CPTPP State-Owned Enterprise Rules and Our Countermeasures
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/p42x6q64Keywords:
SOE Rules; Cptpp; Competition Neutrality; Non-Commercial Aid.Abstract
State-owned enterprises (soes) play an important role in the global economy. Some developed countries believe that because of the state nature of SOES, SOES enjoy more privileges and unfair competitive advantages than private enterprises, including government subsidies and regulatory incentives, so that their market competitiveness and overall strength are strong. In order to get rid of the “Official business” advantage of state-owned enterprises, promote the equal competition between state-owned enterprises and private enterprises, and reduce the concern of state-owned enterprises, the rules of our state-owned enterprises are gradually formed. For the first time in the international market, CPTPP specifically regulates the rules of state-owned enterprises. Compared with other free trade agreements, cPTPP's SOE rules are characterized by stronger competition neutrality rules, wider scope of application, more non-commercial aid rules and higher transparency. In the context of China's imminent accession to CPTPP, this paper analyzes the regulation of our state-owned enterprises that have signed the free trade agreement, and finds that the number of state-owned enterprises to be regulated in the free trade agreement is small and the level of regulation is low. Therefore, we must actively negotiate the new issues of state-owned enterprises and actively participate in the construction of international rules of state-owned enterprises. For the CPTPP high-level SOE rules negotiation, we should follow China's national conditions, study the introduction of ownership-neutral competition-neutral principle as the core, and further deepen the reform of state-owned enterprises, state-owned enterprises to standardize the way of subsidies.
Downloads
References
An analysis of the principle of competition neutrality under the framework of American regional trade and investment agreements . Contemporary Asia Pacific, 2014(06) : 117-131 + 158-159.
Shen Wei: the difficulty of the state-owned enterprises to deviate from and neutralize competition under the principle of “Competition neutrality”. Economic Research in Shanghai, 2019, No. 368(05): 11-28.
Jiang Fen: a study on the nature of state-owned enterprises in the context of countervailing measures. Shanghai Journal of Beijing University of International Business and Economics, 24(01)2017: 5-13.
Chen Weidong. Sino-us dispute over the status of subsidy providers for state-owned enterprises: focusing on WTO cases. Contemporary law, 2017,31(03): 21-30.
Han Liyu: TPP SOE rules and their impact. Journal of the National Academy of Administration, 2016, No. 100(01): 83-87.
Liu Bin and Wei Wei: a study on the“Entity-covered” clause of the china-eu Investment Agreement and the related challenges of China's accession to the CPTPP. Wu Da International Law Review, 2021,5(06): 116-134.
Wang Xiaosong, Wu: Studies on the impact of CPTPP establishment and China's coping strategies. Regional and global development, 2018(3): 46-71.
Fan Ying: the characteristics and influence of CPTPP and China's countermeasures. Contemporary World, 2018(09): 8-12.
Li Junfeng: the evolution of competition-neutral international regulation and China's coping strategies--taking the“Subsidy case for large civil aircraft” between the United States and Europe as a reference. Journal of the Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, 2021, 23(01): 138-152.
Kong Junfeng: the strengthening of competition neutrality under the reconstruction of international trade and investment rules and China's response. Journal of Jiangxi University of Finance and Economics, 2021(04): 135-148.
Liu Ying: China's response to the state-owned enterprises chapter of the trans-pacific partnership agreement. Eastern law, 2016(05): 55-62.
Gao Yan and Wang Jingtong: legal countermeasures to promote the reform of mixed ownership of state-owned enterprises. Zhongzhou journal, 2020(11): 52-56.
Ioannis Lianos, Ioannis Kokkoris. The Reform of EC Competition Law: New Challenges. Austin: Wolters Kluwer Law and Business, 2010.
C. L. Lim, Deborah Elms and Patrick Low. The Trans-Pacific Partnership: A Quest for a Twent y-first-Century Trade Agreement. Cambridge University Press, 2014.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Scientific Journal Of Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.





