Research on the Differential Impacts of Selective Industrial Policy and Competitive Industrial Policy on Enterprise Innovation

Yao Jia

doi:10.54691/cwcgqz77

Authors

Yao Jia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/cwcgqz77

Keywords:

Selective Industrial Policy, Competitive Industrial Policy, Enterprise Innovation, Innovation Input, Innovation Output.

Abstract

Industrial policy, as an important means for governments to intervene in the market and promote industrial upgrading, is mainly divided into selective industrial policy and competitive industrial policy. The two types of policies have obvious differences in intervention logic, implementation methods and target orientations, which will inevitably lead to differential impacts on enterprise innovation. This paper uses 2018-2022 panel data of China’s A-share listed manufacturing firms to analyze how selective and competitive industrial policies differently affect corporate innovation, alongside moderating effects of firm scale and ownership. Selective policies boost innovation input insignificantly affecting output quality, while competitive policies improve both notably. The two policies exert disparate influences on state-owned, private, large and small firms. Relevant suggestions are proposed to optimize policy collocation and drive corporate innovation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Yang, W., Wang, X., & Zhou, D. (2024). Research on the impact of industrial policy on the innovation behavior of strategic emerging industries. Behavioral Sciences, 14(4), 346. https://doi.org/10.3390/bs14040346

[2] Yan, C., Ji, Y., & Chen, R. (2023). Research on the mechanism of selective industrial policies on enterprises' innovation performance--Evidence from China's photovoltaic industry. Renewable Energy, 215, 118868. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2023.118868

[3] Huang, X., & Zhu, R. (2026). Selective Industrial Policy and Innovation Efficiency in Chinese Listed Companies. Economics of Transition and Institutional Change, 34(1), 117–136.

[4] Liu, T., Yan, W., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Functional or selective policy?-Research on the relationship between government intervention and enterprise innovation in China. International Review of Economics & Finance, 86, 82–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2023.04.007

[5] Tian, G. (2020). From industrial policy to competition policy: A discussion based on two debates. China Economic Review, 62, 101505. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chieco.2020.101505

[6] Criscuolo, C., Martin, R., Overman, H., & Van Reenen, J. (2012). The causal effects of an industrial policy (Working Paper No. w17842). National Bureau of Economic Research. https://www.nber.org/papers/w17842

[7] Lazzarini, S. G. (2015). Strategizing by the government: Can industrial policy create firm‐level competitive advantage? Strategic Management Journal, 36(1), 97–112. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2204

[8] Alder, S., Shao, L., & Zilibotti, F. (2016). Economic reforms and industrial policy in a panel of Chinese cities. Journal of Economic Growth, 21(4), 305–349. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10887-016-9134-4

[9] Reich, R. B. (1982). Making industrial policy. Foreign Affairs, 60(4), 852–881. https://doi.org/10.2307/20041235

[10] Weiss, J. (2013). Strategic industrial policy and business environment reform (DCED Working Paper). DCED.

[11] Criscuolo, C., Martin, R., Overman, H. G., & Van Reenen, J. (2019). Some causal effects of an industrial policy. American Economic Review, 109(1), 48–85. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20171760

[12] Qin, S., & Xiong, Y. (2023). Differential impact of subsidised and nonsubsidized policies on the innovation of new energy vehicle enterprises: Evidence from China. Asian Journal of Technology Innovation, 31(2), 260–283. https://doi.org/10.1080/19761597.2023.2199976

[13] Stiglitz, J. E., Lin, J. Y., & Monga, C. (2013). Introduction: the rejuvenation of industrial policy. In J. E. Stiglitz, J. Y. Lin, & C. Monga (Eds.), The industrial policy revolution I: The role of government beyond ideology (pp. 1–15). Palgrave Macmillan UK.