Critical Thought Pattern Differences and Problem-Solving Approaches in Communication between People from the US and Japan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/fh8gdv79Keywords:
Thought patterns; Problem-solving approaches; Communication; Cultural differences.Abstract
Effective communication between individuals from the United States and Japan can be particularly challenging due to the profound cultural differences that influence their critical thought patterns and problem-solving approaches. These differences manifest in various ways, including contrasting perspectives on individualism versus collectivism, egalitarianism versus hierarchy, directness versus indirectness, and linear versus holistic thinking styles. In interactions between Americans and Japanese, these cultural disparities can lead to misunderstandings, misinterpretations, and communication barriers. To address these challenges, it is crucial to develop an understanding of the underlying cultural factors that shape communication styles in both cultures. This article delves into these cultural differences, highlighting how they impact formal and informal communication settings. Furthermore, we discuss practical strategies and techniques that can be employed to bridge these gaps, facilitate better understanding, and enhance the effectiveness of cross-cultural communication between individuals from the United States and Japan. By recognizing and addressing these cultural nuances, we can foster more harmonious and productive interactions across these two distinct cultural contexts.
Downloads
References
[1] Kemppainen, R. P., & Holden, N. (2020). Intertwining the individual and organisational experience: asymmetries of cross-cultural knowledge sharing, networking and learning. European Journal of International Management, 14(1), 92.
[2] Zakaria, N., & Muton, N. a. R. (2022). Cultural code-switching in high context global virtual team members: A qualitative study. International Journal of Cross Cultural Management, 22(3), 487–515.
[3] Al-Sharaa, M. H. A., & Hishan, S. S. (2022). The Impact of Cross-Culture Risk on International Business Negotiations. International Journal of Information Technology Project Management, 13(2), 1–13.
[4] Brewer, P., & Venaik, S. (2011). Individualism–Collectivism in Hofstede and GLOBE. Journal of International Business Studies, 42(3), 436–445.
[5] Chen, N. F., Chao, M. C., Xie, H., & Tjosvold, D. (2017). Transforming cross-cultural conflict into collaboration. Cross Cultural & Strategic Management, 25(1), 70–95.
[6] Kay, A. C.(2021). Ironic Egalitarianism: When hierarchy-attenuating motives increase hierarchy-enhancing beliefs. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 164, 86–101.
[7] Tomita, K. (2022). Open innovation and drug discovery startups in Japan: The importance of communication in licensing. Asia-Pacific Management Review, 27(4), 282–291.
[8] Soares, M. J. G. O., Mosquera, P., & Cid, M. C. (2021). Antecedents of innovative behaviour: knowledge sharing, open innovation climate and internal communication. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 30(2), 241.
[9] Zollo, L., Rialti, R., Tron, A., & Ciappei, C. (2020). Entrepreneurial passion, orientation and behavior: the moderating role of linear and nonlinear thinking styles. Management Decision, 59(5), 973–994.
[10] Donohue, W. A., Cai, D. A., Fink, E. L., & Umana, E. A. (2023). Conflict, communication and team collaboration: a comparison of Nigerians and US Americans. International Journal of Conflict Management.
[11] Barkley, K. (2020). Does one size fit all? The applicability of situational crisis communication theory in the Japanese context. Public Relations Review, 46(3), 101911.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Frontiers in Science and Engineering

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.




