An Ecological Discourse Analysis of Network News in Xinhuanet from the Perspective of Transitivity System

Hui Li

doi:10.54691/he6psh77

Authors

Hui Li

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/he6psh77

Keywords:

Transitivity system; Ecological discourse analysis; Xinhuanet; Network news discourse.

Abstract

In Chinese media, ecological stories told by network news focus on the achievements of ecological civilization construction in the new era, intensifying pollution control and accelerating the transition to a model of green development. Ecological discourse of network news is the network language representation of the ecological environment, which can be analyzed by applying the theory of systemic functional linguistics. Themed on “ecological construction”, “pollution prevention and control” as well as “green development” under the “Environmental Protection” column, this thesis collects thirty-five network news reports from Xinhuanet. Quantitative analysis is used to explore the distribution of participants, transitivity processes and circumstantial elements. Guided by the ecosophy of one basic assumption and three principles, qualitative analysis is also conducted to define the features of ecological discourse based on the characteristics of transitivity system and the analysis of the context. It aims to analyze the ecological orientation of ecological discourse of network news, and guide the ecological consciousness of harmonious coexistence between human and nature. This thesis aims to answer three questions: (1) What are the distribution patterns of the participants, transitivity processes as well as circumstantial elements in network news? (2) How are the ecological features of the participants, transitivity processes as well as circumstantial elements distributed in network news? The major findings are shown as follows: (1) Material, relational and verbal process participants account for 96.94% of all the participants; material, verbal and relational processes account for 96.75%, while mental, behavioral and existential processes occupy a small proportion; The range, location and manner circumstantial elements account for 74.89% of the total components, among which the duration and location elements account for a higher proportion. (2) Through analysis, it can be known that most of the discourses adhere to the basic assumption and three principles for ecological analysis of discourse. Human and non-human living forms account for 54.81%, which is slightly higher than the physical and social entities of participants, thus constructing the main content of participants’ ecological roles; Most of the network news processes are eco-beneficial processes, accounting for 64.43%, followed by eco-ambivalent processes and eco-destructive processes. Material, verbal and relational processes form the main framework of China’s ecological stories and construct a harmonious ecological discourse. Network news reports focus more on the objective world, and mental process as well as verbal process ensure the objectivity, authenticity, reliability of the network news; Elements such as extent, location, cause and manner in the circumstantial elements provide the major basic information of ecological stories and enhance the practical significance of ecological discourses. Moreover, the duration element forms the context of sustainable development concept, and the practical significance of ecological discourse has been sublimated.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Alexander, R. J. 2018. Investigating texts about environmental degradation using critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistic techniques [A]. In A. Fill & H. Penz (eds.). The Routledge Handbook of Ecolinguistics [C]. New York and London: Routledge, 196-210.

[2] Alexander, R. J. & A. Stibbe. 2014. From the analysis of ecological discourse to the ecological analysis of discourse [J]. Language Sciences (41): 104-110.

[3] Ha, C. C. & Huang, G. W. .2022, New Thought of Ecolinguistics and Its Implications to Ecological Discourse Analysis[J], Contemporary Foreign Language Studies, (05)：88-96.

[4] Halliday, M. A. K. 1994. An Introduction to Functional Grammar [M]. London: Arnold/Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.

[5] Halliday, M. A. K. 2001. New Ways of Meaning: A Challenge to Applied Linguistics. In A. Fill & P. Muhlhausler (eds.). The Ecolinguistics Reader: Language, Ecology and Environment. London: Continuum, 175-202.

[6] Halliday, M. A. K. 2007. Applied linguistics as an evolving theme [A]. In J. Webster (ed.). Collected Works of M. A. K. Halliday: Language and Education, Volume 5 [C]. London: Continuum.

[7] Han, Y. F. & Chen, L. J. , 2018, Transitivity System and China Image:A Corpus-based Study of Chinese Dream News in West and China [J], Contemporary Foreign Language Studies, (1)：19-30.

[8] Haugen, E. 1972. The ecology of language [A]. In A. Fill. & P. Mühlhusler (eds.). 2001. The Ecolinguistics Reader: Language, Ecology and the Environment [C]. London & New York: Continuum.

[9] He, W. , 2021, Ecological discourse analysis: Further development of the Halliday model [J], Foreign Language Education, (1)：20-27.

[10] He, W. & Geng, F. , 2018, A Contrastive Ecological Discourse Analysis of English and Chinese Advertisements for Environmental Protection [J], Technology Enhanced Foreign Language Education, (4)：57-63.

[11] He, W. & Ma, C., 2020, Theme System from an Ecolinguistic Perspective [J], Foreign Languages in China, (4)：23-32.

[12] He, W. & Wei, R., 2017, An analytical framework of transitivity for international ecological discourse [J], Modern Foreign Languages, (5)：597-607.

[13] He, W. & Wei, R., 2018a, Diversity and Harmony,Interaction and Co-existence——Ecosophy for International Ecological Discourse Analysis[J], Foreign Language Research, (6)：28-35.

[14] He, W. & Wei, R., 2018c, The Paradigm of Discourse Analyses and the Theoretical Foundation of Ecological Discourse Analysis[J], Contemporary Rhetoric, (5)：63-73.

[15] He, W. & Zhang, R. J., 2017, An Ecological Analytical Framework for Discourse [J], Foreign Languages in China,14 (5)：56-64.

[16] Huang, G. W., 2017, One assumption and three principles for ecological analysis of discourse and behavior[J], Foreign Language Teaching and Research, (6)：880-889.

[17] Huang, G. W., 2018, From Eco-critical Discourse Analysis to Harmonious Discourse Analysis [J], Foreign Languages in China, (4)：39-46.

[18] Huang, G. W. & Chen, Y., 2018, Indeterminacy in the Classification of Ecological Discourse Types[J], Journal of Beijing International Studies University, 40 (1)：3-14.

[19] Huang, G. W. & Ha, C. C., 2021, The relationship between ecological literacy and ecolinguistics[J], Foreign Language Education, 42 (1)：15-19.

[20] Huang, G. W. & Li, W. B., 2021, Ecolinguistics as Applied Linguistics [J], Modern Foreign Languages, 44 (5)：592-601.

[21] Huang, G. W. & Zhao, R. H., 2017, On the origin, aims, principles and methodology of eco-discourse analysis [J], Modern Foreign Languages, (5)：585-596+729.

[22] Lei, L. & Miao, X. W., 2020, The Study of Ecosophy in Ecological Discourse Analysis [J], Foreign Language Research, (3)：120-123.

[23] Li, S. H. 2007. A Systemic Functional Grammar of Chinese [M]. London: Continuum.

[24] Li, S. J., 2021, A Review of the Researches on the Ecosophy in Ecolinguistics [J], Foreign Languages and Literature, (1)：86-94.

[25] Lin, J. et al., 2013, Network Security under the Background of Social Engineering [J], Journal of Huaihua University, (5)：52-56.

[26] Naess, A. 1989. Ecology, Community, and Lifestyle: Outline of an Ecosophy [M]. Cambridge: Cambridge Univ. Press.

[27] Stibbe, A. 2012. Animals Erased: Discourse, Ecology, and Reconnection with the Natural World [M]. Middle town: Wesleyan University Press.

[28] Stibbe, A. 2015. Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live By [M]. London: Routledge.

[29] Stibbe, A. 2021. Ecolinguistics: Language, Ecology and the Stories We Live By (2nd edn) [M]. London: Routledge.

[30] Sun, J. & Guo, J. H. , 2022, Ecological Discourse Analysis of News Reports on Amazon Rainforest Fire from the Perspective of Transitivity [J], Foreign Languages in China, 19 (06)：70-75.

[31] Xin, Z. Y. & Huang, G. W., 2010, Systemic Functional Typology: Theory, Objective and Methodology [J], Foreign Language Research (5)：50-55.

[32] Zhang, R. J. , 2018, A Framework for Eco-oriented Discourse Analysisfrom the Perspective of Systemic Functiona!Linguistics [D],University of Science and Technology Beijing.

[33] Zhao, R. H. , 2016, A Multi-stratal Pattern of Ecological Discourse Analysis from a SystemicFunctional Perspective:A Case Study on the ldentity Construction of SilverHake in Ecological Assessment Reports [J], Foreign Languages in China, (5): 84-91.

[34] Zhou, W. J. , 2017, A Review of Huang Guowen's Ecolinguistic Research in the Chinese Context: Theory and Practice[J], Journal of Xi'an International Studies University, (3): 24-28.