The Construction and Pathway Concept of Data Legal Benefit Protection System

Authors

  • Kangyuan Li

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.54691/hnb5j885

Keywords:

Data crime; Data legal benefits; Criminal law protection.

Abstract

The conventional theories surrounding data legal benefits, whether dependent or independent, exhibit several shortcomings in addressing the complexities of ownership definitions that stem from the intangible and fluid nature of data. This inadequacy may inadvertently result in the inappropriate broadening of criminalization standards. Data legal benefits ought to be recognized as a unique category of legal benefit, characterized by a dualistic nature, where a dynamic interplay exists between intrinsic legal benefits and functional legal benefits. Any infringement upon the core of data could pose a direct threat to the legal benefits tied to the real-world implications of that data. In light of this understanding, I propose a "dual-layer data legal benefit protection framework," which categorizes data legal benefits and establishes tiered protection along with differentiated regulation for personal data, corporate data, and public data.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] Liu Feng, Lin D.d: "The Cybersecurity System of the United States," Science Press, 2015, p. 243.

[2] Zhang Mingkai. "Criminal Legislation in the Age of the Internet," China Prosecutor, 2017, (13): 80.

[3] Sun Daochui. "Examination and Prospects of Criminal Law Protection of Big Data Legal Interests," Journal of Central South University (Social Science Edition), 2017, 23(01): 58-64.

[4] Zhang Guihong. "On the Nature of Data and Its Relationship with Information," Philosophical Analysis, 2018, 9(02): 119-132 + 198-199.

[5] Ulrich Beck: "Global Risk Society and Criminal Law in the Information Society," translated by Zhou Zunyou, Jiang Su, et al., China Legal Publishing House, 2012, p. 308.

[6] Zhuang Jing. "Constructing an Open Chinese Data Criminal Law System: Based on the Distinction between Ontological Legal Interests and Functional Legal Interests," Chinese Journal of Criminal Law, 2023, (02): 37-53.

[7] Zhuang Jing. "Constructing an Open Chinese Data Criminal Law System: Based on the Distinction between Ontological Legal Interests and Functional Legal Interests," Chinese Journal of Criminal Law, 2023, (02): 37-53.

[8] Zhang Guihong. "On the Nature of Data and Its Relationship with Information," Philosophical Analysis, 2018, 9(02): 119-132 + 198-199.

[9] See Lin Li: "Legal Methodology and Dworkin," China University of Political Science and Law Press, 2002, p. 127.

[10] See Peng Cheng.X: "Research on Modern Rights Theory: An Analysis Based on 'Will Theory' and 'Interest Theory'," Law Press, 2017, p. 323.

Downloads

Published

2024-12-12

Issue

Section

Articles

How to Cite

Li, Kangyuan. 2024. “The Construction and Pathway Concept of Data Legal Benefit Protection System”. Scientific Journal Of Humanities and Social Sciences 6 (12): 79-87. https://doi.org/10.54691/hnb5j885.