Equity Fund Manager Issuance, Business News, vol. 27 (2021), 79-81.

[7] Li Junhai, Xu Zicheng. Expansion of the Validity of Arbitration Agreement, People's Justice, vol. 23 (2021), 103-106.

[8] Liu Junhai. On the Claims of Limited Partners of Partnership Private Equity Funds for Withdrawal of Partnership Property--Different Dimensions of Partnership Law and Investment Fund Law, Politics and Law, vol. 6 (2021), 79-97.

[9] Wang Bei. Review and Improvement of the Third Party Procedural Access System in Arbitration, Journal of East China University of Politics and Law, vol. 3 (2021), 130-143.

[10] Gui Yan. The Expansion of the Validity of Arbitration Agreement and Its Determination, People's Justice, vol. 5 (2020), 70-74.

[11] Wang Meng, Jiao Furong. The Legal Status and Responsibility Boundary of Private Fund Custodian--Taking the Case of Investor v. Custodian Infringement as an Example, China Securities and Futures, vol. 2 (2019), 72-78.

[12] Zhang Yin. Research on the Choice of Organizational Form of Private Equity Funds in China, Financial Economy, vol. 24 (2009), 125-126.

Downloads

Published

2024-10-22

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Wang, Q. (2024). Arbitral Settlement of Joint Infringement by Private Equity Funds. Frontiers in Science and Engineering, 4(10), 127-132. https://doi.org/10.54691/pgf3z297