Decision-making of Enterprise Greenwashing Behavior Under The Background of Carbon Tariff

Authors

  • Fangfang Li

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/qmp91771

Keywords:

Greenwash; Blockchain; Government subsidies; Green supply chain.

Abstract

Research background: As the EU deals with carbon leakage through carbon tariffs, export enterprises of some countries that do not meet the carbon emission standards face the problem of increasing export costs, so these enterprises have the tendency of "green washing". Therefore, how enterprises make decisions to deal with carbon tariffs and avoid the impact of changes in the terms of trade has become a hot topic. Based on the cost constraints of enterprises in developing countries, the information asymmetry between upstream and downstream enterprises, and the external environment constraints such as government and enterprise regulation and subsidy strategies, enterprises will make different decisions, including "brown enterprise" behavior that only considers economic benefits and "green enterprise" behavior that considers both economic benefits and environmental benefits. The research approach in this paper is based on game-theoretic analysis and adopts the supply chain game model proposed by Pretis (2022) [1]and Dong (2023[2]). This paper mainly discusses the different situations of maximizing the profit of individual enterprise and the profit of the whole supply chain through the game of the manufacturer's cost information advantage and the retailer's market information advantage. Finally, let business and government work together to get business to cancel the green washing practices that have been adopted. Conclusion: Based on the hypothesis that the EU is imposing carbon tariffs on developing countries, the greenwashing behavior of manufacturers and retailers is related to the green investment return rate of enterprises, the cost and rate of return of blockchain technology, and government subsidies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Pretis, F. (2022). Does a Carbon Tax Reduce CO2 Emissions? Evidence from British Columbia. Environmental & Resource Economics, 83(1), 115–144. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10640-022-00679-w

[2] Dong, Ciwei, Huang, Qianzhi, Pan, Yuqing, Ng, Chi To, & Liu, Renjun. (2023). Logistics outsourcing: Effects of greenwashing and blockchain technology. Transportation Research. Part E, Logistics and Transportation Review, 170, 103015.

[3] Wojciech Przychodzen.(2024).Political factors in renewable energy generation: Do populism, carbon tax and feed-in tariffs matter?.Energy Research & Social Science103628-103628.

[4] Fang, Yuan, Yu, Yugang, Shi, Ye, & Liu, Jie. (2020). The effect of carbon tariffs on global emission control: A global supply chain model. Transportation Research. Part E, Logistics and Transportation Review, 133, 101818.

[5] Kilolo, Jean‐Marc Malambwe. (2018). Do big countries always win a tariff war? A reappraisal. Review of Development Economics, 22(4), E239-E249.

[6] Bounds, G. (2010). Misleading claims on ‘green’ labeling. Wall Street Journal, October 26. Retrieved from https://online.wsj.com/news/ articles/SB10001424052702303467004575574521710082414

[7] Wu, Yue, Zhang, Kaifu, & Xie, Jinhong. (2020). Bad Greenwashing, Good Greenwashing: Corporate Social Responsibility and Information Transparency. Management Science, 66(7), 3095-3112.

[8] Madani, Seyed Reza, & Rasti-Barzoki, Morteza. (2017). Sustainable supply chain management with pricing, greening and governmental tariffs determining strategies: A game-theoretic approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 105, 287-298.[55]Sheu, Jiuh-Biing, & Chen, Yenming J. (2012). Impact of government financial intervention on competition among green supply chains. International Journal of Production Economics, 138(1), 201-213.

[9] Rahman, Imran, Park, Jeongdoo, & Chi, Christina Geng-qing. (2015). Consequences of “greenwashing”. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 27(6), 1054-1081.

[10] Loannou, I., Kassinis, G., & Papagiannakis, G. (2023). The Impact of Perceived Greenwashing on Customer Satisfaction and the Contingent Role of Capability Reputation. Journal of Business Ethics, 185(2), 333–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05151-9

[11] Song, H., Han, S., & Yu, K. (2023). Blockchain-enabled supply chain operations and financing: the perspective of expectancy theory. International Journal of Operations & Production Management, 43(12), 1943–1975. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJOPM-07-2022-0467

[12] Xu, C., Tang, X., Song, J., & Wang, C. (2023). Research on low-carbon dual channel supply chain considering product substitution under government carbon tax and low-carbon subsidy. PloS One, 18(6), e0287167–e0287167. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0287167

Downloads

Published

2024-12-23

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Li, F. (2024). Decision-making of Enterprise Greenwashing Behavior Under The Background of Carbon Tariff. Frontiers in Science and Engineering, 4(12), 110-119. https://doi.org/10.54691/qmp91771