Analysis of Green Intellectual Property Issues and Countermeasures from the Perspective of International Law
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.54691/e96tmv48Keywords:
Green Technological Innovation; Green Intellectual Property Rights; International Law; Transnational Infringement.Abstract
As an advanced form of productivity driven by green technological innovation, there exists a natural fit and close connection between new quality productivity and green intellectual property rights. Legal protection is the cornerstone of the development of new productivity, in which the comprehensive protection of intellectual property rights is particularly crucial: green intellectual property rights, as a key force to adhere to sustainable development and promote scientific and technological progress and economic growth, has a central role to play in incentivizing environmental protection as the core of independent innovation, thus becoming an indispensable institutional guarantee for the development of new productivity. This institutional guarantee ensures the legitimate rights and interests of innovation achievements, and is a powerful driving force and a long-term solution for the continuous progress of productive forces. At present, the field of intellectual property cooperation is encountering diversified challenges and problems: the unilateralization caused by some developed countries, the rigidity of international rules on intellectual property, the stagnation behind the digital age, and the imbalance in the distribution of existing international benefits of intellectual property, which should be paid close attention to. In order to effectively promote green technological innovation and escort the green intellectual property protection system to a stable and far-reaching future, countries and enterprises should face the current challenges rationally, correctly understand the differences and conflicts between green intellectual property rights and ordinary intellectual property rights, gain a deeper understanding of the existing relevant international law foundations, and promptly solve the green intellectual property rights issues, improve the relevant international conventions and treaties, strengthen the coordination and cooperation of international organizations, and establish a fair and reasonable green technology patent protection mechanism. fair and reasonable patent protection mechanism for green technology. Only when countries join hands to improve the green intellectual property protection mechanism, jointly combat transnational infringement and maintain a fair market competition environment can the legitimate rights and interests of innovators be safeguarded.
Downloads
References
[1]LIU Yu, ZHANG Shuo, LIANG Dong. Intellectual property protection, technological distance and the "incremental quality" of enterprises' green technological innovation[J]. Environmental Economics Research, 2024, 9(02): 18-41. DOI:10.19511/j.cnki.jee.2024.02.002.
[2]Sun Jianfeng. Research on the Reform of Intellectual Property Management in Green and Low-carbon Industries under the Background of Big Data[J]. Industrial Innovation Research, 2024, (10): 16-18.
[3]Tian Xiaoyi. Strengthening intellectual property protection and promoting green technology innovation[J]. Environmental Economy, 2023, (18): 66-69.
[4]Lin Xiuqin, Su Zeru. Challenges and Responses of International Cooperation on Intellectual Property Rights under the "Belt and Road" Initiative--Taking the Theory of Interaction Behavior as a Perspective[J/OL]. Journal of Hainan University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 1-13[2024-08-28]. https://doi.org/10.15886/j.cnki.hnus.202303.0147.
[5]Li Jiguang, Zheng Yuli, Tian Feng. An economic analysis of the reform of the WTO dispute settlement mechanism[J]. Asia-Pacific Economy, 2023, (02): 46-56. DOI:10.16407/j.cnki.1000-6052.2023.02.014.
[6]WU Zhaofeng. Empirical Study on State Sovereignty Issues in WTO Dispute Settlement Practice [D]. East China University of Politics and Law,2017.
[7]Song H. N. Statistics and Trend Analysis of Global Patent Transactions in Recent Years - An Examination with the U.S. Patent Transaction Market as the Main Focus [J]. Technology and law, 2015, (04): 812-843.
[8]MA Yongqiang, ZHAO Liangkai, YANG Huayue, et al. Air Pollution and Corporate Green Innovation - Empirical Evidence Based on A-share Listed Companies in China's Heavy Pollution Industry[J]. Industrial Economics Research, 2021, (06): 116-128. DOI:10.13269/j.cnki.ier.2021.06.009.
[9]Lv Fenchao. Research on the Legal Application of Foreign Trademark Right Infringement in Cross-border E-commerce Environment [D]. Huaqiao University,2019.
[10]GUO Shoukang, SHI Xueqing. The First Revision of WTO Agreements-Amendment of Article 31 of the Trips Agreement[J]. Journal of Hainan University (Humanities and Social Sciences Edition), 2009, 27(01): 38-44. DOI:10.15886/j.cnki.hnus.2009.01.002.
[11]ZHANG Huibin, HE Yiping. The Way Out of International Intellectual Property Dispute Settlement in the Context of WTO Appellate Body Suspension--Analysis Based on ISDS Practice[J]. Journal of International Economic Law, 2023, (03): 127-142.
[12]Ma Yide. The Construction of a Strong Intellectual Property Country under the Overall Situation of Global Governance[J]. Intellectual Property, 2021, (10): 41-54.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Scientific Journal Of Humanities and Social Sciences

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.





